Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Who moved my cheese characters summary
Effectiveness of organizational resilience
Effectiveness of organizational resilience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Who moved my cheese characters summary
1. Explain the personalities of Hem, Haw, Sniff and Scurry? Explain why they behave the way they do. The video, “Who moved my cheese?” encompasses four characters entering the maze in search of cheese. Sniff and Scurry are both proactive as they measure the condition of the cheese and keep their running shoes around their necks instead of throwing them aside after they have found the first cheese station. This proves that they have expected some changes in the future, and they are prepared to face all kinds of situations. The mice intend to commit more time to running and searching for new cheese rather than planning, thinking and analyzing the situation before initiating the search. However, their spontaneity saves them time and leads them to the destination faster (Hubpages, 2014). The mice are adaptable to the changes in cheese levels in the first station because they have no emotional influence on their decision making process. Their protocols for navigating through the maze are simply by trial and error where Sniff points in the general direction of the cheese and Scurry runs ahead to locate the cheese. Such behaviour also applies to the adaptation process. To summarize, Sniff and Scurry are the type of individuals who take immediate action before thinking through how change should be implemented. The other two characters are the little humans: Hem and Haw. Hem manipulates the situation to be controllable and systematic leading to rigidity and greater resistance to change (Sisney, 2013). Having a fixed mindset does not allow him to be influenced by any external factor. Creating such a system however leads to inflexibility, rigidity and a pessimistic nature as he prefers to remain stationary rather than looking for a new s... ... middle of paper ... ...Change to an Organization. Small Business. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/negative-effects-resistance-change-organization-24340.html Change Management Consultant. (n.d.). Kurt Lewin’s 3 phase change theory. Retrieved from http://www.change-management-consultant.com/kurt-lewin.html Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. In Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Field Theory in Social Science. London: Social Science Paperbacks. Sisney, L. ( 2013). Who Move My Cheese and the Four Forces. Organizational Physics. Retrieved from http://organizationalphysics.com/2013/04/01/who-moved-my-cheese-and-the-four-forces/ “Who moved my cheese?” (2014). Hubpages. Retrieved from http://informationshelte.hubpages.com/hub/Book-review-Who-moved-my-cheese Williams, C., & McWillams, A. (2010). Innovation and change. In MGMT(1st ed.). South Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.
My second character is Laurence Teft, a shy, scrawny defiant fourteen-year-old boy. Teft is overwhelmed by his parents high standards for him that he seems to almost always fail to meet. He feels as though he is always disappointing his parents and becomes very angry, then he expresses his frustration violently. He is starved for attention, even if it is negative attention, and breaks the rules to get it, his criminal behavior ends up helping the bedwetters in their scheme.
Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2008). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 86(7/8), 130-139.
A great example is how some dogs learn how to open a gate. They do not go through an extensive thought process to figure out how to open the gate. All the dog does is make multiple attempts at opening it until it succeeds. In Hare’s research, he mentions that the dog does not know about the connectivity between the gate and the fence and therefore he does not understand that he has “to break the connection” by moving the latch (168). However, there are different ways in which the dog could have found out how to open the gate, and that is if he had seen someone else open it before he attempted to do
The influence that the behaviors of groups have is one of the most important factors that help shape and contribute to a functional society. With their works, William Edward Burghardt
He took an environmental approach to the study. His method was the use of the operant conditioning box also known as Skinner box helped understand different behaviors that occurred during different environments. He stimulated a system of rewards and punishments and reinforcements. When the pigeon or rat received a reward, the animal performed the behavior more often and when it received a punishment, it performed the behavior less. He first tested positive reinforcement which he made rats press a lever for food. It encouraged the rat to perform more of the behavior. He also used negative reinforcement which added an uncomfortable stimulus. He placed an electric current in the box. The rats learn to avoid it. They even learned to stop when he turned on the light indicating the circuit will soon turn on. This behavior was known as Avoidance or Escape Learning. Both positive and negative reinforcements encourage good behavior. He also used punishment. Unlike the reinforcements, punishments were used to discourage unwanted behaviors rather than promote good behavior. It was performed by adding an unfavorable stimuli or removing the rewarding stimuli. When the rat was punished, its unwanted behavior decreased. When Skinner, removed the punishment, the bad behavior returned. He placed a hungry rat. The rat would pull the lever for food, but no food would come out. The rat later stopped pulling it learning it had no purpose. He studied that the more the rat pulled the lever, the higher the probability that the rat will quit pulling it; he developed an equation known as response and extinction rate. Response rate, the domain, is that rate of how hard a person performed an action and extinction rate, the range, is the rate that the person performed the action less and less. As the response rate increase, so this extinction rate. He used a token economy, a type of positive reinforcement, which a person was given a “token” which can be
At Harvard, B.F. Skinner looked for a more objective and restrained way to study behavior. Most of his theories were based on self-observation, which influenced him to become a enthusiast for behaviorism. Much of his “self-observed” theories stemmed from Thorndike’s Puzzle Box, a direct antecedent to Skinner’s Box. He developed an “operant conditioning apparatus” to do this, which is also known as the Skinner box. The Skinner box also had a device that recorded each response provided by the animal as well as the unique schedule of reinforcement that the animal was assigned. The design of Skinner boxes can vary ...
