Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of academic freedom for students
Importance of academic freedom for students
Importance of freedom in education pdf
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of academic freedom for students
Is education system in collegues good enough to prepare us for the future?Although students start the last stage of their education life, does it make sense to give the freedom of choosing compulsory courses to university?For example in some collegues, history lesson is compulsory for computer engineer departments, electronics lesson is compulsory for civil engineer departments and advanced mathematic lesson is compulsory for fine arts departments.There can be some explanations for university administration about this subject, but in my opinion,(as a university student) this traditional system needs to be changed, because every individual person has different characteristics and needs and university administration must not determine these students' courses just by looking of their department.For these reasons, university students must absolutely be free to choose their own courses which is called "open curriculum".
First of all, when university students have complete freedom to choose their own courses their performance clearly increases in many ways.Primiraly, this provides students to pay more attention to courses.Because they choose these courses volunteerly, it's obvious that these courses attract students more than the others.When they have the freedom of choice, their attendance to these classes increases, too.According to a survey conducted by Tom Clay and Lori Breslow, who are learning consultants, the most important factor students decide on lecture attendance is quality/clarify of lectures and they explain the reason with these words: "If students do not expect to learn from lectures, they are less likely to attend classes"(2006, para. 5).This result surely shows that students expectations and quality of lectures directl...
... middle of paper ...
...onal system.Finally, i believe college students can be more confident and less fearful about university education thanks to this system and universities can understand our different needs and interests as different individuals.
Works Cited
According to a survey conducted by Tom Clay and Lori Breslow, who are learning consultants, the most important factor students decide on lecture attendance is quality/clarify of lectures and they explain the reason with these words: "If students do not expect to learn from lectures, they are less likely to attend classes"(2006, para. 5).
As a proof to this increasing success rate, according to a research in Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, although open curriculum system began to be implemented in 2006,the students' performance was over the average after 5 years(Dumence,George,Taylor & Dollase,2012,pp 326-327).
Paul seems to make it out as something that we struggle through as students and can’t bear to hear the teacher say another word. Lectures are important, if done correctly, students do enjoy it. Students can speak their mind, compare and contrast, disagree and agree etc. we shouldn’t throw that away for mere view or thought of active learning. Active learning will not fit all courses, such as humanities, talking about ancient art works is all you can do in a sense because you can’t magically uncover another Picasso in the back of your classroom closet. Seems like the research that Paul provides in her article is from people who have never heard of a good lecture and have failed to observe what really happens in lecture. Her point is not clear. Is she talking about boring lectures? Good and bad lectures?
That means the student needs a closure of what the course is about before registering. Moreover, once registered, the student should acquire the textbooks, read them, outline every material, getting familiar with the contents. In addition, the student needs to research about the material. Also, students should create a brief connection with the course, even before the class starts. In fact, he/she needs to involve with general reading and the writing skills. Culpepper also states in his composition “The Myth of Inferiority”: “…students who write beautifully but fail to say anything of substance, and students who can hardly read, much less write clearly or think critically” (Culpepper 330). Therefore, to achieve academic success, the student has to prepare for the course in which he/she will attend. Moreover, if the course is too superior to the student’s level, he/she might commit plagiarized compositions, delayed works, or other unacceptable sins, causing him/her to fail the
Trying to implement a mandatory attendance policy at the university would be a terrible idea. The students should have to make a decision whether or not to come to class on their own initiative, not only to teach them to be responsible for their own actions but would also weed out the students who were not really focused on learning. Most college students have never been subject to the real world and many need to learn that they have to do things own their own without any outside influence because in most situations once out on their own no one will be looking over their shoulder to make sure they go to work or even meet any other required appointments. School is not a right it is a privilege and people need to realize that if learning is not taken seriously there can be extreme consequences.
Edmundson states, "professors don't pay full-bore attention to teaching, they don't have to work very hard-they've created a massive feather bed for themselves and called it a university" (Edmundson 408). I think by this, Edmundson means that professors feel like once their job is secure at their institute, they do not truly focus on the essential purpose of their job; to educate others. This is one problem that I have faced personally and another reason why I relate to this article. In the beginning of my first semester, I took a course where the professor would show up, lecture for the full duration, then dismiss us. The problem with this is that professors do not engage with their students, they lecture about the information but do not help us to understand the information that they are telling us. As Edmundson further explains, these types of professors are not ambitious, they secure their job at a university and feel as if they do not have to fully apply their teaching ability, just assign the coursework on the syllabus and expect the students to get it done. If we, as students, were to "fight" our school, we would target those select teachers who feel that just lecturing in class would suffice as
Higher education comes in many forms, from small private colleges with one professor for every seven students, to enormous universities which utilize teaching assistants for almost all offered classes. The question I have as a student at Purdue, a university with around 35,000 students, is are large lecture halls with more than two hundred students effective places for learning to occur? When there are that many pupils in a classroom, it is nearly impossible for an instructor to take attendance. What is the motivation to attend class? Further, are students able to understand material presented in a classroom when there are hundreds more people in the classroom rustling papers, dropping pens, and whispering sarcastic comments about the lecture?
The article featured by the New York Times called Are College Lectures Unfair? by Annie Murphy Paul is a about the inequality of lecturing in college classrooms. The article talks about how women, minorities, low-income and first generation families have a disadvantage in a lecture setting because they cannot connect with the material as well as others. The article talks about the lecture style classroom and the active learning style. The lecture is as it sounds the teacher talks for hours on end, boring the students half to sleep. Whereas the active learning style which has more structure and teacher-student connection. Overall the article talks about the disadvantages of lecture style classes and it would be in
The demand for a higher education degree is becoming more and more prevalent and necessary; and with tens of thousands of dollars being spent on college tuition annually (over 14,000 dollars for in-state public tuition, and over 33,000 dollars for in-state private tuition on average, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics), students are forking out a lot of money for a quality education. Though college degrees are becoming more of a necessity for most well paying jobs, it is still the student’s choice to attend college and spend all of that money. I believe that as consumers of the service that is education, if students are to spend this kind of money, they should be able to control their time spent in the classroom, but attendance policies and their repercussions at the college/university level are not making that possible. Grading on attendance policies at the college/university level is too harsh, and should be done away with all together.
