Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Scientific development in society
Life science essay of genetic engineering and cloning
The impact of science on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Scientific development in society
GATTACA
Many different stories have been told about science fiction movies, especially about cloning and genetic engineering. The 1997 movie, “Gattaca” is a science fiction movie about one-man’s dream to go to a star. This movie is about the “near future” and how bio-identity can make distinctions in persons physical and mental abilities, Vincent Freeman (Ethan Hawke) was born as a genetically imperfect man. Society has labeled Vincent as less than suitable, given his genetic make-up and he has become one of the underclass of humans that are only useful for basic jobs. Vincent is a dreamer, he always dreams about going to space, which he always thought as his destiny. His genetic identity was holding him back from reaching his goal unless he can take someone else’s identity.
Vincent got this opportunity when a doctor approached him. Vincent thought to move ahead and fulfill his dream in life, he has to take the identity of Jerome Morrow (Jude Law), a former swimming star who, regardless of a genetic profile "second to none", won a silver medal in a very prestigious swimming competition. He then attempted to commit suicide by jumping in front of a car, but again fell short of his aim, paralyzing himself from the waist down. Since, this incident occurred outside the country, no one knows of his disability. He wanted to maintain his lifestyle and keep his identity alive and he asks Vincent to "buy" his identity. Vincent could not refuse this offer and thus went a head and made the deal. This was not easy, Vincent has to go through physical changes in his personality, he had to do orthopedic surgery to increase his height, practice writing from his right hand instead of his left, and wear contact lenses to replace his glasses wh...
... middle of paper ...
...s, directly affecting our choices in the way we dress, talk and behave in society. Mis-representation of any improvement whether in medical science or technology could send a wrong message to the society. As an example in the movie “Gattaca”, it is shown that technology was so advanced that upon birth, one could get all the information regarding a person’s physical and mental health. Vincent proves that if you have a dream and follow your dream, you may one day find yourself living your dream with the help or in spite of technology. In the movie “The Island” no matter how far the advancement of science with regards to human cloning goes, you cannot play with human values. People cloning themselves for use as an organ bank cannot make wrong ideas or actions right. Scientists should have moral values when it comes to science and cloning and know when to draw the line.
In “Jennifer and Rachel,” Lee M. Silver argues that reproductive cloning deems permissible to those who encourage it, as opposed to those who reject it and don’t want to run the risk of how they’ll look in the eyes of society. Jennifer, an independent career driven woman, believes that the best way to have a baby of her own at her age is by cloning. Silver’s description of the cloning procedure is done by retrieving cells from the willing adult; prepare the cells for merging to unfertilized eggs, and then the embryos that develop successfully will be introduced to the uterus of the willing adult. Jennifer partakes in the cloning procedure and it was successful. Nine months later on March 15, 2050, Rachel was born.
In the movie Gattaca, the doctor said that Vincent would have heart failure and was looked down upon because of his disability. In the society today people would not like to be without control of their own life. In the book Brave New World and in the film Gattaca, both societies use genetic engineering to create the character’s destiny without the approval of the beholder.
This film is serious; both far-fetched and realistic, bleak in setting but finally unresolved, hopeful even, striking a powerful chord with its searching, struggling characters. Crucial aspects of the human condition are here on display in surely what is a fine creation. This essay does not include the vast religious parallels that can be read into the characters and their actions eg. the replicants as fallen angels returning to Earth to confront their maker, Batty as a symbol of mankind, Deckard as God's agent of death and Sebastian as an intermediary Jesus Christ.
Identity is often thought of as what people consider themselves, not how others see you. In the movie “Gattaca” however this is not the case. Identity is something you are born with. When you were born you were tested for diseases and life expectancy and therefore treated accordingly. In the world where technology has been fast forwarded to be able to pick which genes or gender your child inherits and becomes to create the best possible outcome, kids that were not genetically changed were called “invalid.”
Children grow up watching movies such as Star Wars as well as Gattaca that contain the idea of cloning which usually depicts that society is on the brink of war or something awful is in the midsts but, with todays technology the sci-fi nature of cloning is actually possible. The science of cloning obligates the scientific community to boil the subject down into the basic category of morality pertaining towards cloning both humans as well as animals. While therapeutic cloning does have its moral disagreements towards the use of using the stem cells of humans to medically benefit those with “incomplete” sets of DNA, the benefits of therapeutic cloning outweigh the disagreements indubitably due to the fact that it extends the quality of life for humans.
Science is not inherently evil and never will become evil. Though the knowledge gained from science can be used toward producing evil, intended or not, and can be dangerous. The story of Victor Frankenstein shows the irresponsibility possible in the advancement of science and furthers the caution which humanity must take when it attempts to master its environment or itself. The proponents of cloning humans today should remind themselves of the lesson which Victor Frankenstein before they have to deal with the products of their research and learn the hard way.
Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, started out as an intelligent young man that increasingly grew into an even more curious young man. His interest in the human body and creating life became almost became an obsession for him. He was determined to do what he needed to do in order to create the most incredible clone of a human. Victor went to great lengths to complete this occupation of his that took up nearly all of his time, including many nights of visiting the graveyards studying the human corpses. Getting the body parts was the easy part of this upcoming creation, it was going to be all the sleepless days and nights trying to create the veins, blood vessels, etc., that would be the challenging part of this whole ordeal.
Human cloning is one of the most controversial subjects in modern times. Supporters claim that cloning is a great advance in science and can lead to great discoveries and medical breakthroughs. Opponents feel that cloning is a threat to human individuality and is potentially disastrous. Both sides make reasonable arguments, however I feel that Wesley takes things a bit too far in his grim outlook on the future of humanity. Sure, there are downsides to cloning, and yes it can be dangerous if it is used for the wrong purposes. This is true with almost any new technology. From gunpowder to cars to airplanes to computers to the Internet; any one of these technologies can be harnessed for negative purposes. Despite the risks involved however, all of these technologies have improved our standard of living and quality of life, and I feel cloning will do the same.
Gattaca is a movie with different kinds of identities. It is about a man, Vincent , changing his life around for the better. In the movie Jerome was a man who was genetically engineered for perfection but had obstacles that held him back in life. The three identites that pretains to the movie is identity acheviement, identity foreclosure, and identity moratorium.
By comparing the life of “Jerome” to the life of Vincent, viewers are able to guage just how severe the dehumanization of
Niccol presents Vincent Freeman, the protagonist as a representative of those who are born naturally, therefore he is seen as imperfect and ‘invalid’, no matter how hard he attempts and holds a bigger dream than ‘valids’ who had their genes selected so they could be as perfect as possible, yet he is never accepted and treated as inferior, second-class citizens. For instance, ‘invalids’ are confronted with restrictions in their ability to choose their occupation; the dystopian society only allows Vincent to perform menial jobs. This is reinforced in two ironic quotes “no matter how much I lied in my resume, the real resume was in my genes,” and “the best test score in the world would not matter unless I had the blood test to go with it”. Systematic discrimination has been continuously reinforced. It is indicated by the continuous identity check scenes (such as blood, urine and air tests) shown in the film. Additionally, GATTACA dramatically argues that mankind is more than their “genetic potential” and portrays the significance of human spirit. In a society instructed by rules and conventions, it is only through power and determination that Vincent, the underdog, is able to achieve his dreams. His
“Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.” (Kass) The concept of cloning continues to evoke debate, raising extensive ethical and moral controversy. As humans delve into the fields of science and technology, cloning, although once considered infeasible, could now become a reality. Although many see this advancement as the perfect solution to our modern dilemmas, from offering a potential cure for cancer, AIDS, and other irremediable diseases, its effects are easily forgotten. Cloning, especially when concerning humans, is not the direction we must pursue in enhancing our lives. It is impossible for us to predict its effects, it exhausts monetary funds, and it harshly abases humanity.
So Vincent is left with only one choice: to take on the identity of Jerome Morrow (Jude Law), a cripple who has ideal genetics. Ironically it is technology that allows Vincent to succeed, but it is technology that first lead to Vincent’s grievances. The separation between the two social groups is seen here when Vincent, under the guise of Jerome, is given an interview at Gattaca. Vincent is shocked to find out that the interview is essentially just a genetic test. Nothing about Vincent (or in this case Jerome) matters; from his past achievements, to his skills and work ethic.
Imagine yourself in a society in which individuals with virtually incurable diseases could gain the essential organs and tissues that perfectly match those that are defected through the use of individual human reproductive cloning. In a perfect world, this could be seen as an ideal and effective solution to curing stifling biomedical diseases and a scarcity of available organs for donation. However, this approach in itself contains many bioethical flaws and even broader social implications of how we could potentially view human clones and integrate them into society. Throughout the focus of this paper, I will argue that the implementation of human reproductive cloning into healthcare practices would produce adverse effects upon family dynamic and society due to its negative ethical ramifications. Perhaps the most significant conception of family stems from a religious conception of assisted reproductive technologies and cloning and their impact on family dynamics with regard to its “unnatural” approach to procreation. Furthermore, the broader question of the ethical repercussions of human reproductive cloning calls to mind interesting ways in which we could potentially perceive and define individualism, what it means to be human and the right to reproduction, equality and self-creation in relation to our perception of family.
In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of “Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?” John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.