Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges faced in organizational behaviour
Social psychology altruism
Social psychology altruism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenges faced in organizational behaviour
CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
2.1: Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)
Organizational citizenship behavior is a term that encompasses anything positive and constructive the employees do, of their own volition, which supports their co-workers as well as the organization. Employees who are engaged in OCB may not always be the top performers, but they are the ones who are known to ‘go the extra mile’ or ‘go above and beyond’ the minimum efforts required to do a merely satisfactory job. Organizations will benefit from encouraging employees into OCB because it is linked to many advantages such as, increased productivity, higher customer satisfaction and much more.
2.1.1 – Definitions of Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) has undergone many complex definitional revisions, since the term was coined in the late 1980s, but the construct remains the same at its core.
Social science since long observed certain altruistic behaviors that seem to integrate human values with service to be endowed. Schwartz (1977) argued that altruistic behaviors occur when individuals hold personnel norms with regard to specific behavior. These norms are moderated by the awareness of the result of engaging or not engaging with specific behavior. Karp (1996) adds that individual values can influence behavior when moderated by situational concern. Professor Dennis Organ and his colleagues also made a similar observation that behavior is influenced by values and moderated by situational concerns in an organizational setting. Organ called it Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) and defined it as, “individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward syste...
... middle of paper ...
...e future, for the service rendered, even though there is no formal mechanism to do so.
Employment relationships may have economic and social exchange. When it is an economic exchange, employees receive only contractual inducements and they are likely to confine their contributions to those prescribed by the contract. When the employment relationship is a social exchange, employees receive positive, beneficial treatments from the organization. This in turn creates obligations on the part of employees to reciprocate in positive beneficial ways (Settoon et al., 1996). Since OCB is generally discretionary, it is a social resource that can be exchanged by individuals, who have been the recipients of social rewards (Foa & Foa, 1980; Moorman, 1991). Therefore when the employment relationship is a social exchange, employees are more likely to engage in OCB (Organ, 1988).
McShane, S.L., Olekalns, M. & Travaglione, A. 2013, Organizational Behavior: Emerging Knowledge, Global Insights 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, Sydney.
“Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior” was based significantly off of the findings of the study done by David De Cremer called “Why Prosocials Exhibit Greater Cooperation then Proselfs: The Roles of Social Responsibility and Reciprocity.” Both studies preliminarily tested the college students with a social value orientation test to classify the participants as either prosocial or proself. Next, the participants participated in series of “games” that differed in each study. De Cremer used scenarios that allowed the participant to decide how many chips (a made up source of perceived value) they wanted to contribute to either a group or partner, followed by an inquiry as to how responsible they felt to “further the collective interest.” This study aimed to understand the different behaviors and feelings associated with being prosocial or proself. For example, it was found that a prosocial feel more socially responsible and want to restore equality in outcomes of situations, therefore increasing their tendency to behave cooperatively. The “Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity” study went through scenarios in which the participants would participate in “dictator games” in which they were given two opportunities to help another person, once in public the other in private. This study aimed to explain why certain people behave in prosocial ways. For example, the study found that altruists were more likely to
Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., & Campbell, T. T. (2010). Organizational behavior. Pearson education.
One of the primary causes of prosocial behavior is altruism. Altruism is when an individual behaves in a prosocial manner without any expectation of something in return. In a 2012 scholarly journal published by Osama Hazzi and Issa Maldoon of Damascus University, it was stated the altruism in the workplace is “discretionary behavior that has the effect of helping a specific other person with an organizationally relevant task”. The ideas of prosocial
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Organization behavior. (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, United States of America: Pearson Prentise Hall.
Altruistic behavior “predisposes us to care for and help others” (Boss, p. 76) and is seen early on in life. When other
A company's understanding and use of organizational behavior concepts can make or break it. Just as important, if a company ignores these same concepts, it can easily spell disaster.
The Effect of Personal Characteristics on Prosocial Behaviour In this essay, it will be first looked at the effect personal characteristics have on Prosocial behaviour including the level of moral reasoning of individuals, vicarious emotional reactions, altruism, guilt, self concern, the Just World hypothesis and also the biological approach. Secondly it will be looked at how being part of a group can effect an individuals Prosocial behaviour. Intra-group factors that will be covered include the Bystander Effect, modelling and norms. Finally, factors concerning immediate and larger context will be covered. Prosocial behaviour is an act by an individual or a group that is seen as valued by society.
Organization citizenship behavior has been emerging as an interesting topic for any organization these days. Katz and Kahn (1996) were the first people to identify this kind of autonomous behavior in workplace. The term Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB’s) was first coined by Dennis Organ and his colleagues (Cf. Bateman & Organ, 1983; Smith Organ, & Near, 1983). Organ (1988: 4) defined Organizational citizenship behaviors as “individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization. By discretionary, we mean that the behavior is not an enforceable requirement of the role or the job description, that is, the clearly specifiable terms of the person’s employment contract with the organization; the behavior is rather a matter of personal choice, such that its omission is not generally understood as punishable.” Organizational citizenship behavior occurs when the individuals in organization implicitly go beyond the formal boundary of work required to do by him/her. Organization citizenship behavior can also be said to be the choice of individual to work beyond any limitation or expectations of their employers for the overall betterment of the organization. This is completely voluntary action and the employee’s work beyond the expectation of their organization. Organization citizenship behavior is gaining much attention in today’s organizations as it has several positive implications on the organizations. Organization citizenship behavior makes the employee more committed to the organization willingly and helps in promoting overall health of the organization. The employee...
Most interviews consist of many types of questions, but they usually lean toward situational interviews or behavior description interviews (Saylor. p. 133). According to Mary Clement, an American Association for Employment in Education award winner and author, “behavior-based interviewing (BBI) has the potential to improve the teacher hiring process, as questions in this style of interview focus on candidates’ past behaviors” (Clement. 2009) “so educators would be wise to craft interview questions that explore past experiences, skills, and behaviors of job candidates” (Phi Delta Kappan. 2009). She also states “questions should be open-ended ones that require candidates to describe their past experiences, while demonstrating they know what to
The culture of appreciating employees for their hard work and achievements by incentives shows how the organization values their employees. Lincoln believed “Status is of great importance in all human relationships. The greatest incentive that money has, usually, is that is it a symbol of success... The resulting status is the real incentive... Money alone can be an incentive to the miser only. There must be complete honesty and understanding between the hourly worker and management if high efficiency is to be obtained”. This shows how harmoniously the labor and management have to work together to produce
Moreover, to discover the influence of employee engagement on their organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention because of these leadership practices. Leadership
Organizational behavior is a field of study that investigates the impact that individuals, groups and structures have on behavior within an organization for the purpose of applying such knowledge towards improving an organization’s effectiveness. Organizational behavior is dependent upon many variables. It incorporates many areas of study such as psychology, sociology and anthropology. These disciplines are important in trying to manage new and existing challenges in the workplace. Two examples of current workplace challenges are workplace diversity and the constant struggle to balance work life and home life.
The relationship between personality and behavior. Does our personality cause the behavior to stay calm or go on a rampage? People all over the world have different types of disorders and a certain disorder is called a personality disorder. Arguments from researchers have been made whether or not with someone who has a personality disorder has anger problems and is a danger to others (Davison, 2012). Behavioral problems come from social-cultural influences such as presence of others, the media and peer influences (Myers, 2014).