Capstone Assignment

1599 Words4 Pages

As a student at Temple University, one is required to TAKE classes apart of the Intellectual Heritage Program in order to receive an undergraduate degree. The argument persists as to whether or not the Intellectual Heritage Program is a necessary part of a student’s general undergraduate education. Through my experience in taking both IH 851 and IH 852 programs, I found that the Intellectual Heritage Program administered a number of benefits, as well as flaws concerning the education that I gained from it, how the material was taught, and the texts I was required to analyze.
Personally, I believe that the Intellectual Heritage Program provides minimal importance strictly concerning an undergraduate education. In other words, I gained very little knowledge that relates to my major field of study from the materials we analyzed in both IH 851 and IH 852. Instead, I walked away from the program with a heightened knowledge of history in the early societies around the world and the nature of human beings. The Intellectual Heritage Program provides a broader range of education than I feel is necessary to be required by all undergraduate majors. Though I value any education, I feel that students would benefit more from an academic program if the information they learned was more useful in their major field of study. For instance, texts like “The Epic of Gilgamesh” may be more beneficial to a history major than a pre-med major. On the other hand, I understand that it would be impossible to integrate texts that relate to every major offered here at Temple University. Thus, instead of forcing all students to take a class such as Intellectual Heritage, allowing them to substitute it with a class more focused on their field of study would be...

... middle of paper ...

... society. It may sound a little far-fetched, but the fact of the matter is, analyzing texts that pose no interest to most students cannot provide for a better undergraduate education as can analyzing texts that will strike interest in them.
Conclusively, I believe with a little bit of rehab and straightening up, the Intellectual Heritage Program is an important program to maintain as part of a student’s undergraduate education. To me, the education captured by analyzing the material itself is less important than the skills that I received from this academic program. If the curriculum were to be revised in order to include more interactive was to present the material, along with texts that offer more relevance to students, I think the Intellectual Heritage Program would strive as a very important program in helping shape the education of Temple University students.

Open Document