Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of media in education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
If I am to read Dr.Seuss over the dictionary does that make me worthless? In highschool I often could never relate to the stories I was made to read. I would always find my mind wandering about different things or I would find myself not caring about the grades I made. I would often put my head in the book and drift off to sleep, that would result in trouble. Many times, when I got in trouble and had to go to the office I did not care because I was not being bored by the readings that were being forced on me. Although teachers feel differently about what is intellectual, but students should not feel bad for not being able to relate.
In the essay “Hidden Intellectualism” Gerald Graff expressed his views on education. He feels that teachers or professors only see traditional subjects or text as intellectually valuable even though, although as a professor himself, he disagrees with it. He feels that the spectrum should be broadened to be able to interact with the kids more and get them more interested in the reading that are taught in schools. He is speaking to teachers in an effort to get them to change from the mindset of teaching traditionally and get reading that students to relate to. He is also speaking to students to get them to feel better about not being able to relate certain readings, and to also see that not being able to relate to the readings is not a bad thing. Although Pop Culture reading is not considered as intellectual reading it should be.
During Graff’s childhood, he was not able to relate to readings that he was given in school. Instead, Graff was interested in baseball. Being that Graff was interested in baseball, he would often find himself reading books and magazines about baseball and baseball pla...
... middle of paper ...
...fessors do not see Pop Culture readings as a form of intellectualism, or what is considered suitable reading for academics. Even though Graff is a professor, he can identify with students and how they feel about bow they can not relate to readings that are see as intellectual in an academic setting. If students are to never catch on to read the different reading that teachers think are suitable, will students give up or will they eventually stop caring.In an academic setting, will Pop Culture readings ever become considered as intellectual and will teachers ever allow students to pick out their own readings. If they don’t will the teachers ever see an interest in the students and their work.
Works Cited
Graff, G. "Hidden Intellectualism." Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture 1.1 (2001): 786-90. Print.
In the world we live in today is mostly criticizing not really your in different parts of something in school , but its mostly about you have to criticize someone over what they look like or how they dress or where they get there clothes from. All mostly what people think are "intellectual" are the smart ones , critics , and imaginative creators. I think Captain Beatty is trying to get Montag
All in all, “Hidden Intellectualism” is a pleasant journey through the nuances of educating future intellectuals, especially with Gerald Graff at the helm navigating as only a venerable ship captain can.
One thing people in the society seam to overlook or pay no attention to is anti-intellectualism. What is anti-intellectualism? and does it exist in the society today. Anti-intellectualism is the hostility or overlooking of intellectually skilled individuals in the society. According to Grant Penrod, anti-intellectualism doesn’t only exist in the society but also in the schools today, which he showed in his essay "Anti-intellectualism: Why We Hate Smart Kids". In his essay Penrod talked about smart student or people and how they are being overlooked or ostracized in the society. In this essay he made an argument that students or people who are intellectually
In my analysis I will focus on “Hidden Intellectualism” an excerpt from “They Say/I Say.” Gerald Graff argues that schools and colleges are missing opportunities with street smart students. He feels that “…the education life is too narrowly and exclusively with subjects and texts...” (Graff 1). Graff believes that through his own experiences as a kid, caring only for sports, Graff attempts to persuade fellow professors of his beliefs of missing opportunities in such students. He talks about the real world and how everything portrayed in the media, is not what schools and colleges are looking for. Graff argues that, “Only much later did it dawn on me that the sports world was more compelling than school because it was more intellectual than, school, not less” (Graff 3). Graff feels that his street smarts past has sculpted him has made him who he is now. He eventually argues about the Marilyn Monroe example, agreeing with the other side for a little bit, saying there isn’t much difference.
He discusses in his 2003 article “Hidden Intellectualism” what he believes are some of the issues with education today and the direction he thinks is most beneficial to take moving forward. He begins the article by acknowledging that everyone has come across someone in life who they were aware was “impressively street smart but had done poorly in school.” (264). He feels the schools are missing out on a major opportunity by not tapping into this intellectualism. This is something that Murray might disagree with on the surface based on his arguments backed by statistics from test scores and academic settings. Graff goes on to explain his experience as a “street smart” kid and what he feels are the many, and obvious, similarities in the intellectualism used in student interests, like sports for example, and the intellectualism used in an academic setting. The rest of the article explains how he feels education should adjust and incorporate more student interests to create an environment that lends itself to getting intellectual practices from as many students as possible. These are points made by Graff that Murray would be likely to disagree with. Similar to the points made by Murray that Graff would be likely to disagree
The article Fahrenheit 451 Revisited written by Paul Trout from the source Forum on Education and Academics talks about the importance of education, and how the novel Fahrenheit 451 provokes introspection and discussions which helps students learn more through a better education. It states in the beginning of the article, “The story focus on a fireman who burns book because the people want books burn. As, Beatty the fireman chief explains mass culture slowly discredited books, replacing their hard earned and sometimes disturbing messages with fun experiences such as interactive soap operas telecast on four walls. Because books disturb people by posing questions and contradicting each other, it is up to the Firemen to not let the torrent of melancholy and drear philosophy drown our world.” This quotation from the article helps prove the importance of books, and explains if books were not allowed then education would not be important in todays society. The author Paul Trout explains more in detail the benefit of reading Fahrenheit 451 because its a good example of explaining anti-intellectual aspects in education for students. This benefits my essay because it explains the meaning of the book, and shows the importance of it for students in todays society.
