Citizen Kane

600 Words2 Pages

An influential person and his downfall. That may be one of the best ways to describe Orsen Wells’ film Citizen Kane. Kane wants to have control of everything, but what happens, everything gets out of his hand. He loses everything. This analysis evaluates if Kane’s life passes the Aristotelian definition of tragedy.
Aristotle’s The Poetics defined tragedy as “… an imitation of an action that is serious,complete…”(1), it not a work that engages with the feeling of happiness. Tragic plots should be complete. It must have beginning,middle and end. The beginning where the story’s problem begins and results to cause-effect sequence, the middle where the most exciting part happens and lastly, ending, the resolution of the story. In additional, the denouement where matters in the plot are resolved. However, the movie starts with the death of Kane which is the opposite of what Aristotle said that the beginning should be less exciting. It is then followed by the scene where young Kane plays in the snow until he remarries with the young singer, Susan Alexander as the middle of the story, and the burning of his sled which leads to revelation of rosebud as denouement. This sequence doesn’t follow what Aristotle define, instead of ending the plot with …show more content…

He owns a newspaper business, he has a wife and a son, and he runs to the as independent governor. Unfortunately for him, as he grow old, he starts to lose what he had. He loses his first wife,his son, he didn’t win as a governor, he did get married with his second wife which, who tries to commit suicide. They soon move to his castle, but eventually, his second wife also left him for the reason, he didn’t gives her everything she care about. He was left alone in his palace and then dies. “Mister Kane was a man who got everything he wanted and then lost it”(2) . It is then successfully illustrates how Aristotle define reversal in a tragedy should

Open Document