Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of having integrity military
Why is integrity important in the military
Integrity in the military
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of having integrity military
I. Introduction of Topic
The United States Navy is full of rich history, traditions and excellent sailors. To be successful, sailors must overcome challenges and obstacles throughout their career. Though some challenges are easier to overcome than others, one obstacle that seems prevalent among junior officers is cheating. In the last five years, cases of cheating have been reported in greater frequency ever before in the Navy. Though all enlisted and commissioned sailors face this ethical dilemma, it is important to understand how junior officers must face this challenge head on. They must make it their duty to stop cheating, because if it is not, it will continually get worse.
The word cheat is defined as “to break a rule or law usually to gain an advantage at something; to violate rules dishonestly; a dishonest person; to practice fraud or trickery; to be sexually unfaithful” (Cheat, Merriam-Webster). Based on this definition, the following actions are considered cheating: copying information from others to get ahead, falsifying logs and/or records, lying, distributing answers to a test, adultery, stealing, and any acts which consciously deceive. When a sailor is involved in any of these examples, their character, integrity, and ethics are brought into question. It is never morally right for citizens, much less a member of the Navy, to cheat or condone cheating in the United States Navy.
Junior officers rank from Ensign to Lieutenant Commander, O-1 to O-4. Within the first 10 years of their career, junior officers will make thousands of decisions. Because of this, an important part of their duty is to understand that all of their decisions must be made with the highest level of integrity and ethics. Though some situ...
... middle of paper ...
...vestigation. Complete details have not yet been made public.
References
Merriam-Webster. "Cheat." Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 06 Feb. 2014.
Cloud, David. “Navy Investigating a Cheating Scandal of its Own.” Navy Times. N.p., 04 Feb. 2014. Web. 17 Feb. 2014.
Fellman, Sam. "Navy Fires Hospital Ship's Top Officer, Says He Lied on PFA." Navy Times. N.p., 12 Sept. 2013. Web. 04 Feb. 2014.
Greenert, Admiral Jonathan and Richardson, Admiral John. “Press Briefing Transcript about Navy Investigation into Cheating Allegations at Nuke Reactor School.” United States Navy. The Pentagon, Washington D.C. 04 Feb. 2014. Press Conference.
Faram, Mark. “Squadron Commander Fired After Records Probe.” Navy Times. N.p., 17 Apr. 2012. Web. 04 Feb. 2014.
Myers, Meghann. “Report: Pilot Error, Training Deficiency Caused Jet Crash.” Navy Times. N.p., 14 Mar. 2014. Web. 07 Mar. 2014.
Abrashoff begins the book by informing the reader of how his story begins; when he is given command of the USS Benfold. The Benfold was the Navy’s most advanced guided missile destroyer the Navy had in 1997 and its command was to be one of the Navy’s top innovators. Unfortunately, Abrashoff points out some flaws with the Navy’s personnel management that I found to be shocking. First, was that “nearly 35 percent of the people who joined the military annually, wouldn’t complete their enlistment contracts.” (p.2) Such turnover can be understood by many business managers in the service industry, but unlike the quick and cheap training process for them, the cost for the military (taxpayers) is astounding. Abrashoff estimates that it cost roughly “$35,000 to recruit a trainee and tens of thousands more in additional training costs to get new personnel to the basic level of proficiency.” (p.2) Curbing this trend on his own ship and eventually helping to achieve a decrease overall in the mil...
LM01, Ethical Leadership. (2012). Maxwell Gunter AFB. Thomas N. Barnes Center for Enlisted Education (AETC)
On the morning of 3 July 1988, shortly after sunrise, the USS Vincennes moved itself north to investigate "sounds of explosions" as reported by the USS Elmer Montgomery. However, this command decision by CAP...
