Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pepsi vs. coke comparison
The case study of pepsi cola and coca cola
Comparing and contasting to coke vs. pepsi
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pepsi vs. coke comparison
In 1886 Coca-Cola was first formulated and in 1893 Pepsi-Cola was invented. It was during the time of the Great Depression when the competition between these two products truly began. Pepsi cut the price of its 12-oz bottle to 5 cents – which is what Coke was charging for their 6.5-oz bottle. During this time Pepsi competed directly with Coke and marketed to consumers that they were “twice as much for a nickel, too.” The most intense competition between the two CSD companies occurred during the years of 1975 - 1990s where Coke and Pepsi fought over the $66 billion industry. As CSD consumption rose steadily year after year, both Coke and Pepsi were achieving average annual revenue growth of 10%. The production and distribution of CSDs involved concentrate producers, bottlers, retail channels, and suppliers; concentrate producers and bottlers being the most prominent of these four participants. A concentrate producer’s most significant costs were for advertising, promotion, market research, and bottler support. The bottling process was capital-intensive and involved high-speed production lines that were interchangeable only for products of similar type and size.
The first success factor for the CSD industry started in 1893 with the idea that CSDs were “a potion for mental disorders”. Simply selling the product without attaching additional value for the customer may have been a complete failure for CSDs. Instead, it was marketed as something more than just satisfying thirst. This continued in the 1920’s when Coke initiated a “lifestyle” campaign linking the role that Coke played in a consumer’s life. In 1963, Pepsi launched their “Pepsi Generation” campaign targeting the young and “young at heart”. The ability to link a “lifestyle” to the CSD was a major success. Throughout the 1970’s the consumption of CSDs grew and a key success of both Coke and Pepsi was their ability to increase the availability of CSDs and introduce diet and flavoured varieties, which resulted in new product’s being delivered to consumers regularly; keeping them very interested in the product. Another key success factor of both Coke and Pepsi bottlers was their decision to offer direct store door delivery; route delivery salespeople managed the CSD brand in stores by securing shelf space, stacking CSD products, positioning the brand’s trademark label, and setting up end-of-aisle displays. This personal brand management was a key success to both Coke and Pepsi, and to the CSD industry as a whole, as it ensured that each brand was being properly managed at the store level.
The history of Coca Cola began in 1886 and it was founded by Atlanta pharmacist, Dr. John S. Pemberton the curiosity led him to create a distinctive tasting soft drink that could be sold at soda fountains. The first servings of Coca – Cola were sold for 5 cents for a glass. During the first year, sales were a meek nine portions per day in Atlanta. Today, daily servings of Coca Cola beverages are estimated at 1.9 billion globally. In 1886 he sold to Atlanta businessman, Asa G. Candler. Under the leadership of Mr. Candler’s the distribution of Coca – Cola expanded to soda fountains. In 1894, overwhelmed by the growing demand for Coca Cola and the desire to make the drink movable, Joseph Biedenharn fixed bottling machinery in the rear of his Mississippi beverage fountain, becoming the first to place Coca Cola in bottles. Considered an innovative tactic back in 1887, it was followed by newspaper publicity and the distribution of promotional items bearing the Coca Cola script to participating pharmacies. One of the most famous advertising slogans in Coca Cola history “The Pause That Refreshes” first appeared in the Saturday Evening Post in 1929. In 2009, the “Open Happiness” campaign was unveiled globally. The central message of “Open Happiness” is an invitation to billions around the world to recess, revive with a Coca Cola, and continue to enjoy one of life’s simple pleasures.
Coke continuously out-stands Pepsi, even though they share a very similar taste and colour, however Coke should not be the drink that receives all the love and attention for what it offers. Despite their similar soda colour, the drinks actually contain some different ingredients, which produce a different taste, and affect the body differently. Furthermore, the way the companies markets their drinks makes a huge contribution to how successful their products will become. The major element for success however stems from their impact on society and how the companies utilize their social power to evolve. The two major soda companies are constantly head to head with one another, yet it is what they do that sets them apart.
In both cases companies under this contract are not allowed to handle a direct competitive brand e.g. no possibility to bottle Pepsi and Cola at the same time. In 2000 Cokes bottling system was the most concentrated with its top 10 bottlers producing 94% of domestic volume followed by Pepsi with 85% and Schweppes with 71% of their respective franchisees. Focusing on the upstream of the supply chain it is to be said that bottlers have to contribute to CSD companies cost on Marketing but on the other hand have the right to refuse to contribute in promotion acitivities i.e. test marketing requested. Bottlers also play an important role in negotiating cooperative merchandising agreements with retailers i.e. retailers agreeing to specified promitional activity and discount levels in exchange for a payment from the bottler i.e. bottlers have a final say in decisions concerning retail pricing, new packaging, selling ads etc. In 2000 the distribution of CSDs in the US took place through food stores (35%), fountain outlets (23%), vending machines (14%), convenience stores (9%) and other outlets (20%).
