Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pepsi vs. coke comparison
The case study of pepsi cola and coca cola
Comparing and contasting to coke vs. pepsi
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pepsi vs. coke comparison
In 1886 Coca-Cola was first formulated and in 1893 Pepsi-Cola was invented. It was during the time of the Great Depression when the competition between these two products truly began. Pepsi cut the price of its 12-oz bottle to 5 cents – which is what Coke was charging for their 6.5-oz bottle. During this time Pepsi competed directly with Coke and marketed to consumers that they were “twice as much for a nickel, too.” The most intense competition between the two CSD companies occurred during the years of 1975 - 1990s where Coke and Pepsi fought over the $66 billion industry. As CSD consumption rose steadily year after year, both Coke and Pepsi were achieving average annual revenue growth of 10%. The production and distribution of CSDs involved concentrate producers, bottlers, retail channels, and suppliers; concentrate producers and bottlers being the most prominent of these four participants. A concentrate producer’s most significant costs were for advertising, promotion, market research, and bottler support. The bottling process was capital-intensive and involved high-speed production lines that were interchangeable only for products of similar type and size.
The first success factor for the CSD industry started in 1893 with the idea that CSDs were “a potion for mental disorders”. Simply selling the product without attaching additional value for the customer may have been a complete failure for CSDs. Instead, it was marketed as something more than just satisfying thirst. This continued in the 1920’s when Coke initiated a “lifestyle” campaign linking the role that Coke played in a consumer’s life. In 1963, Pepsi launched their “Pepsi Generation” campaign targeting the young and “young at heart”. The ability to link a “lifestyle” to the CSD was a major success. Throughout the 1970’s the consumption of CSDs grew and a key success of both Coke and Pepsi was their ability to increase the availability of CSDs and introduce diet and flavoured varieties, which resulted in new product’s being delivered to consumers regularly; keeping them very interested in the product. Another key success factor of both Coke and Pepsi bottlers was their decision to offer direct store door delivery; route delivery salespeople managed the CSD brand in stores by securing shelf space, stacking CSD products, positioning the brand’s trademark label, and setting up end-of-aisle displays. This personal brand management was a key success to both Coke and Pepsi, and to the CSD industry as a whole, as it ensured that each brand was being properly managed at the store level.
Coke continuously out-stands Pepsi, even though they share a very similar taste and colour, however Coke should not be the drink that receives all the love and attention for what it offers. Despite their similar soda colour, the drinks actually contain some different ingredients, which produce a different taste, and affect the body differently. Furthermore, the way the companies markets their drinks makes a huge contribution to how successful their products will become. The major element for success however stems from their impact on society and how the companies utilize their social power to evolve. The two major soda companies are constantly head to head with one another, yet it is what they do that sets them apart.
Analysis of the carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry shows that there are 2 important players i.e. Concentrate Producers and Bottlers. Focusing on the downstream of the supply chain it is to be pointed out that concentrate producers incure relatively low fixed costs with respect to production plant, staff, equipment and R&D as the concentrate is produced of a more than 100 years old formula and relatively cheap raw material (e.g. caffeine). Concentrate is shipped to bottlers which incure relatively high fixed cost with respect to plant, equipment and staff and which add carbonated water and high fructose corn syrup to the concentrate, bottle or can, package and ship it to the respective retailer. Besides that CDS hold a big stake in the direct delivery of concentrate to diverse fountain accounts like McDonalds, Burger King etc.
Every day , Puerto Rico is slowly adapting into the American way of life and is gradually losing what is left of their culture. Perhaps this is because Puerto Rico is a commonwealth of the United States. The poem “ Coca Cola and Coco Frio” by Martin Espada is a great example of someone who encounters the Americanized culture of Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico is struggling to preserve their own identity.
People can afford to buy more soft drinks under current economic situation. Recessions do not seem to affect sales of CSD. Although produced by main market players soft carbonated drinks cost more than similar products of local and private label manufacturers, consumers are willing to pay an extra price for the name, particular taste, and image. Fierce competition in CSD industry forces Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to expand into new and emerging markets which present high potential for the company’s development. However, some foreign markets proved to be highly competitive. Coca-Cola Company’s operation in China faced antitrust regulations, advertising restrictions, and foreign exchange control.
Coca-Cola was formulated by John S.Pemberton, originally as a cocawine called Pemberton's French Wine Coca, and originally sold as a patent medicine for five cents a glass at soda fountains, which were popular in America due to a contemporary view that soda water was good for your health. Coca-Cola is the trademarked name, registered in 1893, for a popular soft drink sold in stores, restaurants and vending machines around the world.
