Choosing an IFR Alternate
During our usual flight, we need to obey the rules that published by the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration), there are two flight rules that we use to fly every day, according to the weather conditions such as the ceiling and the visibility outside, one flight rule is VFR (visual flight rules) and the other one is IFR (instrument flight rules), every rule has its own limitations and requirements for their own daily use. Like the visual flight rules, we usually use it because it is convenient, it does not require too much knowledge, when the weather is good and the pilot has the certificate, we can go fly. But what about the instrument flight rules, when the weather cannot allow us to fly with visual flight rules, we need the instruments to fly.
First of all, let us talk a little about VFR. Here is the definition of VFR: Flight rules adopted by Federal Aviation Administration governing aircraft flight using visual references to fly the aircraft. VFR operations specify the amount of ceiling and the visibility the pilot must have in order to operate according to these rules. The weather conditions during VFR are generally clear and enough to allow the pilot to see where the plane is and what is going on outside the airplane, it can help the pilot to fly the airplane without or not often seeing inside the airplane. The time that pilot use to look outside during VFR can be up to 80 percent or 90 percent or more, when the weather conditions are not very good, like it is very cloudy and the ceiling is just 1000 feet high and the visibility is no more than 1 mile so that the pilot cannot fly according to VFR safely, he or she must use instrument flight r...
... middle of paper ...
...fore each of our flight, it is necessary for us to choose one or several alternate. This is helpful for our safety. There are many stories and a lot of people had been died since the recently 100 years because of not following the rules. We need to learn something from this, then we can avoid these things happening again, maybe it can save many people’s lives. Choosing an alternate airport, it is quite important for us during our flight. None of us can find out the things that will happen in the future, so we had better to be well prepared. We can choose an alternate airport every time before our flight, so if we have something wrong with the weather or aircraft, we still have many choices. It is quite useful for our flight.
As far as I am concerned, we need to prepare for the flight very well every time. We need to choose an alternate airport ,it is very important.
“To be the best airlines in whole world and providing excellent customer experience in our flights with full entertainment and loads of satisfaction.”
“What time should we leave? Two hours in advance? Three? Four?” Millions of people ask these questions each year before boarding a plane. Between driving, security, walking to the gate, and getting settled, boarding a plane exhausts travelers. But out of all of these different activities, one frustrates and restrains travelers the most: TSA security. People ask why they need all this security, complain about the inconvenience it causes, and ultimately annoys people to no end. Created after 9/11, Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, nationalized airport security, increased screening duration, and supposedly increases security on flights. However, statistics say these added security measures never come to fruition and potentially cost more lives than they save.
Ineffective Flight Readiness Review meetings: The reviews were not conducted properly and issues were ignored in the FRR
Airline of choice: Remain the top choice for international flights for premium customers as well a...
In order to effectively manage the national airspace system in the future we will need to implement Free Flight. Free Flight is a concept designed to enhance safety and efficiency of the airspace by allowing aircraft to choose their own route instead of using victor airways (www.ads-b.com 1). Along with this freedom there is still the problem of aircraft separation which when on an instrument flight plan is air traffic control's (ATC) responsibility. In free flight there may be areas where ATC cannot give the required collision avoidance necessary. In order to safely manage the safety zone around an aircraft, pilots will need to rely on systems installed in the aircraft for better separation.
According to the Air Safety Institute (ASI) (2014), during the past ten years, 264 accidents were caused by continued Visual Flight Rules (VFR) flight into Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC). Eighty-nine percent of these accidents were fatal causing hundreds of deaths. Despite initiatives by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) these statistics continue to be a concern for the aviation community. Previous quantitative research has focused on identification of causal factors, decision making process and new technology (Shappell & Wiegmann, 2009). Recent efforts have investigated and evaluated the effectiveness of safety programs intended to mitigate risks associated with weather (Shappell et. al, 2012).
Although Global Positioning technology has existed since the mid 1970’s, some of the most significant advancements have taken place within the last five years. In recent months, studies have been conducted by NASA and other institutions concerning the use of advanced GPS technology in both computer controlled flight of commercial aircraft and the establishment of “no-fly safety bubbles” around designated areas and buildings. In essence an aircraft’s computer system would override a manual command and not allow the craft to enter these designated areas. There are many possible benefits of this technology, but with any new advancement also comes ethical questions. While some believe this technology will increase air travel safety, others argue that misuse of this technology could lead to disaster and loss of life.
