Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Difference between countryside life and city life
Similarity between life in a city and rural area
Difference between countryside life and city life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Difference between countryside life and city life
The majority of people can remember the time they first heard the tale of “The Town Mouse and the City Mouse,” but nowadays, the paradigms once expressed by the revered Aesop may not reflect the advancements made by society, which have changed lifestyles in both the cities, and the rural country areas. While there are many advocates on both ends of the spectrum, a clear consensus has never truly been reached. While the city is clearly favorable in terms of ease of access, city life triumphs when it comes to costs of living; however, country life cannot provide the diverse experiences city life may, though at the expense of environmental factors.
Availability of resources, be it healthcare, education, or things as simple as groceries, is definitely much more streamlined in the city than in the country. Rural areas may require a person driving miles just to reach their closest neighbor, whereas in a city, there is often a surplus of people located a few steps away. Additionally, in a country, healthcare and emergency medical services may be difficult to come by, if dispersed sparsely throughout the country, while hospitals are easily accessible from most areas of a city. Furthermore, education in cities trumps any potential excellence a homeschooling program can breed. City schools are greatly regulated, and provide a comprehensive education. Then comes the matter of day-to-day commodities, such a gasoline to fuel a car or groceries from the supermarket. In a city, there is usually a convenience store within walking distance, and restaurants close by. In comparison, in the country, it may take an excessive length of time just to find the nearest gas station, and dining out at a restaurant faraway can be almost considered a road t...
... middle of paper ...
...to grow up in. The air is free of potentially carcinogenic substances and smog, while the produce is more likely to be organic and free of harmful pesticides. Country lifestyles are more in touch with nature and farming as well. This means there is a lower occurrence of allergies, and a safer, cleaner environment. Country places are much safer, and there is more privacy in general, though this may be contested.
All in all, both the city lifestyle and the country lifestyle have their respective perspectives, each with their own positive and detrimental factors. While the city life involves easier accessibility to essential services and an appealing range of experiences, the country life is much less expensive and naturally a better environment. All in all, the tale of “The Town Mouse and the City Mouse” provides only one side of a story that has no clear consensus.
While many people continue to live their lives in cities, some may come to the impression that they are “wasteful.” The individual who strives to do their best to eventually reach their dreams, and gain the material things they desire might not seem very effective, compared to the one who is content with their simple, more “pure” life in some vast land away from the city. However, there is a better chance of seeing more people like the former rather than the latter. Certainly, most people today do not live on farms, vacant marshes, or vast deserts, and instead live in cities. Most often, those people would avoid living in such provincial places because of their distinct conditions. Although if we were to determine which type of life is more
With such industrialization and the grit and grime of the city life, city planners decided that more “green space” was needed in the most centralized locations. This included small parks, ornate flower gardens, planting of trees, and lush vegetation. These areas of supposed relaxation and tranquility were highly controlled, though, and were illusions of the rural lifestyle, designed to distract citizens from dirty life and allow them to practice good manners and remain solitary.
...healthy life conditions including clean drinking water, sanitation, regular garbage pick-up and medical care as picture 13 illustrate. The local government makes sure the streets of towns and cities are cleaned regularly as image 14 and 15 show .The working class people live in apartments with plenty of windows, as image 16 demonstrate in a healthy condition with parks and recreational areas close to them. Modern cities as in picture 17, offer comfortable and safe lifestyle for workers and their families. Engineers bring nature at the door of the modern appartments as in image 18 demonstrates with lots of sunshine and fresh air.