Both concentrate producers (CP) and bottlers are profitable. These two parts of the industry are extremely interdependent, sharing costs in procurement, production, marketing and distribution. Many of their functions overlap; for instance, CPs do some bottling, and bottlers conduct many promotional activities. The industry is already vertically integrated to some extent. They also deal with similar suppliers and buyers. Entry into the industry would involve developing operations in either or both disciplines. Beverage substitutes would threaten both CPs and their associated bottlers. Because of operational overlap and similarities in their market environment, we can include both CPs and bottlers in our definition of the soft drink industry. In 1993, CPs earned 29% pretax profits on their sales, while bottlers earned 9% profits on their sales, for a total industry profitability of 14% (Exhibit 1). This industry as a whole generates positive economic profits.
Control of market share is the key issue in this case study. The situation is both Coke and Pepsi are trying to gain market share in this beverage market, which is valued at over $30 billion a year. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. The facts are that each company is coming up with new products and ideas in order to increase their market share.
Super markets like wall mart, Costco, etc. has huge buying power to sell and attract customers for CSD products. But, due to high level of competition among CSD and to compete against retail store brand, bottlers always fought for store shelves space, which came to them at a cost. Competition among CSD drinks, gave bottlers less bargaining power and making this Industry force a weaker force in less favor of
PepsiCo’s produces most of the popular drink names: Pepsi, Diet Pepsi, Pepsi Max, Tropicana, Gatorade, 7up, Mountain Dew, Lipton Brisk, Aquafina, Amp, SoBe, and Starbucks bottled beverages. But in the 2012 the main focus for PepsiCo was to draw more attention to their products Pepsi, Diet Pepsi, and Pepsi Max. Through the marketing campaign they have designed ways where the consumers can win prizes through interacting with PepsiCo’s social media components and promotion. Also, the Ultimate Taste Challenge is where PepsiCo sends out street teams to attract the consumers to attend; this is another promotional strategy. Actual cost was not a focus for PepsiCo in 2012; their main goal was to reach more of their market and increasing their sales. The only “price” mentioned in the case is the time the buyer wi...
Every day , Puerto Rico is slowly adapting into the American way of life and is gradually losing what is left of their culture. Perhaps this is because Puerto Rico is a commonwealth of the United States. The poem “ Coca Cola and Coco Frio” by Martin Espada is a great example of someone who encounters the Americanized culture of Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico is struggling to preserve their own identity.
Pepsi and Coca-Cola are both sodas, but they differ in terms of the satisfying flavors, the color and the graphic design that represents their two products, and then how Coke makes more money than Pepsi. With that said, you should have gotten the ideology of what we will go further in discussing about. Everybody loves these two very well-known sodas which can inject caffeine into you, which makes you all jittery in filling you up with an energetic energy. Alright, enough of this, let's go straight in-depth in talking about the two rivals throughout this paper of how Pepsi beats Coke in sales, but Coke is usually ahead when it comes to annual net income (Feigin) or how Pepsi is a sweeter brand compared to Coke, though Coke brand is more valuable
In order to understand the situation of Cadbury-Schweppes in the CSD industry, the product, which is soda, needs to be analyzed.
Investments in marketing and advertisement are aimed to enhance consumer awareness and increase brand preference. This produces long-term growth in annual turnover, per capita consumption and coke’s share valve worldwide and their sales. Maintaining Strong relationships with bottling partners and products sellers in the mark...
Coca Cola was first founded back in the 1880’s. It was developed as an American iconic brand recognized for high quality and consistency. During this period a demand for recognition of the brand name was important for the company. Coca Cola met these demands with its red and white logo packaging and brand marketing to encourage consumers that the Coca Cola would taste the same anywhere else it was purchased. These marketing strategies became the foundation for Co...
Coca - Cola : Claims, Values and Polices Coca-Cola is a well-known and cherished brand name. When people think of this name, memories tend to overflow in their heads. Why do you need to be a member? Because, not only does Coke taste great and refresh your own personal memories, it also fills you with memories of the Coca-Cola like "Always Coca-Cola", the antics of the Coke polar bears, and all of the different ads that have represented Coke over the years. Just about every ad you see, as a consumer, has tons of hidden meanings.
The case study "Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century" focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital. This analysis of the Cola Wars Continue case study will focus mainly on the profitability of the industry by carefully considering and analyzing the below questions:
Coca-Cola started out small in Atlanta, once as a Candler started the Coca-Cola company he " begun an active and innovative marketing campaign that spurred the wide distribution of Coke across the United States." Once he had this going he had to strategically plan on how to bottle his soft drink and get it ready for shipping. Once the product was bottled he had to plan on how his product would be distributed. "In 1899 the Coca-Cola company first signed a bottling contract, As a Candler did not believe bottling would be successful and sold the bottling rights to Benjamin Thomas and Joseph Whitehead." They successfully bottled the Coca-Cola product. Now that bottling and shipping the product wasn't the issue, Coca-Cola was shipped throughout the Un...