Chinua Achebe's Heart of Darkness and Racism

2066 Words5 Pages

Chinua Achebe's Heart of Darkness and Racism

The Nigerian novelist Chinua Achebe made claims in the 1970s that

'Heart of Darkness' was a racist novella. My initial thoughts on this

are yet to be decided during the course of this essay. While my

thoughts are yet to have any significance, I do believe that Chinua

Achebe's remarks hold some truth.

Achebe's theory assumes that Marlow and Conrad are the same voice.

This could be a reasonable assumption as research into Conrad's life

has given us knowledge of Conrad's early years. In the 'heart of

darkness' the main character, Marlow has since childhood, had a desire

to "go there" (Africa), whilst exploring maps of the world. Conrad, in

the 'Introduction' of the book, also explored maps and, like Marlow,

travelled up the river Congo. Therefore one could assume that 'Heart

of Darkness' is a brief account of one man's life experience in a land

so misunderstood, judged and rejected.

The narrator of the novella is at the beginning, and during

intermissions of Marlow's dialogue, an anonymous hired hand that

introduces Marlow. The not-so-obvious presence of this character will

in no doubt make Chinua Achebe's claims groundless and in a sense a

lie. Conrad has distanced himself from this novella by creating not

one but two narrators in the same materiel. Therefore the audience

will not only hear Marlow's accounts and opinions but also that of

this unnamed hired hand.

The story revolves around two great rivers. The rivers in question are

the Thames and the Congo. Which when being depicted give Achebe's

claims some ground of truth.

"The tidal current runs to and fro in its unceasing ...

... middle of paper ...

... of the bullied so also the whole act of colonising

depends on the weakness or strength of the targeted nation. I believe

'Heart of Darkness' is not a novella justifying the acts of the white

man but shaming and condemning the under cover motives they used in

seeking their desires.

Ultimately the most fascinating figure in the novella is the enigmatic

Kurtz. It is very had to conclude indefinitely what Marlow thought of

Kurtz. Having undergone such a remarkable period of time with Kurtz,

Marlow himself appears to be recuperating from the haunting experience

at being in a critical point of the life of such a man as Mr Kurtz. No

doubt the episode is engraved in his mind but it will bring about

positive and negative opinions of the man as Kurtz presence was

establish to the audience during the last few days of his life.

Open Document