As a Non-commissioned Officer you can expect me to be a professional leader dedicated to taking care of soldiers, the mission, and the army way of life. You can expect me to use Army Regulations, Technical Manuals, and direct orders from my superiors as my guidance on what actions to take in each situation faced whether tactical or technical. I will not be afraid to make sound and timely decisions in the absence of my leadership’s orders. When left in charge I will take charge.
chain of command. Boba and Crank (2008) also hold that even the most skilled officer
... (2013, September 20). LawOfficer. Retrieved from Navy Police Union: Staff Cuts May Have Increased Death Toll at Navy Yard Shooting: http://www.lawofficer.com/article/news/navy-police-union-staff-cuts-m
As a member of the mightiest military force on the planet we are expected to always do what is right, but, as Non-Commissioned Officers we have the momentous obligation, duty and responsibility of serving as an example to our Soldiers at all times. In my experience and as the main argument for this paper, the actions of a poor leader can be devastating, demoralizing and toxic for junior troops and to the Army as a whole. As is the case of a negative experience I endured with SSG Perez, my then Platoon Sergeant, during a Field Training Exercise (FTX) in December 2012. I was a newly promoted E-4 and found myself entrenched in a fighting position with SSG Perez; a seasoned Soldier with combat experience in both Iraq
Senior Master Sergeant Tolbert has been serving 22 years in the Air Force and he has been in charge of Command and Support Staff for 4 years. He reports directly to the squadron commander. He manages 25 personnel to include five civilians. He had two different cases when his ethics got questions and he did not surrender his judgement. The first controversy
As part of US navy honor code, commissioned officers and enlisted swear an oath to abide themselves to: Honor, Courage, and Commitment. In situations of high risk and stress towards a decision, certain poor leaders will fade away their core values and rely on one’s own conscience. These types of actions/decisions can lead to avoidable instances and end lives. A great leader should be able to maintain confident courage during extreme adversity, and commit to being an upstander; will uphold fact, transparency, and truth in all his actions.
Honor in its most basic form is high respect or esteem. In the realm of the United States Navy, it is attached to bearing true faith and allegiance to our nation and conducting oneself in the highest ethical manner possible at all times with peers, seniors and juniors, even in public and private relations with those inside or outside the Navy and Armed Forces. It is synonymous with honesty, keeping one’s word, taking responsibility for one’s actions and being mindful and appreciative of the privilege to serve the country and our fellow Americans. This Core Value is important in its own right because it is a value that should not only be evident in military members, but also in the human population in general. That also goes for each of the other aforementioned values as well. One of the reasons why
There is an epidemic of cheating in American universities. Students are finding easier and more efficient ways to cheat. Morals and morality are changing. Students, members of the younger generation, and teachers, members of the older generation, differ on what is cheating. Morality even differs amongst students. Some students still adhere to the traditional sense of morality, and find what other students do an abhorration of morality. This essay is a mostly a pathos and ethos argument that attempts to appeal to the reader’s sense of right and wrong by using so-called “authorities.”
There are many meanings of the word cheat the meaning that sticks out the most to me is, to be unfaithful to somebody, to have a sexual relationship with somebody other than a spouse or regular sexual partner says MS Encarta. Relationships end everyday due to cheating and the emotional scares of cheating or being cheated on can stay with a person forever. Not only does cheating effect the person that has been cheated on, but it also affects the cheater, friends, and family members as well.
Cheating at a workplace is ubiquitous and has become almost a second nature of those practicing it. According to many righteous employees, the path of honest conduct is unappreciated, unnoticed and thorny. Employees mostly pave their way through the ladder of success by opting for faint ways of cheating.
Are there long-term consequences when it comes to cheating? Being academically dishonest shows lack of integrity, which can have lasting effects on educational environments, students’ relationship, and damage reputations. Cheating is not something forced, it is a choice.
John Paul Jones once said, “It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win”. Senior Enlisted Leaders are entrusted to pass down Naval heritage and tradition in order to develop the future of the Navy, while leaning on heroic examples from the past. This paper will examine John Paul Jones’s life before the Navy, his Naval career, and the legacy he left behind as well as its impact on the United States Navy.