Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing and contrasting 1984 and brave new world
Comparing and contrasting 1984 and brave new world
Reflection about novel 1984 by George Orwell
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing and contrasting 1984 and brave new world
In 1984 by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, both authors convey a warning to society about allowing governments to have too much power and control over their people. In 1984, the Party controls Oceania and practically brainwashes its people through means such as the telescreens. On the other hand, in Brave New World, the government controls its people through conditioning from birth and soma in order to make everyone oblivious to the government’s control. In both novels, the protagonists struggle against their governments, but Winston, from 1984, loses his individuality, whereas John, from Brave New World, manages to remain true to himself and not lose his individuality. In 1984, Oceania is controlled by the Party, which …show more content…
Winston’s first act of rebellion is when he writes in a journal, which is illegal because it involves thoughtcrime. Later in the novel, Winston has an affair with Julia as another act of rebellion because the Party only wants people to have relationships for reproduction. Winston’s most significant act of rebellion is when he believes he joins the Brotherhood: “... a vast shadowy army, an underground network of conspirators dedicated to the overthrow of the State”(Orwell 13). Because Winston joins the Brotherhood, he agrees to do whatever the Brotherhood ask of him, which includes giving up his life, committing murder, and much more. Since Winston joins the Brotherhood, it shows that he is fully devoted to rebelling against the Party. But, later in the novel, O’Brien betrays Winston because O’Brien pretends to be part of the Brotherhood, when O’Brien actually works for the Party. Winston gets tortured to his breaking point. While Winston is being tortured, he betrays Julia and loses all of his individuality. Winston fails because he gives in to the dominant Party, and he does not retain any of his individuality. For example, at the end of the novel, the narrator says, “[Winston] [loves] Big Brother” (Orwell 298). This shows that the Party has complete control over Winston and he is like all of the other people in Oceania. If a government acquires too much power and
1984 and Brave New World, written by George Orwell and Aldous Huxley, respectively, are both books that reflect the authors vision of how society would end up at the course it was going at the time of the writing of the book. Both books were written more than fifty years ago, but far enough apart that society was going in a totally different direction at the time. There are many ways to compare these two books and point out the similarities. On certain, deep levels they are very much the same, while at first glance, on the surface, they are very different. One point that in some parts is the same and some very different, is the governments in each of these books method’s of control.
The approach towards freedom is hard to achieve against a totalitarian government but possible to win with the people’s belief. 1984 by George Orwell and James McTeigue’s V for Vendetta portray the same idealism of the anti-heroes, Winston and V. An anti-hero is “a protagonist who lacks the attributes that make a heroic figure, as nobility of mind and spirit, a life or attitude marked by action or purpose” (“Antihero”). Winston is not courageous, peaceful, and self-centered along the path of freedom for Oceania, whereas the anti-hero, V is violent in his actions, impatient and careless in his pursuit to free London from the totalitarian government. As a matter of fact, V and Winston have the opposite behaviours; this is significant because it helps to compare the approach of the anti-heroes toward freedom. At the end of 1984 and V for Vendetta, the result of their approach is different from each other; Winston gives up on the liberation of Oceania, while V dies knowing that London is freed from Norsefire Party. In 1984 and V for Vendetta, the different behaviours of the anti-heroes, Winston and V, illustrate their approach to attaining freedom from the totalitarian government.
Comparing and Contrasting main elements in Brave New World and 1984 “Power is of two kinds”. One is obtained by the fear of punishment, and the other by acts of love. Power based on love is a thousand times more effective and permanent than the one derived from fear of punishment” -Mahatma Gandhi. In this quote, Gandhi discusses different elements of how power is maintained in a society. The novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley displays a futuristic society controlled through pleasure, while 1984 by George Orwell displays the other side of the spectrum where power is strictly enforced by fear.
This dream of forming and maintaining a utopian society was immortalized in two novels dealing with the same basic ideas, 1984 by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Both of these novels deal with the lives of main characters that inadvertently become subversives in a totalitarian government. These two books differ greatly however with the manner in which the government controls the population and the strictness of the measures taken to maintain this stability. This essay with compare and contrast the message and tone of each novel as well as consider whether the utopia is a positive or negative one.
This Perfect Day belongs to the genre of "dystopian" or anti-utopian novels, like Huxley's Brave New World and Orwell's 1984. Yet it is more satisfying than either. This Perfect Day is probably Ira Levin's greatest work of his career. Levin's work, despite being written in 1970, is very plausible having realistic technology, such as scanners and computers which watch over the entire family, the entire population of the world. This novel could be used to show the dangers of a Utopian society as well as being full of anti-Communist and anti-racist sentiment. This Perfect Day also displays the feeling that communist and segregated institutions can be defeated, as the protagonist Chip over powers the "family" and their vile Uni Comp as well as rising above the segregated community he reaches after fleeing the family. This work could best be placed in an area of the curriculum where it is the students job to learn that although everyone might not be equal, nor should they be, they are still human and deserve to be treated with the respect and kindness we would expect to be treated with. This work could be used in conjunction with other works of literature that display the same ideals against communism and discrimination as well as a lack of compassion for others. Other works that could be used in cohorts with Levin's This Perfect Day, are Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut and even the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood. Both of these novels show the dangers of trying to create a Utopian society and the chaos it causes. In Harrison Bergeron, handicapping has become an American institution and it is the governments responsibility to make sure that everyone is equal in every way which ends up causing chaos and rebellion. The Handmaid's Tale shows the dangers of when an extreme group takes over the United States after a nuclear holocaust, with women being placed in a submissive role to men, only being used to reproduce. This Perfect Day could also be used in a section with novels such as Uncle Tom's Cabin which portray the evils of racism and discrimination, just as the land where Chip ends up after escaping the family, is very racist and segregated. He is forced to endure the taunts and tortures of the folks who had fought Uni from the beginning, yet he rises above these bounds to return and destroy Uni Comp, thereby destroying the family.
