Branagh And Hamlet Comparison Essay

993 Words2 Pages

Hamlet, originally written by William Shakespeare, has been performed and recreated in countless approaches, each variation bringing a different experience for the audience through the creative choices that the directors make. There is Franco Zeffirelli's Hamlet (1990), Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet (1996), and lastly the latest adaption out of the three, Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet (2000). Each showcased a unique interpretation of Hamlet’s famous soliloquy, “To be or not to be.” However, there are certain choices made that enhanced and built-upon the original Hamlet play. Kenneth Branagh’s rendition is the most effective version due to its well-thought-out cinematography and the music. These strengthens Hamlet’s internal conflict of contemplating suicide, as well as the overall theme of morality. The cinematography of Kenneth Branagh’s “To be or not to be” scene makes it the most compelling. Hamlet is conversing with himself in the mirror, as though he is talking to the other side of himself that is …show more content…

Music plays a colossal part in any scene, just in light of the fact that it can either obstruct or improve it. In Branagh’s rendition, music complements the scene exceptionally well. The scene begins with only his voice as he says the well-known line, “To be or not to be”. It is not until he says, “For in that sleep of death” does the music begin. From there on, even as Branagh speaks, tension is constructed through the ominous tune that continues to crescendo. It pairs amazingly with the footsteps that Branagh takes as he approaches the mirror, because it mimics the slow pace and anxiety of the scene.
In Zeffirelli's adaptation, there is no music. Silence, however, can be more effective and I believe it works in this version. The scene takes place in the crypt full of tombs and statues. The setting is perfect for echoes which make Gibson’s voice resonate throughout the room, emphasizing the idea of

Open Document