...nd in very different parts of the country. My experience points to the fact that one is not better than the other…simply different. Both the city and the country have great things to offer, and they both have disadvantages; it all depends on what a person is looking for in their life.
setting being in the city rather than a small town, is that the cities often have many people
Again, this section will give a working definition of the “urban question’. To fully compare the political economy and ecological perspectives a description of the “urban question” allows the reader to better understand the divergent schools of thought. For Social Science scholars, from a variety of disciplines, the “urban question” asks how space and the urban or city are related (The City Reader, 2009). The perspective that guides the ecological and the social spatial-dialect schools of thought asks the “urban question” in separate distinct terminology. Respected scholars from the ecological mode of thinking, like Burgess, Wirth and others view society and space from the rationale that geographical scope determines society (The City Reader, 2009). The “urban question” that results from the ecological paradigm sees the relationship between the city (space) as influencing the behaviors of individuals or society in the city. On the other hand...
to visit your neighbor can be rewarding. On the flip side, city life breeds a more dangerous lifestyle and leaves no chance for getting to know your fellow townsfolk.
Living in the City vs. Living in the Country The age-old question has plagued many, “Should I live in a city or should I live in the country?”. There are many advantages and disadvantages to choosing a lifestyle in either setting, and careful examination of all aspects is needed to make the perfect decision for you. One major issue affecting many people trying to make the decision on where to live is their quality of life in either extreme. Health, education, and transportation are three major concerns that many consider.
There are numerous differences between living in a small town or a big city. Small towns and big cities each have their unique advantages and disadvantages. Where a person grows up plays an integral part in shaping their personality. And, sometimes a person’s personality can have a great impact on their preference of where to live. Preferring a small town or big city is a very individual matter. Different people have different reasons for favoring one over the other. Personally, and admitting that my views are shaped by my personal experiences, I believe the advantages of growing up in a small town – as long as that small town is in reasonably close proximity to a decent sized city.
Urban living like suburban living has positive and negative characteristics. The homes found in urban areas are primarily lower class. The absence of extra money creates an environment with more crime and run-down neighborhoods. In inner cities, the homes are found feet from each other. Since people live so close together, it causes the environment to be more disruptive and creates a less peaceful atmosphere. Having neighbors so close by in dangerous neighborhoods can also be a safety feature. It is easier to get help in emergencies if your neighbors are nearby. This may influence a person's decision on living in urban areas.
Generally speaking, life in the city is more hectic and clamorous. While a vast majority of Americans pack themselves into our major cities, there are still millions who live outside of the cities. Certainly, there are a lot more activities in the city: shopping malls and restaurants galore, thrift stores, libraries, and concert...
The Negative Effects of Urbanization on People and their Environment As our world becomes increasingly globalized, numerous people travel to urban areas in search of economic prosperity. As a consequence of this, cities in periphery countries expand at rates of 4 to 7 percent annually. Many cities offer entrepreneurs the potential for resources, labor, and resources. With prosperity, cities also allow the freedom of a diversity of ways of life and manners (Knox & Marston, 2012). However, in the quest to be prosperous, increasing burdens are placed on our health and the condition of our environment.
As previously implied, cities are currently the antithesis of even the barest sense of sustainability. To succinctly define the term “sustainability” would be to say that it represents living within one’s needs. When it comes to the city, with almost zero local sources of food or goods, one’s means is pushed and twisted to include resources originating far beyond the boundaries of the urban landscape. Those within cities paradoxically have both minimal and vast options when it comes to continuing their existence, yet this blurred reality is entirely reliant on the resources that a city can pull in with its constantly active economy.
Urbanization occurs naturally from individual and corporate efforts to cut time and cost in commuting and transportation while improving opportunities for jobs, education, housing, and transportation. Living in cities allows individuals and families to take advantage of the opportunities of proximity, diversity, and marketplace competition. People began moving into cities to seek economic opportunities.
Urbanization is the process of becoming a city or intensification of urban elements. Since modernization, the meaning of urbanization mostly became the transformation that a majority of population living in rural areas in the past changes to a majority living in urban areas. However, urbanization differs between the developed and developing world in terms of its cause and the level of its negative outcomes. Korea, as one of the developing countries, experienced what is called ‘ overurbanization,’ and it experienced a number of negative consequences of it, although it could achieve a great economic development by it. This paper examines how urbanization differs between the West and the rest of the world, the characteristics and process of urbanization in Korea, problems sprung from its extreme urbanization, and government policies coping with population distribution.