Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
1984 vs brave new world comparison
1984 vs brave new world comparison
1984 vs brave new world comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 1984 vs brave new world comparison
In 1984, written by George Orwell, and Brave New World, written by Aldous Huxley, relationships are centered around romance, which inflicts contrasting feelings, thoughts, and emotions amongst the characters. However; in both novels’, romantic relationships are set to achieve one goal: a centralization of power within a society. Both novels have a head of all this power within their society and each head has structured or has influenced their society to follow their rules on how to live life so that they can increase their own power. In 1984 and Brave New World, the representation of a romantic relationship, through varying techniques such as marriage, sex, and family relations, is used as a method to centralize power because of the lack of true passion and to keep stability and continuity within a society.
In 1984 and Brave New World,
…show more content…
marriage is depicted and discussed in different ways, such as in 1984 marriage is only for the purpose of producing children and in Brave New World marriage is only there for sex, which ultimately displays their definition of marriage which is lack of love between partners.
For instance, in 1984 Winston is discussing the use marriage within the Party and how Katherine (whom he was married to) only wanted to create children in their marriage and not have meaningful sex. Winston says, “The only recognized purpose of marriage was to beget children for the service of the Party. Sexual intercourse was to be looked on as a slightly disgusting minor operation, like …show more content…
having an enema. This again was never put into plain words, but in an indirect way it was rubbed into every Party member from childhood onward,.”(Orwell 65). “She had two names for it. One was ‘making a baby’, and the other was ‘our duty to the Party’,” (Orwell 67). The Party influences people from a young age itself to believe that marriage is only used for creating children to serve the Party. Orwell wrote that the marriage was only to “beget children for the service of the Party”. Orwell contrasts the meaning of marriage and sex and shows how the Party depicts sex as a crime. To echo this, Orwell said that sex was looked as a “disgusting minor operation”. Using the word disgusting shows how frowned upon sex was and pairing disgusting with minor shows how the Party preached that sex should not be on everyone’s mind rather there are more important things to focus on. When Winston informs the readers how Katherine felt about their marriage, he echoes the previous quote on what marriage truly means. Katherine devotion to the Party and her feelings of making babies is all she and Winston should be doing shows the reader that marriage isn’t a love partnership but it is rather a business relationship with the Party. In Brave New World, the Director orders a child to have sex and then further explains to a group of children about the differences between the past and present society. The Director says, “Run away now and see if you can find another little boy to play with.” “Erotic play between children had been regarded as abnormal (there was a roar of laughter); and not only abnormal, actually immoral (no!): and had therefore been rigorously suppressed.” (Huxley 32). When the Director directs a child to leave and find “another little boy to play with”, the reader can assume that Huxley is representing partnerships and marriage as irrelevant and the sole purpose during their days is to have sex. Huxley shows that marriage isn’t necessary. He rather shows that sex isn’t supposed to be “abnormal” or “immoral” but it should be a common practice. To echo this, Huxley writes the group of children listening to the Director saying “no!”. The exasperated tone of the children, indicated by the exclamation point, shows the shock the children had to hear that their past society rebutted sex. The Director coneys here that marriage isn’t a common and shouldn’t be a common practice like sex should. But through the quotes in 1984 and Brave New World, the authors intend to convey that marriage’s sole purpose is to increase the power of the the society's leaders, in this case the Party and the Director. The quotes show that both leaders as appealing and influencing the society to get on board with their beliefs and ways of living life, in this case marriage. In 1984 and Brave New World, sex is represented as a pawn in a relationship in order to successfully achieve an end goal of manipulation and the removal of affection in sex. For example, in 1984 Orwell describes Winston having sex with Julia and later, O’Brien explains how Julia manipulated Winston. Orwell wrote, “She had clasped her arms about his neck, she was calling him darling, precious one, loved one. He had pulled her down onto the ground, she was utterly unresisting, he could do what he liked to her,” (Orwell 120) “She betrayed you, Winston. Immediately-unreservedly. All her rebelliousness, her deceit, her folly.,” (Orwell 259). Julia, here, used sex as a way to manipulate Winston to join or at least consider joining the