...tion was only for the rich and powerful. Now it is available to everyone, this will have many advantages for our country, our people, and even our world. I definitely believe that it is impossible to be overeducated. The more people are educated, the better the world will be, because people will be able to discuss and exchange ideas. Another pro is that people with degrees have many more opportunities. They can take a wider variety of jobs and do what they enjoy doing, instead of being forced to take a job they dislike. Finally, although there are undoubtedly some problems with college as a business, I feel strongly that each and every individual can excel and gain from having a college education. A college education is the most valuable tool we can use; it’s a foundation that will carry anyone through a successful life. Remember Senator Kerry’s words on making a college investment your most important investment. We may only be 20 percent of the population today, but what we do and the choices we make are going to determine the future. And to me, a college education is a sound investment. An investment that with great dedication and determination will reap the very best rewards!
The good thing about Modern College in the 21st Century can manage how and when you take courses. For instance, I am sitting at home doing this paper at my pace and will submit it online. Although I have obligations to tend to at work, school and family, online colleges allow me and others to attend courses regardless of our busy lives. This is a balancing act because everything we do in life needs time and, unfortunately, we just do not have enough of that for everything. Therefore, we must allocate a certain number of hours per day for class work. A study shows that 5,522,194 students attended online courses. However, 14,853,595 students still attended traditional colleges in the fall of 2013. As you can see, there are still an enormous amount of students that prefer in classroom study. The benefits of this type of environment are the face to face interaction students get with the professor and other students. Regardless of your education environment, you still get the benefit of having group discussions and are provided with excellent resources. Nonetheless, continuing your education despite the new methods depends on
College students should be allowed to choose their courses because they will study more comfortably. Students will spend a lot of their time studying and researching more on the chosen course in order to excel. They will understand the course very well because; it is what they are interested in. In addition, if college students are given a chance to choose the subjects they want to study, they will be more eager to attend classes because, they love what there are dong. This means, many college students will excel I their studies. Thy will put a lot of effort in their studies and get best results because, they are comfortable with the course. Students need a chance to choose what courses to take, and as the result, they will get better marks, which is satisfactory both for them as well as for their teachers.
Independent.Leadership.Equality. All of these are three characteristics as to what free university education can provide to citizens.Higher education should be free of charge for the citizens of the United States.In the US the average cost for colleges per year is $8,893. Many middle class and under class people cannot afford such costs. It is true that the government will give you grants but most of the time students never get funding from them (Emmons 3). Most people of today can hardly afford a car let alone the fees and tuition of college. Also, it could provide equality to all people. Allowing everyone an equal opportunity to go to college and make something of themselves. It provides a way for poorer families to break free from their social strata that they have been put into (“This House Believes University Education Should Be Free” 4). This is why it is important to make university education free.In the end citizens of the US would benefit from university free education.
Clearly, the merits of having free higher education outweigh the drawbacks in immeasurable ways, benefiting the individual learners, states, and the nation at large. Having education in higher education free to all would ensure that every citizen get an equal opportunity in life regardless of their social status, it would allow people to concentrate on nation-building rather than loan payment after school, it would make the nation skill-sufficient and all citizens be more productive. Most importantly, education is a basic right that everyone deserves and money should not be a hindrance, thus, education should be free for all.
One of the focal opinions in favor of requiring attendance is that good attendance is needed to develop a strong sense of public in a classroom, and to foster a healthy sense of class involvement. For instructors who choose to stick with the old lecture model, this isn’t an issue. However, many instructors opt to have a participatory classroom filled with discussions and activities. This kind of teaching requires quite a bit more effort, and if it works well, the experience can be very beneficial and rewarding for students. However, students have to show up for this to work and take mutual responsibility to participating in class discussion– and failure to show up and participate
Mandatory attendance policy does not really enhance students' school performance as it's usually expected. Some teachers and schools believe students would study better if they come to class regularly. They argue that all lessons in text books should be explained, discussions should be held with full class. If students do not come to class, they would study nothing or make no progress. Some even think of students as lazy creatures who play truant to do everything they like but homework or assigned reading, so they take roll-call to ensure that all students come to class and work with them. What i can say is that attending class regularly does not mean you will have better understanding or performance. Some students sometimes miss class but they still study well. That's because there are some lessons they can study by themselves at home without spending too much time as those who study in class. On the other hand, so...
If they can keep the smaller classrooms the better off their students will be. In the study done by (Chen & Lin, 2015, p 350-359), they specified a negative effect of a large peer presence on college students’ performance in a class. When the class attendance was high in a large class, it was more likely for those less motivated students in the classroom to yield negative behaviors which in turn had a negative impact on the “better” students. This negative effect, will also influence some students to skip classes completely because they feel as though they will not be recognized in the class. In large classes, it is a lot easier for them to go unnoticed when they skip. If a professor cannot help a large class size, they need to manage their classroom better. He/she, will need to use more techniques to make students more engaged, and make students feel as though they are noticed. Even in a large class a professor should take attendance. They need to hold every student accountable, and let them know you are watching them. So, in an introductory economics course they need to keep the class sizes smaller, if they want to raise