In this essay “Hidden Intellectualism” Gerald Graff, is one of the coauthors of this book and is a professor in English and education, at the University of Illinois in Chicago. Graff argues that many of his audience generally associate “book smarts” with intellectualism, and “street smarts” with anti-intellectualism. However, in this essay, it suggests that being street smart can be united with the academic community. It provides arguments and points that show how being involved in non-academic matters such as sports, fashion, and music can help an individual develop his or her academic way of thinking. When thinking in such a manor can develop arguments and counterarguments, analyzing situations, and applying one 's thoughts on the subject
In a society that likes to put people into categories based on certain defining characteristics, Leonid Fridman highlights how “nerds” and “geeks” receive unfair treatment for being smart. In his argument, Fridman goes to highlight how our culture, especially in the United States, looks down upon people who are “intellectually curious and academically serious.” Leonid Fridman is able to construct a compelling argument by illustrating how children are dissuaded from being smart and hardworking at an early age, depicting intellectuals as the damsel in distress, and by illuminating the ostracization of intellectuals in the U.S. specifically.
Harvey Graff’s contributions are like Guillory’s except that his focusses on an earlier time than Guillory. This again provides context for the idea Clunes is discussing. In addition, however, Graff’s contribution provides a name to the model faux interdisciplinarity. This allows the issues Clune addresses to be easily targeted under one name. Graff is also cited to provide further insight into this topic through his idea that understanding is often achieved through engaging in interdisciplinary instruction. Outside of this article, Graff has a book titled Undisciplining Knowledge, which shows that he has taken the time to think about and research this topic, verifying him as a
One of the hallmarks of reading is the transformation of one’s image among others from merely a simple person to shining example of wisdom and sophistication. Reading results in polished and well-versed individuals who subject themselves to higher standards of integrity and these attributes make society call them ‘scholars’. The presence of scholarly people in society is of paramount importance as seen by Bloom quoting Emerson, “…society cannot do without cultivated men and women…” (Bloom). The study and research done by sociologists suggests that humans have an intricate nature to submit to peer pressure as well as conform to societal norms rather than express themselves as the odd ones out. In that scenario, scholars are crucial assets who would steer the social and cultural norms towards reading and the desire to achieve more wisdom and knowledge because “A scholar is a candle which the love and desire of all men will light” (Bloom). Once the objectives of discovering the ‘self’ and doing ‘self-improvement’ have been conquered, the intellectuals demonstrate purity of heart and mind, empathy for those in suffering, a wary approach to the vagaries of the world
Should students’ required reading in high school represent the real or the idea? Students deserve to represent the real, not the ideal in which most parents want them to believe life is normal. Meghan Cox Gurdon believes that the novels with gruesome details and storylines should not be in the reach of students. Janice Harayda also agreed with Ms. Gurdon, but Sherman Alexie did not agree with either one of them.
In Dwight Macdonald’s article, “Reading and Thought”, he believes that in today's generation, people do not value the importance of printed materials because of a lack of time. Comparing the previous old generation to today's generation, the old generation had more time to imagine and go in depth in what they were reading. The way our society reads printed material like novels, articles, news, etc. is what Macdonald calls, “functional curiosity.” Stated in his article, Macdonald quotes a publisher from the Time, trivial rather than functional, who says that, “functional curiosity grows as the number of educated people grow” and explains that functional curiosity
Ralph Waldo Emerson’s assertion about the power of the book is true in regards that literature is the fundamental basis of education, however it is the most widely neglected resource in our society today.
Between the years of 1984 - 1999, Brian Cambourne had a wonderful opportunity to be a participate observer with a large range of school staffs (in the Western educational cultures,) who were engaged in the process of turning theory into classroom practices. The questions in which the staff/teachers were asked were the following: “what is good reading? “how is it best learned?” and “after it’s been learned, what should it be used for?” Cambourne’s overall goal was to collaborate everyone’s thoughts together and try to come to a conclusion about the level of debates that underrates the attempt to translate any theory into effective classroom practice and to come up with, “shared meanings.” This group of staff/teachers engaged in a range of
Intellectualism has become more accepted to the point where intellectuals are not mocked and are seen as cool. For example, Big Bang Theory is a popular television show about a group of intellectuals. In the show, the intellectuals are the main characters and not background characters who are teased or bullied. Also in the new Disney show “Girl Meets World,” there is a main character who is seen