Party. In the first quote, the reader can assume that Julia and Winston are having true compassionate feelings for each other, which is represented through their sex. The author echoes this by saying that Julia called Winston “darling” and “loved one” and Winston in response felt “he could do what he like to her”. This shows how there was a presumed mutual love between the two. However; Julia’s “deceit”, “her folly” proves her manipulation of Winston. The sex they have proves to be meaningless sex which involves no real affection and compassion between the two. Orwell reiterates this when he wrote “She betrayed you, Winston”. This proves how Julia used sex almost like a pawn in chess, a sacrifice. In Brave New World, Lenina and Fanny have a conversation discussing who Lenina should have sex with next. Huxley writes, “He patted me on the behind this afternoon,’ said Lenina. ‘There you see!’ Fanny was triumphant. ‘That shows what he stands for. The strictest conventionality.” (Huxley 42). Sex in this society is regarded as a common practice, almost like an everyday chore that must get done. When Fanny reacts to Lenina saying the Director had “patted her on the behind” by saying “There you see!”, the reader can assume the normality this is considered within the society. Lenina lack of a negative perception on the Director shows how sex is nothing other than a tool that is in place to achieve a common practice. The author echoes by having Fanny say that the Director stands for the “strictest conventionality”. The word conventionality shows that sex is merely in place to be there and have sex which shows that love between two people when having sex in this society is non-existent and therefore used to maximize the Director’s power. Through both novels, the authors both convey the same theme that sex is used to increase one’s power. In 1984 and Brave New World, family relations are presented as a gimmick in order to achieve the end goal of increasing one’s own power through deception. For example, O’Brien is asking Winston a series of questions as an initiation into the “Brotherhood” a rebellious group of the Party when in reality Winston realizes O’Brien is part of the Party. Orwell writes, “The Brotherhood, we call it. You will never learn much more about the Brotherhood than that it exists and that you belong to it.” “You are prepared to commit murder?” “You are prepared to cheat, to forge… to do anything that is likely to cause demoralization and weaken the power of the Party?” (Orwell 171-172). “He was the tormentor, he was the protector, he was the inquisitor, he was the friend,” (Orwell 244). By using words like “we call it” O’Brien uses deception to deceive Winston into believing he belongs to this family and that he should be part of the cause. To reiterate this, O’Brien said that Winston “belongs to it”. This gives Winston the false sense of hope that O’Brien intends Winston to have. However; O’Brien displays his deception when Winston labels O’Brien as a member of the Party. Winston uses words like “tormentor” to describe how O’Brien acts within in the Party and “protector” to symbolize O’Brien as the leader. The reader can see O’Brien’s deception when Winston says that he was “the friend”. Using “friend” tells the reader that O’Brien manipulated Winston into the Party to increase and strengthen his own power. In Brave New World, the Director is explaining to a boy how family was downgraded in their society. “In brief,” the Director summed up, “the parents were the father and the mother.” The smut that was really science fell with a crash into the boy's eye-avoiding silence. “Mother,” he repeated loudly rubbing in the science; and, leaning back in his chair, “These,” he said gravely, “are unpleasant facts; I know it. But then most historical facts are unpleasant.” (“For you must remember that in those days of gross viviparous reproduction, children were always brought up by their parents and not in State Conditioning Centres.”) (Huxley 24). When the boy labels the idea that parents were the father and mother as “smut that was science”, the reader can assume that family and family ideas were disapproved by the society. To echo this the boy relates the idea as being an “unpleasant fact”. This shows how the idea causes tension within him and the fact is hard to see being a reality. Also, the idea of family and fathers and mothers were referred to as “gross viviparous reproduction”. This relates to the idea that family is something of an afterthought and something that should never be practiced. The reader can really see the societies deception when referring to children being brought up by parents in the past and not in current societal conditions. This shows how the “State” wants to abolish and attack the meaning of family to increase its own power. Societies can be different in many ways, however in the cases of 1984 and Brave New World there are two authors trying to show their societies in similar ways.
Throughout both novels themes of marriage, sex, and family is constantly depicted. But both authors intend to convey the larger hidden theme which is that these subthemes are used to help exemplify the power the head’s of both societies have through the manipulation and abuse of this power on the society
itself.
Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the twentieth century. Philosophical optimism of a bright future held by humanity in general was taken advantage of by the promise of a better life through sacrifice of individuality to the state. In the books Brave New World, 1984, and Fahrenheit 451 clear opposition to these subtle entrapments was voiced in similarly convincing ways. They first all established, to varying degrees of balance, the atmosphere and seductiveness of the “utopia” and the fear of the consequences of acting in the non-prescribed way through character development. A single character is alienated because of their inability to conform – often in protest to the forced conditions of happiness and well being. Their struggle is to hide this fact from the state’s relentless supervision of (supposedly) everything. This leads them to eventually come into conflict with some hand of the state which serves as the authors voice presenting the reader with the ‘absurdity’ of the principles on which the society is based. The similar fear of the state’s abuse of power and technology at the expense of human individuality present within these novels speaks to the relevance of these novels within their historical context and their usefulness for awakening people to the horrendous consequences of their ignorance.
North Korea, China, and even Cuba are similar to 1984. They try to control their people just the same as in 1984, and just like in Jonestown. The only people who were free in 1984 were the Proles. The community in Jonestown began as everyone wanting to be there, and then as conditions worsened the people wanted to leave. They were not allowed to, much like 1984. The people in both situations are similar, in that they are oppressed by their governments, but only the people in Jonestown are given the ability to think they are even able to
Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, exemplifies the idea that in an ever-growing modern world, one who demonstrates traditional values about love will be unable to cope up with the questionable morals and differentiating, controversial values present, seen through John’s difficult experience in the Brave New World. In the novel, there is a severe disconnect between what John was taught and the ideals of the Brave New World, which encouraged ruthless, unemotional, and quick interactions with someone found attractive instead of a stable relationship with a loved one. As a result, John struggled greatly to try to adapt to the Brave New World while still trying to maintain his own values, and proved to be unfit to stay there. It is evident that John could have never survived in such a society, due to the great difference in between both of their morals, and the Brave New World’s disapproval of his own values, seen through John’s reaction to the recreational activities, the people in the Brave New World’s mockery of his most favorite pieces of literature, which formed his ideas on love, and finally in his own relationship with Lenina. However, while John’s downward spiral of his mental and emotional state in the Brave New World and his unwillingness to accept their values cause him to leave London, his final conformity and unwilling acceptance to the Brave New World ideals cause the final tragedy at the end of the novel, revealing that he would have never been able to survive in this society, for he was bound to be tainted by their values.
According to Neil Postman’s Amusing Ourselves to Death, Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World both predicted that society would eventually be governed by a global totalitarian system; however, the key difference between both their predictions is the method by which society’s cognizance would be undermined. Orwell claimed that contemporary society would be controlled by overt modes of policing and supervising the social hierarchy, whereas Huxley stated that society’s infatuation with entertainment and superficial pleasure alone would be enough for the government to have absolute control over the public. Unfortunately, today’s society is not an Animal Farm. All jokes aside, Postman’s assertion of Huxley’s theory, “what
In the article excerpt, social critic Neil Postman describes two dystopian novels: George Orwell’s 1984, and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. Postman compares which novel is more relevant to today’s society, and leans more towards Brave New World. When both novels are compared side by side, it is evident that Huxley’s world is indeed more relative to modern day civilization.
The movie and the book are different in many ways but at the same time they have a lot of things in common, the movie doesn't have as much details as the book does but it is a very good movie. In the movie you can very easily see and understand what's going on being you are watching the whole thing with your eyes. The movie also shows you how the students have to fight each and everyday just so that they protect themselves in the streets, the streets is all they know because well they were born and raised in the streets so they learned all about it & are about it. In the movie you can clearly see the struggle they go through, and how the streets are & when they're in school. School is supposed to be a safe place for all kids.
Finally, even though, for a long time, the roles of woman in a relationship have been established to be what I already explained, we see that these two protagonists broke that conception and established new ways of behaving in them. One did it by having an affair with another man and expressing freely her sexuality and the other by breaking free from the prison her marriage represented and discovering her true self. The idea that unites the both is that, in their own way, they defied many beliefs and started a new way of thinking and a new perception of life, love and relationships.