Before to select the proper alternative, three alternatives were analysed and evaluated under four decisions criteria: customer experience, cost, growth rate / market penetration and ease to implementation (See Exhibit 2: Factor Analysis). Between all the alternatives, it was suggested that Southwest Airlines enters to New York City by bidding the slots and gates at the LGA (See Exhibit 3: Alternatives Analysis). This alternative sustains the challenge of changing the customer experience which means adding more flights from and to the East; furthermore, entering to new markets will reinforce “the power of the network” through LGA. At the same time, this decision will allow signing more code-sharing agreements with other airlines flying to international destinations and offer new products and services to LUV customers as loyalty rewards, in-flight internet, onboard duty-free purchases, etc.; as a result of this, it will increase passenger’s insights and experiences by flying with Southwest Airlines. Nevertheless, there is potential risk by selecting this alternative, in the recent years the energy prices has had a huge increase affecting costs, fares and even capacity needed, however Southwest Airlines has been able to hedge fuel for decad...
Airports can be considered as important national resources of most countries in the world. The main responsibility of an airport is in transportation of people and goods and in internal and global business. They are where the nation’s aviation system connects with other modes of transportation and where state responsibility for managing and regulating air traffic operations intersects with the role of governments that own and operate most airports. However, most major airports are owned and operated by the private sectors. This is due to several reasons such as to improve efficiency and economic performance, be more competitive as well as to maximize the community’s return from the airport assets in which public enterprise found out to be less efficient in term of its production and management.
International airlines are greatly affected by trade relations that their country has with others. Unless governments of the two countries trade with each other, there could be restrictions of flying into particular area leading to a loss of potential air traffic (e.g. Pakistan & India)
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) were first established in the 1930s in response to the historical stock market crash in 1929. Nowadays GAAP is influenced by several organizations including the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (FASAC), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Publicly trade companies are required to follow GAAP in the United States. Many other countries have their own set of accounting principles. In today’s global business climate, many businesses need to grow in order to survive. A small business may choose to merge with a bigger another company, and a large company may want to acquire a small company in order to expand in certain condition. More and more international mergers and acquisitions are happening nowadays. But how would they adapt to the ever-changing accounting standards in different countries? There are complications of consolidation of the financial statements when companies make merger/acquisition deal. To be able to adapt to the new business environment, GAAP is also making changes. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) were first developed by the International Accounting Standard Board in 1973. IFRS gained its popularity quickly. Nowadays, over 100 countries recognize IFRS. As the biggest economy in the world, United States (United Nations 2012); however, did not plan to implement IFRSs until 2011. In this paper, we will discuss the possibilities of future of convergence between U.S GAAP and IFRS.
If you could just figure out where that is, then find the closest airport.” “I can do that for you, but that would take a long time. How about you to customer service and get your location there,” said the lady at the Delta line. “I don’t want to know the location, I just want the ticket. I don’t want to know the location for reasons I may not say.”
Today, airline security is critical in order to insure the safety of passengers and pilots aboard a plane. However, that was not always the case. In the Golden Age of flying, there was simply no security whatsoever. It was common to get to the airport ten or twenty minutes earlier before a flight and they would still make it aboard, whereas today, getting there an hour or two before a flight is suggested, due to the security procedures. This vulnerability slowly increased the likelihood of heinous acts and terrorism, such as the 1970s hijackings, 9/11, and the Christmas Day bomber. Now people are more cautious and some believe the new technology, used for security, is invasive and unnecessary. Airport security, however, is only there to protect,
September 11, 2001 opened the eyes to people showing the treat of terrorism, and the important role airport security plays in the safety of people’s lives. Airport security developed as a result. However, recent tries of terrorist attacks showed use that good is not good enough, and more should be done to better the security system. As technology progresses worldwide, so should the technology and procedures in airports. It should always change so that we are a step ahead of terrorist. Although airport security is an inconvenience, its importance surpasses all of our grumble.
The Singapore Airlines needs to keep its superiority and stay on top of the competition in the international market, despite the bad times associated with a global economy or strategies implemented by main competitors.