Sociological studies of IN Group/ Out Group and social cohesion do translate well for the theory
The size of a group is considered to be a restrictive condition on the quantity and quality of connection that can transpire amongst particular members. Kephart (1950) established that as group size increases the number of relationships that exist among member’s increases greatly. He suggests that as a result of this increase in relationships among members there will be an increased tendency towards divisions into subgroups in which participants relate to one another.
Skinner designed an experiment to test operant conditioning, known as a ‘Skinner box’ (Gross 2005). In the box, animals, such as rats, would be conditioned into certain behaviour. For example, by pressing a lever to receive food (Gross 2005).
A biologist, known as Piaget was interested in how an organism adapted to their environment, especially behavior adaptation to the environment. Piaget hypothesized that infants are born with schemes operating at birth that he called "reflexes." However, in human beings an infant uses these reflexes to adapt to the environment, these reflexes are quickly replaced with constructed schemes. Piaget described two processes used by the individual in its at...
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
In the video we see Thorndike using a hungry cat and putting that cat in a box in which food is in clear site outside the box, all the cat has to do is to find its way out by pulling or stepping on the treadle or pulling on a wire. When Thorndike first placed the cat in the box he was unable to see any flashes of insight and the successful actions appeared by chance and once the cat realized how to escape they were able to do it quicker and quicker. He doesn’t believe that the animals understand the consequence of their behavior until it happens and this is where trial and error comes from. Animals don’t just come in and see the puzzle and are able to solve it instead they try multiple things might fail or commit error a couple of times and learning from those errors they are able to learn and succeed. A real life example of this is for example a little kid being curious of touching the stove. The little kid doesn’t know the consequence of his or her actions. So when the child touches the hot stove and realizes it was a mistake to do it because it caused pain then the child might not repeat the
The aim of the box was to teach the rat in the box to press the lever by giving him food when he did. After spending some time inside the box, the rat realized that pressing the lever would bring him food, the reinforcement Skinner used. This experiment revealed another type of learning called operant conditioning, in which behavior is acquired because of the desired (or despised) consequences of the action. Operant conditioning is another confirmation that our brain determines our actions rather than our conscious control because the learning happens only because the results are somewhat pushing one to do the
These studies show that memory transience directly corresponds to an organism’s fitness and ability to process, analyze and solve new problems it is confronted with; and that it is responsible for increasing an organism’s behavioral flexibility and allows for an organism to make educated predictions based not only on past events but also on present information. Transience gives valuable insight into the mechanism of memory in the brain, proving that memory is not as static as some might assume nor is it as simple as the model of memory used in computers; rather it is a dynamic pool of information that is constantly updating and modifying itself to better understand the world around it. It allows the brain to grow and learn unimpeded acting as a silent regulator by removing detrimental information and replacing it with useful information; and while it is incredibly important to understand what transience is, the mechanisms behind it and what its purpose is, it is only one of many mechanisms involved in memory and even by fully understanding transience we have barely scratched the surface of what is truly going on in the
Group dynamics can be defined as the interactions that influence the behavior and attitudes of individuals when they are in groups. This is very important in the areas of sociology, psychology, and communication studies.