In 1984 by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, they exhibit the necessity of individuality through Winston and John. While John almost achieved breaking away from conformity, Winston never did.
While Brave New World and 1984 are both dynamic dystopian satires written by men who were startled by the changing ways of the 20th century, they differ in their own attributes while maintaining the similar oppressive government both stories are based around.
destroys any variation of idea from the intention of the “Party’s';. Literature is also slowly altered so that the author’s original meaning is lost to the meaning of the Newspeak language. Newspeak translations seem to consume thoughts and memories much like a sponge absorbs water.
Aldous Huxley's Brave New World is more relevant today than George Orwell's 1984. Although both of the two totalitarian societies are based on plausible premises, the Utopia depicted in Brave New World still has a chance of appearing today, while the Big Brother-dominated society created by Orwell, being based to some extent on the totalitarian societies that existed at the time of the book's inception, is simply obsolete.
In the dystopian worlds from Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, and 1984, by George Orwell, both governments have supreme control over their citizens. The authors use hypnopedia, doublethink, and the restriction of language to portray that governments have the ability to control their citizens and strip them of their free will without their consent or realization. Both governments rely on the sacrifice of individuality and a state of mindlessness to reach an ultimate goal of stability and everlasting peace. They still have extreme regulations and punishments for those who do not conform, because it seems like the citizens have the ability to break out of the mold that was created for them. However, these additional techniques to make the
In George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984, the protagonist, Winston Smith, finds himself questioning the reality that The Party paints for the citizens of Oceania. In Oceania, the past is mutable, and Party’s power enables them to distort the present through “doublethink” and “newspeak” (Orwell 35). The world that Salvador Dali creates in his painting, The Persistence of Memory (1931), and its literal, visual distortion, greatly resembles the metaphorical warped nature of Oceania. Not only did George Orwell and Salvador Dali craft distorted versions of the world in their respective mediums, within 1984, the Party exercises the same kind of control an artist has over their work through “Reality control” (Orwell 35). Compelling parallels can be
A dystopian society can be defined as “a society characterized by human misery”. 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury both demonstrate dystopian societies. However, that does not mean they do not their differences. In each society the government has different ways of controlling and limiting its citizens for doing only what they want them to do. In 1984, violators are brainwashed into loving and following Big Brother as if they never knew the truth and return back to their everyday lives. Fahrenheit 451 also punishes violators in a way that makes them regret and scared to ever do it again instead of making them forget.
The books Brave New World, by Aldrous Huxley, and 1984, by George Orwell, are alike because they have comparable organizations. By using brainwashing techniques, censorship, and the obliteration of history, the leaders in Brave New World and 1984 control the thoughts and recollections of the people in their societies. Without using these techniques, the societies being controlled could not exist, because the people would not be disciplined like they needed to be. The citizens in these societies are slaves of the leaders, but cannot resist or do anything to change things for themselves.
He chooses to engage in rebellious activities, which lead to his demise. If Winston were to remain obedient to the Party’s rules, he would have most likely lived out the rest of his life. It is Winston’s choice to betray the Party by disobeying their rules, which he does by writing in his diary and engaging in sexual intercourse with Julia. Winston is also fully aware that what he is doing is wrong, yet “...what he wanted, more even than to be loved, was to break down that wall of virtue, even if it were only once in his whole life. The sexual act, successfully performed, was rebellion. Desire was thoughtcrime” (Orwell 71). Winston has the option to obey the Party, yet he makes the alternative decision to rebel. He makes these poor decisions at his own discretion, and they ultimately lead to his downfall. Violating the Party’s rules results in a possible punishment of death, which Winston is well aware of. Therefore, his poor choices lead to his murder. Winston had the option to obey the Party or disobey the Party and he chose to disobey them. As well, Winston is responsible for choosing to be converted by O’Brien, a member of the Party, into believing what the Party believes. Sure, Winston would be tortured if he chooses not to succumb to the Party’s beliefs, but yet he still has the freewill to choose to be tortured. No matter how painful the torture was, Winston still has
In 1984, written by George Orwell, and Brave New World, written by Aldous Huxley, relationships are centered around romance, which inflicts contrasting feelings, thoughts, and emotions amongst the characters. However; in both novels’, romantic relationships are set to achieve one goal: a centralization of power within a society. Both novels have a head of all this power within their society and each head has structured or has influenced their society to follow their rules on how to live life so that they can increase their own power. In 1984 and Brave New World, the representation of a romantic relationship, through varying techniques such as marriage, sex, and family relations, is used as a method to centralize power because of the lack of true passion and to keep stability and continuity within a society.