Both concentrate producers (CP) and bottlers are profitable. These two parts of the industry are extremely interdependent, sharing costs in procurement, production, marketing and distribution. Many of their functions overlap; for instance, CPs do some bottling, and bottlers conduct many promotional activities. The industry is already vertically integrated to some extent. They also deal with similar suppliers and buyers. Entry into the industry would involve developing operations in either or both disciplines. Beverage substitutes would threaten both CPs and their associated bottlers. Because of operational overlap and similarities in their market environment, we can include both CPs and bottlers in our definition of the soft drink industry. In 1993, CPs earned 29% pretax profits on their sales, while bottlers earned 9% profits on their sales, for a total industry profitability of 14% (Exhibit 1). This industry as a whole generates positive economic profits.
When one thinks of Coca-Cola products, the first thought tends to be of die – hard fans*. Individuals in society cannot go a day without a Coke*. And while Diet Coke has been a leading sugar-free soft drink since it was first released, it came to light that young adult males shied away from this beverage*. This is due to men classifying Diet Cola as a woman’s drink. Men have a conventional look of associating woman with “wanting to be beautiful and thin”*. Not only does Coke Zero have to change the target markets perceptions but there are many competitors who are nearly identical. Where there are innovative products, there are substitutes. Pepsi Max and Jive Lite are the two competitors of Coke Zero. In order for Coke Zero to continue being consumers first choice, they need to consider the factors that influence the decision making process in the cluttered marketplace externally and internally.
The CSD (carbonated soft drink) industry is one that is very competitive. A few firms dominate this industry, most notably Coca Cola and Pepsi Cola. This is due to substantial barriers to entry. Cadbury-Schweppes, producer of products such as 7up and Dr. Pepper is the third leading company in this industry. Due to the dominance of Coca Cola and Pepsi, Cadbury-Schweppes faces the daunting task of having to fight for market share and survive in this fiercely competitive industry. Using economic analysis for support, Cadbury-Schweppes will need to use its strengths in the non-cola categories to compete in this CSD industry.
Super markets like wall mart, Costco, etc. has huge buying power to sell and attract customers for CSD products. But, due to high level of competition among CSD and to compete against retail store brand, bottlers always fought for store shelves space, which came to them at a cost. Competition among CSD drinks, gave bottlers less bargaining power and making this Industry force a weaker force in less favor of
Investments in marketing and advertisement are aimed to enhance consumer awareness and increase brand preference. This produces long-term growth in annual turnover, per capita consumption and coke’s share valve worldwide and their sales. Maintaining Strong relationships with bottling partners and products sellers in the mark...
Coca-Cola started out small in Atlanta, once as a Candler started the Coca-Cola company he " begun an active and innovative marketing campaign that spurred the wide distribution of Coke across the United States." Once he had this going he had to strategically plan on how to bottle his soft drink and get it ready for shipping. Once the product was bottled he had to plan on how his product would be distributed. "In 1899 the Coca-Cola company first signed a bottling contract, As a Candler did not believe bottling would be successful and sold the bottling rights to Benjamin Thomas and Joseph Whitehead." They successfully bottled the Coca-Cola product. Now that bottling and shipping the product wasn't the issue, Coca-Cola was shipped throughout the Un...
Thanks to my fascination with PepsiCo and partly because this is an assignment, I went online and search for some of PepsiCo’s most successful and ongoing marketing campaigns and strategies. During my research I noticed several daring marketing strategies Pepsi employed throughout the years. For example, gaining the support of Michael Jackson in the 1980’s and latest gaining the endorsement of global pop star Beyoncé.
Coca Cola was first founded back in the 1880’s. It was developed as an American iconic brand recognized for high quality and consistency. During this period a demand for recognition of the brand name was important for the company. Coca Cola met these demands with its red and white logo packaging and brand marketing to encourage consumers that the Coca Cola would taste the same anywhere else it was purchased. These marketing strategies became the foundation for Co...
Coca - Cola : Claims, Values and Polices Coca-Cola is a well-known and cherished brand name. When people think of this name, memories tend to overflow in their heads. Why do you need to be a member? Because, not only does Coke taste great and refresh your own personal memories, it also fills you with memories of the Coca-Cola like "Always Coca-Cola", the antics of the Coke polar bears, and all of the different ads that have represented Coke over the years. Just about every ad you see, as a consumer, has tons of hidden meanings.
Pepsi and Coca-Cola are both sodas, but they differ in terms of the satisfying flavors, the color and the graphic design that represents their two products, and then how Coke makes more money than Pepsi. With that said, you should have gotten the ideology of what we will go further in discussing about. Everybody loves these two very well-known sodas which can inject caffeine into you, which makes you all jittery in filling you up with an energetic energy. Alright, enough of this, let's go straight in-depth in talking about the two rivals throughout this paper of how Pepsi beats Coke in sales, but Coke is usually ahead when it comes to annual net income (Feigin) or how Pepsi is a sweeter brand compared to Coke, though Coke brand is more valuable