Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages of mergers and acquisitions
Disadvantages of mergers and acquisitions
Disadvantages of mergers and acquisitions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disadvantages of mergers and acquisitions
Introduction This essay examines the vertical chain of the recent strategic alliance of BlackBerry and Foxconn. The examination utilizes the make-or-buy issue tree to uncover the strategic and economic rationale for the vertical chain. The essay then goes on to evaluate the vertical chain using the concepts of Transaction Cost Economics, revealing any potential economic hazards that could have a negative impact on the efficiency and effectiveness of the vertical chain. Strategic Alliance of Blackberry and Foxconn On 20th December 2013, it was announced that BlackBerry and Foxconn had agreed a 5 year strategic alliance whereby Foxconn will design, manufacture and sell consumer BlackBerry devices in Indonesia and other emerging markets (Taylor and Mishkin, 2013). To develop our understanding of this alliance, one must view it in the context of both BlackBerry’s and Foxconn’s recent performance in the markets. With regard to BlackBerry, 2013 was a difficult year for the Canadian smartphone maker. The failed market penetration of the BlackBerry Z10 smartphone severely dented its cash reserves, contributing to the unsuccessful attempt to sell itself. The former also left BlackBerry with a $960 million write-down on unsold inventory (Miller, 2013), indicating excess capacity within its vertical chain. With regard to Foxconn, the Taiwanese electronics manufacturing, announced that in the 1st quarter of 2013 revenue was down 19.2% compared with the same period last year, citing the decline in iPhone and iPad orders from Apple as being the major culprit (Yang, 2013). With Apple being their biggest customer, Foxconn recognized the need to change strategy and de-risk its dependency on Apple. Understanding this landscape, one can b... ... middle of paper ... ...epts of the transaction cost economics theory in order to understand the rationale for its structure along the vertical chain. It concludes this examination by suggesting that BlackBerry’s primary motivation for its strategic alliance with Foxconn, is to exploit Foxconn’s scale and learning economies. Foxconn’s motivation is to alter its structure along the vertical chain in order to align to its new business strategy. This provides further evidence to support Alfred Chandler’s theory that structure follows strategy (Chandler, A. 1998 cited in Besanko, D. et al. 2010). The evaluation of the strategic alliance from a TCE perspective has identified bounded rationality and opportunism as sources of potential economic hazards that could create inefficiencies in the vertical chain. Further investigation would be required to identify the extent of these efficiencies.
Delta’s purchase of the Trainer Refinery and the merger with Virgin Airlines are clear examples of grand strategies. Delta sought these strategies to achieve long-term business objectives. Delta recognized hurdles in achieving profit posed by increased costs associated with jet fuel (and their incredible dependence on fuel as an operating cost) and a lack of access to the international market for trans-Atlantic flights. In order to achieve these objectives Delta employed two different strategies. The first was vertical acquisition. By purchasing a refinery, Delta was acquiring a supplier and the inputs that it needed for operations. More specifically, this is an example of backward vertical integration because Trainer “operates at an
Arthur, A., Thompson, Margaret, A., Peteraf, John, E. Gamble, A., J., Strickland III. (2014). Crafting & Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage 19e: Concepts & Cases. C6-C25.
Miller (2014) published an article about the stopgap measure currently made by BlackBerry, which was bring back a discontinued smart phone - Bold, in order to conform to customers’ preference and tide over customers since their new devices are not ready at present. While BlackBerry is struggling to recover from the continued financial losses these years, attributed to the increasingly intense competition and high global unemployment rate. Although John Chen, the Chief Executive Officer of BlackBerry, shows confidence of BlackBerry’s future performance and development as the financial losses was narrower during the last fiscal year, it is estimated that BlackBerry won’t start expanding and stop loosing money until the fiscal year 2016.
Samsung’s cost advantage is clearly visible from the comparison of costs (and their elements) that were borne by the company and its competitors in 2003 (Tab. 3): Samsung’s overall cost was 24 per cent lower than the weighted average cost of the other four producers; two most significant elements of the cost structure, i.e. raw materials and labour, were 36 and 27 per cent lower respectively. When expressed by means of a relation of average selling price to costs (“productivity” of cost elements), the differences are even more visible (comp. Tab. 4 ): overall superiority of Samsung over its competitors exceeded 51 per cent!
There are four strategies businesses choose from. The first is corporate level strategy which assist companies in selecting new business strategies that is anticipated to increase its worth. Second, is merger and acquisition strategy where two companies assimilate or one company buys out another business. Thirdly, international Strategy concentrated on selling products and services outside of the national market. Finally, cooperative strategy affords companies the opportunity to join forces to achieve a common goal. (Hitt, Reland, Hoskinsson,
Besanko, D., Dranove, D., Shanley, M., & Schaefer, S. (2013). Economics of Strategy. United States of America : John Wiley & Sons Inc.
A company’s value chain can be created through a number of avenues. Tangible and intangible resources including knowledge, capabilities, skilled human resources, information systems, and company infrastructure can each be a distinctive competency. However, the multi-faceted business environment and industry dynamics can effectively erase a company’s advantage over time. This is particularly true with tangible resources. It’s easy for competitors to imitate one another. For example, all players in the package courier industry have invested heavily in tracking technology, shipping labels, and scanners. When UPS decided to move into the retail industry and acquired Mail Box Etc. in 2001, FedEx followed suit and acquired Kinko’s in 2004 (Hill & Jones, 2011). Marketing strategies related to pricing and promotions are also highly coveted.
Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard business review, 86(1), 25-40.
Madhok, A. (1997), “Cost, Value and Foreign Market Entry Mode: The Transaction and the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 39-62.
significant activities in the strategic way better than the rivalry firms (Lüsted, 2012). It is
M&A are rational and strategic alliances that are conducted in the best interest of the organization and its shareholders in order to improve the financial ...
However, were increasing opportunities to do business while less the power of control may is some concerns that the owner has to think before make a decision. (Suarez and Canal, 2003) commented that the benefit of strategic alliances can help the company improve the competitive of opportunity, such as a company might be turning a potential rival into a partner which helps each other’s or the benefit in term of revenue because that can turn create new market opportunities, it is allowing for imitation or competition in the same market was more difficult.
While nowadays there is a current perspective about strategic alliance that goes beyond the traditional view and it consists of:
Porter, M. E., 1999. The Five Forces that Shape Competitive Strategy. Harvard business review, p. 80.
Because of high legal expenses mergers and acquisitions is costly due to which cost of acquiring a new firm would not be profitable in the short run. This is the reason that merger and acquisition is considered as strategic corporate decision other than tactical manoeuvre. The process of mergers and acquisitions can be worsened by the opportunity cost. When the same amount of investment is made, this cost takes place for generating higher financial returns (Chen, et al., 2015).