Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impacts of the 9/11 terrorists attacks
The Impact of terrorism in North America after September 2001
Impacts of the 9/11 terrorists attacks
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impacts of the 9/11 terrorists attacks
The Italian criminologist, jurist, and philosopher, Cesare Beccaria, if alive to witness the framework under which the United States’ counter terrorism measures operated, would be nothing short of appalled. On Crimes and Punishment, Beccaria’s most well-known work, argues against the use of torture, secret accusations, the arbitrary discretionary power of judges, the inconsistency and inequality of sentencing, the use of personal connections to gain more relaxed sentences, and the use of capital punishment for serious and even minor offenses. These practices remain alive today. The events of September 11th, 2001 brought the United States and the Western world into direct confrontation with radical extremism, and the confrontation dramatically altered the way in which the U.S. opposes those suspected of being terrorists. This …show more content…
The success, or lack thereof, of the anti- terrorism measures which the United States adopted deserve attention. Over $1.6 trillion dollars and six thousand American lives later, the ‘War on Terror’ is a war with no foreseeable conclusion in sight. It is also a war in which the conduct of the United States Military has departed from conventional- if not morally acceptable- practices. There is a corollary between the acceptance of torture which occurred almost immediately after 9/11 and through the Bush years and the proliferation of drone strikes that has occurred under President Obama. This essay will argue that the United States government’s decision to employ ‘enhanced interrogation’ methods on suspected terrorists, as well as its active use of drone strikes against similar suspects is not only without legal merit, but serves to propagate terrorism and undermine national and global security in the long
Cole, D., & Dempsey, J. X. (2006). Terrorism and the constitution: sacrificing civil liberties in the name of national security. New York: New Press.
This historical study will compare and contrast the depiction of the “War on Terror” in a pro-government and anti-government plot structures found in Zero Dark Thirty (2012) by Kathryn Bigelow and The Siege (1998) by Edward Zwick. The pro-government view of Zero Dark Thirty defines the use of CIA agents and military operatives to track down Osama Bin Laden in the 2000s. Bigelow appears to validate the use of torture and interrogation as a means in which to extract information in the hunt for Bin Laden. In contrast this depiction of terrorism, Zwick’s film The Siege exposes the damage that torture, kidnapping, and
Host: On September the 11th 2001, the notorious terror organisation known as Al-Qaeda struck at the very heart of the United States. The death count was approximately 3,000; a nation was left in panic. To this day, counterterrorism experts and historians alike regard the event surrounding 9/11 as a turning point in US foreign relations. Outraged and fearful of radical terrorism from the middle-east, President Bush declared that in 2001 that it was a matter of freedoms; that “our very freedom has come under attack”. In his eyes, America was simply targeted because of its democratic and western values (CNN News, 2001). In the 14 years following this pivotal declaration, an aggressive, pre-emptive approach to terrorism replaced the traditional
Most Americans believe that the troop presence in Iraq and Afghanistan is due to the terrorist attacks on the United States. And while it is hard to deny that the 9-11 attacks were the impetus for putting boots on the ground, it is imperative that the chain of events following the horror of September 11 are seen to reflect the willingness and wants of actors in control before the towers fell. In no field other than politics does the justification for action often come from a noteworthy event and the true cause stays hidden behind the headlines.... ... middle of paper ... ...
America’s Use of Torture in Interrogations of Suspected Terrorists Violates Human Rights by Lisa Hajjar
Welch, Michael. “Trampling Human Rights in the War on Terror: Implications to the Sociology of Denial.” Critical Criminology (2004).
While international documents have restricted and in some cases even banned the death penalty, its application is still not against customary international law. Much debate continues in the US as to whether it constitutes an appropriate punishment, at least to the most heinous crimes. In recent years, the debate has been further fuelled by the use of new technologies, which have shown that a large proportion of people sentenced to death are, indeed, innocent. The death penalty is no more effective a deterrent than life imprisonment... It is also evident that the burden of capital punishment falls upon the poor, the ignorant and the underprivileged members of society."
In the book On Crimes and Punishments; the author; Cesare Beccaria talks about the justice system and the changes that he believes will make society better for all the citizens. In many of Cesare Beccaria’s statements he argues that to lower crimes, all citizens should be treated equally to have society properly function. Despite the changes that Cesare Beccaria made on equality, there is still a lot of hard work to be done to attain equality worldwide even to this day. Beccaria believes that certain aspects of the law have to change so that everyone could be treated the same even if they are of a different class divisions as well as if they have been accused of a given crime.
Kretzmer, D. (2005). Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defense. Targeted Killing as Active Self-Defense : Noah Feldman.
As an Italian lawyer and legal philosopher, he saw the then-actual criminal law as a messy jumble of laws, customs, and traditions that were being derived from ancient Roman and German cultures. This traditional law included criminal justice practices such as the use of torture to secure a confession and capital punishment. Beccaria not only believed that these methods were erratic, but ineffective. He also believed that these practices did not serve the public to its greatest potential of justice. Beccaria’s desired goal was to rationalize this jumble of laws into a uniform system that demonstrated the spirit of innovation and consistency, with principle and predictability. He would then publish the influential treatise, On Crime and Punishment, in 1764. He believed that those who abused the judicial system of its powers, did not serve the greatest good of the public. Arguments such as, justice being executed among the public, judicial torture being eradicated and deemed as inhumane, and how the accused should have a presumption of innocence until proven guilty; would be of the included within the
Rothe, D. & Muzzatti, S.L. 2004. Enemies everywhere: Terrorism, moral panic and US civil society. Critical Criminology. 1(12): 327–350.
The Death Penalty Laws date as far back as the fourteenth century. The initial purpose of the death penalty was to cause death to those who committed all crimes and was punishable by crucifixion, drowning, beaten to death, burned alive, and impalement. America’s use of the death penalty was influence by Britain. When European settlers came to the new world, they brought the practice of capital punishment. During the Colonial Times, it was Cesare Beccaria’s 1767 essay, On Crimes and Punishment, which had an especially strong impact throughout the world.
On September 11, 2001, the destruction of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon changed the mindset and the opinion of nearly every American on the one of the most vital issues in the 21st century: terrorism (Hoffman 2). Before one can begin to analyze how the United States should combat such a perverse method of political change, one must first begin to understand what terrorism is, where it is derived from, and why there is terrorism. These issues are essential in America’s analysis of this phenomenon that has revolutionized its foreign policy and changed America’s stance in the world.
Terrorism has many forms, and many definitions. “Elements from the American definitional model define terrorism as a premeditated and unlawful act in which groups or agents of some principal engage in a threatened or actual use o...