Churlishness Vs Listening

Listening trumps speaking over an individual or a group of individuals. Listening passionately achieves a similar objective. Listening causes no bruised egos or pride, if an individual listened instead of talking over the teacher, the individual resolves by apologizing, with a bruised ego, and teacher resolved future conflicts by having punishments for churlish violators. Churlishness, while certain individuals find churlishness attractive, everyone else finds them annoying, as well as predictable.

Listening triumphs speaking, as cordialness triumphs churlishness. Cordialness requires listening as an active allotment, instead of churlish speaking. “Don’t be fooled into thinking that being heard is more important than hearing.” (Mike Myatt). Churlishness requires speaking over an individual already speaking. Said individual ranges from guest speakers, teachers, family, friends, acquaintances, or all around strangers. Churlishness produces restrictions upon multiple individuals, allotting the offender in addition to all individuals. Disrespecting an individual causes a vicious cycle of churlishness, which causes a cycle of speaking in lieu of listening.

Listening overcomes speaking as an unbarred mind is more susceptible to

alternative thoughts. Confined minds rebuffs opposing thoughts, exemplar debates two or more individuals argue for opposing sides, however if no one acknowledges an opposing side by listening, the debate moves in circles. “When someone is speaking to you, it’s easy to zone out and just focus on snippets of what they’re saying.”(Dustin Thomas). Individuals may find holes in conversations, debate, arguments, and disputes by listening through the voice of logic and reason. Listening calmly triumphs over speaking directly over someone passionately, as individuals may think of the speaker as plebian. Counterarguments cause an argument to variate towards who argues and listens superlative, hindering a counterargument is detrimental.
Once a conversation derails from a topic, the whole conversation becomes unhinged. Certain ticks annoy groups of individuals, an exemplar possibly occurs when an individual possess a voluminous amount of passion which will not be contained. Certain individuals possibly shut down conversations if passion rapidly bursts forth from an individual. “Simply broadcasting your message ad nauseum will not have the same result as engaging in meaningful conversation” (Mike Myatt). Individuals perhaps annoy others by speaking over one another, whether from passion or annoyance at the opposing individual. This causes other individuals to divert topics, as one will not fancy standing there screamed at passionately nor talked over.
Perhaps certain individuals argue speaking triumphs listening, as an argument, debate and conversation require speaking.

A conversation means nothing without speaking, conversation will not move forward nor backwards. Speaking passionately perhaps sparks a new light on the topic at hand. Passionately speaking possibly sparks excitement for a new conversationalist, or for a new argumental view. Nonetheless, a detrimental flaw of speaking trumps listening, every person reacts differently. Some individuals perceive an attack on their person, to their core beliefs because they assume passion means not listening. These individuals possibly lash out either verbally or physically, both of which cause rifts among friends, family and

acquaintances.
Listening triumphs over speaking, as passion swiftly and unexpectedly cause a shift of tone and topic by the boot of the other conversationalist. Groups of individuals perhaps take offense because opinions differ and neither listening well nor speaking well occurred, causing one side of an opinion to be heard and not the other. Counterarguments possibly not occur as one side of the conversation or argument will not be apparent. Churlishness occurs when individuals do not listen to one another, or talk over another. Churlishness of not listening causes the opposing individual feel like they are not apart of said conversation, as their opinion will not be heard.