Love is an emotion affecting people's everyday lives. In the book “1984,”, George Orwell introduces his readers to this idea, with a compelling portrayal of this important feeling. In Orwell’s totalitarian society of Oceania, the ruling party attempts to demolish all love for anyone except Big Brother who controls them. The affection that normally exists between individuals, in Oceania, warps to exist between individuals tortured and those torturing them. This is demonstrated by familial bonds and affection between siblings, wives, mothers, fathers and children, changing and creating an opportunity for the government to monitor its citizens. In contrast the interactions between the main character, Winston and his oppressor, O'Brien exhibit true love. Real connections between regular human beings in Oceania are virtually non existent due to actions taken by the government to destroy these bonds.
A dystopian society can be defined as “a society characterized by human misery”. 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury both demonstrate dystopian societies. However, that does not mean they do not their differences. In each society the government has different ways of controlling and limiting its citizens for doing only what they want them to do. In 1984, violators are brainwashed into loving and following Big Brother as if they never knew the truth and return back to their everyday lives. Fahrenheit 451 also punishes violators in a way that makes them regret and scared to ever do it again instead of making them forget.
This dream of forming and maintaining a utopian society was immortalized in two novels dealing with the same basic ideas, 1984 by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Both of these novels deal with the lives of main characters that inadvertently become subversives in a totalitarian government. These two books differ greatly however with the manner in which the government controls the population and the strictness of the measures taken to maintain this stability. This essay with compare and contrast the message and tone of each novel as well as consider whether the utopia is a positive or negative one.
This Perfect Day belongs to the genre of "dystopian" or anti-utopian novels, like Huxley's Brave New World and Orwell's 1984. Yet it is more satisfying than either. This Perfect Day is probably Ira Levin's greatest work of his career. Levin's work, despite being written in 1970, is very plausible having realistic technology, such as scanners and computers which watch over the entire family, the entire population of the world. This novel could be used to show the dangers of a Utopian society as well as being full of anti-Communist and anti-racist sentiment. This Perfect Day also displays the feeling that communist and segregated institutions can be defeated, as the protagonist Chip over powers the "family" and their vile Uni Comp as well as rising above the segregated community he reaches after fleeing the family. This work could best be placed in an area of the curriculum where it is the students job to learn that although everyone might not be equal, nor should they be, they are still human and deserve to be treated with the respect and kindness we would expect to be treated with. This work could be used in conjunction with other works of literature that display the same ideals against communism and discrimination as well as a lack of compassion for others. Other works that could be used in cohorts with Levin's This Perfect Day, are Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut and even the Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood. Both of these novels show the dangers of trying to create a Utopian society and the chaos it causes. In Harrison Bergeron, handicapping has become an American institution and it is the governments responsibility to make sure that everyone is equal in every way which ends up causing chaos and rebellion. The Handmaid's Tale shows the dangers of when an extreme group takes over the United States after a nuclear holocaust, with women being placed in a submissive role to men, only being used to reproduce. This Perfect Day could also be used in a section with novels such as Uncle Tom's Cabin which portray the evils of racism and discrimination, just as the land where Chip ends up after escaping the family, is very racist and segregated. He is forced to endure the taunts and tortures of the folks who had fought Uni from the beginning, yet he rises above these bounds to return and destroy Uni Comp, thereby destroying the family.
After reading the book and watching the movie 1984 there were similarities and differences between the two. The novel is about manipulating people in believing in something that isn’t really there and about erasing history. Both the book and film focused on: authority, government, and war. The book and film follow the theme of conformity to control society.
Love is an underlying theme in the novel. Love can be seen as nonexistence in this totalitarian society. The marriage between Winston and Katherine was a disastrous one because they were only married for fifteen months and they can n...
Winston felt like sex was a rebellion. He is drawn to his lover Julia because
In the novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, relationships are a complete contrast compared to relationships in America’s society. In Brave New World relationships are just as complex as America’s society, but without the societal pressures. Relationships in Brave New World are never anything serious, so others aren’t hurt by other people having any type of relationship with someone they’ve also had a relationship with. However, America’s society places such strong meaning onto relationships that everything becomes a lot more complicated.