Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges of strategic alliances
Challenges of strategic alliances
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenges of strategic alliances
Strategic alliances: Strategic alliances is an agreement between two or more companies to work together for a certain time in order to achieve some business objectives, help each other reach new technologies or to be able to build core competencies against other competitors. The traditional view about Strategic alliances is that they were formed for: - Defensive to protect profits - Means for preempting competition - Competitive and win - lose orientation. While nowadays there is a current perspective about strategic alliance that goes beyond the traditional view and it consists of: - Collaboration can create opportunities for all participants to be successful - Can create multiple sources of competitive advantage - Win † win orientation that relies on both collaboration and competition. Strategic alliances could be formed for the following reasons: 1) Technology exchange: most of the recent strategic alliances (more than 50 %) are formed for technology exchange. this is done to obtain the necessary capabilities and resources needed for creating new technology or using some technologies to develop the companies’ competencies. 2) Global competition: strategic alliances are formed in order to allow the partners to build up more strength and be able to be more competitive in the global market against a common enemy better than each one fights alone. 3) Industry convergence: by this it means company gets together and become a single company in order to achieve more success in a certain industry. Risk that faces strategic alliances: Most alliances that work are done between two companies from industrial countries. But even any kind of strategic alliance has some risks that might occur during this partnership: - Strategic alliances are sometimes used by partners to build competitive advantages against each other, or might even make one partners stronger than the other that will manage to take more market share from him. This will result in creating a new competitor for a partner that might enter a strategic alliance. To avoid this risk, partners signs agreement for example, that after the period of the strategic alliance is over, the partner is not allowed to use this certain technology before at least 3 years of time. - The inability of partners to take advantage of or to effect technology transfer between the two partners. This can avoid by trying to understand the different cultures of the two partners and what could be the best way of getting the two sides communicate and exchange technology in an equal and fair way. - Another risk is leadership. Who will control who? Who will take the decisions in the strategic alliances?
How can firms minimize or manage the bumps, hurdles, or conflicts that often occur when firms join together in an alliance or partnership?
Since the company was slow in both innovation and growth, it was time to make a life-changing decision for the company. Atul insisted on keeping the culture of debt-free and not accepting any external capital (for the past 15 years), however, the company was not doing great during that time. The case described that TEOCO primarily focused on North America telecom carriers, because of globalization, the company needed to expand its business worldwide. Therefore, TA Associates was the right choice for TEOCO in favor of equity investment. Partnering with TA Associates will help to strengthen TEOCO’s current financial condition as well as provide a strong support for the global network of relationships, according to Calo et al. (n.d.).
Sharing of knowledge, technology, and capital that are brought to the company by the partner.
Conclusion: By weighing the above analyzed pros and cons of forming alliance in form of either partnership or code sharing, it looks logical to use this strategy to speed up the expansion process for gaining differentiation from competitors that are already offering relatable cheap prices compare to southwest. The alliances can help maintain low cost leadership throughout the industry while helping in global expansion.
However, the concerns of partnering with a firm can lead to exploitation or copy/take away proprietary, competency, technique or technology, which will harm future long term gains.
significant activities in the strategic way better than the rivalry firms (Lüsted, 2012). It is
Some challenges are business related. Many software suppliers use non-standard software to "lock in” vendors - i.e. make it difficult to migrate their data to a competitor. Business models that are predicated on historical service delivery models, such as face-to-face, fee-for-service consultations often penalize remote service delivery.
Although this is not the case with Emirates, other airlines form alliances such as Skyteam and Star Alliance, not only to achieve network size economies, but also bargaining power when purchasing fuel or even aircraft.
Two or more firms combined together to face the competitive situation. It refers to the combination of different firms for their mutual benefits.
Organisational change can arise due to a change in strategy and this begins with examining capabilities and the internal environment. This is portrayed in the Strategy diamond. Firstly through arenas the organisation can plan where they will be active in and which part to place most emphasis on for example technologies or value creation strategies. Only after determining this can they implement a positive change, leading to the next element, vehicles to get them where they need to be such as alliances. This can lead to change in management along with strategic partnerships, and the way managers transition to this change will determine if the strategy impacts on the overall organisation in a way that reinforces its purpose and goals. Partnerships indicate how an organisation can strengthen its capabilities by merging with businesses who possess the skills they lack. (Carpenter et al. 2010)
Besides the opportunities, there are some threats faced by business as well. These include the competitors at first place.
High degree of interdependence: the behaviour of firms are affected by what they believe other rivalry firms might do
Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, (1996) examine the formation of strategic alliances through two themes - strategic needs for cooperation and social opportunities for cooperation. They posit that firms form strategic alliances when they are in vulnerable strategic positions – which can be because they may be struggling with unstructured markets or ambiguous/uncertain scenarios – such as competing in emergent or highly competitive markets or introducing pioneering technical strategies. For instance, for innovative firms, the role of complementary assets becomes crucial for diffusion of new innovation. Complementary assets reflect the interdependencies of assets and they must evolve in parallel with the new innovation; otherwise it becomes a constraint
The same is true at the “brand” level. Once a company steps out of its domestic market, it gets to know other rivalries that are present at the level above the one, the brand currently is. This helps in gaining information about those rivalries, their strengths, their weakness and everything about it, so that once it gets into market, it feels less to no difficulty in creating conditions beneficial for its survival. Or instead of throwing the competition out, one can try to be friends with them and combined, they both can be able to do awesome