Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Coping with change: change management models and philosophies
The theory and practice of change management
The theory and practice of change management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Change Management The purpose of this paper is to discuss organizational change and the management of that change. I will talk about the different drivers of change, the factors a leader needs to weigh to implement change effectively, the various resistances a leader may encounter while trying to implement change, and how various leadership styles will effect the realization of change. I will also discuss the knowledge I have gained through the completion of this assignment and how I think it might affect the way I manage change in my workplace. Drivers for change come in two categories, internal and external. In the simulation, "Organization Structure", the pretence was that the stagnating system integration market, lead the CEO to get the engineers trained in networking techniques. This training, once put to use resulted in a 20% increase in total revenue for the company. This is an example of an external force for change. The company was faltering behind the staggering systems integration market, so change was imperative if the company was to maintain its profitability. Another example of an external force for change demonstrated by the simulation was when a key technology advisor broke ties with the company. This forced change in the way the company was going about the initial change. In other words it changed the way the company was changing. What needed to happen was this; advisors needed to be replaced, alternative solutions needed to be developed, lost time needed to be made up, and projects needed to be coordinated. Because a key advisor quit many changes needed to be implemented, but for the initial plan for change to be a success, leadership needed to adapt to the adversity. An internal driver of change is a... ... middle of paper ... ... MacLean, D. (1999) 'Conditioned emergence: a dissipative structures approach to transformation'. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (4), 297-316. Macintosh, R. and MacLean, D. (2001) 'Conditioned emergence: researching change and changing research'. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(10), 1343-1357. Quinn, J.B. (1980) Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism, lrwin, Homewood, IL. Stacey, R.D. (2003) Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity, FT/Prentice-Hall, Harlow. Stickland, F. (1998) The Dynamics of Change: Insights into Organisational Transition from the Natural World, Routledge, London. Weymes, E. (2003, May ). Relationships not leadership sustain successful organisations. Journal of Change Management, 3. Retrieved Nov 9, 2005, from EBSCOHOST
The change process started producing results until the “Dot Com Bust” hit the industry like a “tsunami”. Like all other major players in the Industry Marconi plc faced a dramatic down turn and within a matter of few months the company was hit with a crisis for survival from the peaks that it scaled as a result of the change process introduced by Lord Simpson.
Hughes, M 2006, 'Strategic change', in M Hughes (ed.), Change management: a critical perspective, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London, pp. 52-63.
Apart from reading chapter 6, I did some research from other resources to find out more about change management, Change is constant in today’s business world as Charles Darwin quotes, “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, neither the most intelligent, but rather the one most responsive to change”. Changes are often brought about by the top level management (i.e. leaders, managers, shareholders). Managing change or undergoing change situation is often a very difficult phase for most of the pe...
The term leadership and change management are interrelated between each other. Leadership direct the company to reach in the destination. Eventually, it is concentrate to formulating the business strategies require to transfer in new state to achieve the corporate goal (Hayes, 2010, p.159). Kotter (2011) explains that leadership is act as an engine on entire change process, that drives, controls and manages to move quickly in efficient way. According to Northouse (2013), “Leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal.”
Aside from permitting my authoritarian characteristics to shine, being a CEO during the Change Management simulation allowed me to better understand how an executive may leverage their influence and position to enact change, especially when there is external pressure to do so. By gaining interest, encouraging adoption, and confronting resistance when necessary, the company successfully achieved adoption of the sustainability plan.
Change is actually one of the things in life that can never be avoided, no matter how hard we try; it is the one constant in life. When it comes to organizations however, change can often be difficult, if not impossible, depending on a number of factors including employee receptiveness. There have been many studies completed on the cause of resistance to change. In Coch and French’s research study (1948) they asked two important questions surrounding resistance, “(1) Why do people resist change so strongly? and (2) What can be done to overcome this resistance?” Most change program experts will certainly name resistance to change as one of the largest obstructions to successfully executing change programs.
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
Change is inevitable and bound to happen in all aspects of life including business. Although change is important in an organization, it can also be seen as a strength and weakness. Effective leadership is about mastering change. One must be willing to change in order to grow and be successful. This paper will compare and contrast Kotter and Kurt Lewin step in their change management models. Furthermore, it will elaborate on the concepts and explain whether these methods can be used at the same time. In addition, this paper will include a Christian worldview of the information discussed and how it relates to the change management models.
The experienced change was as a reaction to the external environment and influenced organizational strategy, the company’s leadership, and culture. This large-scale change led to a new state of being (thinking and acting).
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
The changing effect, according to Middaugh and Grissom (2012) is knowing that it is going to disrupt the current culture of the organization. This is because the change must be delivered to show that it is better than what is currently being used. The leadership has to show the employees that the change is to better the processes of the organization. The employees have to be taken out of the comfort zone for the change to be successful and the organization has to deliver the new processes in a way that it will benefit everyone. The model breaks it down from the old process, new process, and assisting employees to
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
Why do organizations change? With time goes by, rapid development of science and technology had led us to a world full of competitions. Change and stay alert to keep up with the current trend is essential asset to survive in this aggressive global economy. As the framework indicated by Pettigrew, there are two key context factors makes a great deal of effects on the reason for companies to change. Those are outer context and Inner context. Outer context could refer to the surrounding environment around the firm and the global economics status, etc. Inner context could be downsizing, restructuring the Gestalt, or the problem with coherent design archetype. Under the stress of the outer and inner context, forces or triggers will bring out the revolution. Change can be seen in a short term way and also in a long term way. Short term change could be a sudden, discontinuous and frame-breaking rupture which has an impact on the whole organisation, or new forms of management ad structure of the firm itself, or the breakthrough created by the major innovations or even can refers to the impact of new product and new market opportunities. Normally, financial crisis will be an initiative as a trigger to revolution. At first of the revolution, there would probably already has small changes in normal management and structure. As a long term way to apply the change, change agents are needed to do an ongoing, continuous and gradual progression or give some simpler initiatives such as improvements to existing products and product range.
Force of change is a positive factor that an organization must put in place in order to drive and develop the entire organization’s environment. In this process of change more of resistance factors will try to hinder the change. The organization in this case experiences a repulsive force which absolutely adheres to reserve the existing ways of handling of issues. In the process the firm faces the competitive challenges from other organization and in meanwhile diseconomies of scale. Organizational change process is the progression of a given institution, far from its present state and towards some desired prospects to propagate its performance effectiveness. The organization’s work strategy persistently changes for better. Afterwards, the members’ organization must acclimatize to organization’s forces of change in a bid to conserve its relevancy and effectiveness. Lewin’s force field theory of change serves as a convenient model in understanding the change process. The role of the organization leader is both intense and diverse. For the organization to propel in its management processes, the organization leader must adhere to his increasing responsibilities of change. The leader must be the primary catalyst to speed up the mechanism used to assure the members of positivity effect of change and the expected period of its existence.
Different organizations typically face change due to many forces surrounding their mission. These forces can be from either internal or external sources. The External forces usually occur outside of the organization and it could have a global effect. According to Kreitner-Kinichi (2003) the four external forces for change are demographic characteristics, technological advancements, market changes, and social and political pressures. The internal forces for change come from inside the organization like human problems, managerial behaviors and decisions.