Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organizational behavior chapter 15 study
Organizational behavior chapter 15 study
Organizational behavior chapter 15 study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organizational behavior chapter 15 study
Big Five-Personality Test
Organizational Behaviour studies the individual or group dynamics in an organizational setting. Understanding the personality of an individual is crucial in understanding how he/she will perform in a particular work culture. Modern workplace is a dynamic place where people from diverse backgrounds come together. The big-five personality test helps foresee how individuals are likely to interact and communicate in a work environment. Personality in the organizational behaviour setting refers to the ability of an individual to fit into a particular organization. The five factor model for personality assessments was first proposed by Tupes & Christal (1961) and Norman (1963) and later it was taken ahead by Goldberg (1981).
Extraversion 45(3)
The attribute of extraversion is most commonly linked with leadership qualities in the organizational framework(Judge et al. 2002). Extraversion is often linked with a better engagement with co-workers(Hogan et al. 1994). The extraverts have good people-skills and have higher energy levels. People, who score high on the extraversion scale are likely to be assertive and action-oriented in the workplace. Extraversion is related to social leadership, therefore extraverts are better at motivating co-workers (McCrae & Costa Jr 1997)
A score of 45 percentile indicates an average amount of extraversion. An average score means that the person is less likely to be perceived as brash or over-the-top.
Conscientiousness 33(3.1)
Conscientiousness factors in the way a person controls or redirects their impulses. In the framework of organizational behaviour, it relates to better time-management skills and ability to accomplish tasks within a deadline....
... middle of paper ...
...ct effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), p.36.
Lord, R.G., De Vader, C.L. & Alliger, G.M., 1986. A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), p.402.
McCrae, R.R. & Costa Jr, P.T., 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American psychologist, 52(5), p.509.
Norman, W.T., 1963. Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), p.574.
Tupes, E.C. & Christal, R.E., 1961. Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings, DTIC Document.
Watson, D. & Clark, L.A., 1997. Extraversion and its positive emotional core.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2013). Theories of personality (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2013). Theories of personality (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth.
Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (2001). Leadership: Do traits Matter? Academy of Management Executive,5,, 48-60.
Over several decades, independent streams of systematic research into personality traits have converged on the same general conclusion: the domain of personality attributes can be described by five superordinate constructs (Digman, 1990). These five general, robust factors of personality are now called the “Big Five” and subsume as well as abstract, more specific personal attributes, dispositions, habits and behaviours as a framework (cf. Digman, 1990; MCRae and Costa, 1989; Wiggins and Pincus, 1992). The five global traits in this frame work are: (1) Extraversion, described by a need for stimulation, activity, assertiveness, and quantity and intensity of interpersonal interaction; (2) Agreeableness, represented
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of Personality (7th ed.). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cervone, D., Pervin, L. A. (2008). Personality: Theory and research (10th Ed.). New York: Wiley.
Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. A. (2009). Theories of personality. New York:
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Journal of personality and social psychology and. Retrieved from http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~broberts/Hazan & Shaver, 1987.pdf
Extraversion is marked by pronounced engagement with the external world. Extraverts enjoy eing with people, are full of energy, and often experience positive emotions. They tend to be enthusiastic, action-oriented, individuals who are likely to say "Yes!" or "Let's go!" to opportunities for excitement. In groups they like to talk, assert themselves, and draw attention to themselves. (Beaumont 2003)
There has yet to be any determining evidence defines the characteristics of extraversion. The experimenters in this particular experiment have hypothesized that the facets of extraversion are somehow linked by reward sensitivity. This hypothesis was also tested against a model in which they are linked by sociability. There has been much work on this topic in the past, beginning with the works of Jung and James in the early 20th century—to the work of Watson and Clark in 1997. And even after a century of study, they are still unable to truly define the characteristics of the extraversion dimension of personality. In the many attempts to define extraversion, Watson and Clark have defined six basic facets of the personality trait. These are: venturesome, affiliation, positive affectivity, energy, ascendance, and ambition. Researchers Depue and Collins, in 1999, also offered a more succinct depiction of the characteristics of extraversion, this only having three basic parts. The first being affiliation, the enjoyment and value of close interpersonal bonds, also being warm and affectionate. The second, agency, being socially dominant, enjoying leadership roles, being assertive and exhibitionistic, and having a sense of potency in accomplishing goals. The final facet being impuslivity, but this one has been argued upon whether it should be included at all in the characteristics of extraversion at all.
Raymond B. Cattell (1906-1998) studied the personality traits of large groups of people, calling the visible features of their personalities “surface traits.” During his studies, Cattell observed that certain “surface traits” would appear simultaneously in individuals. When Cattell noticed this trend occurring frequently he renamed the group of “surface traits” “source traits”. At the conclusion of his research Cattell identified sixteen “source traits.”
Schultz, D.P. & Schultz, S.E. (2009). Theories of Personality, Ninth Edition. US: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2) On Conscientiousness, I rank very high – 86%. I also agree with this placement. I am well-organized and reliable. I feel that this part of my personality weighs down my openness to new experiences above. I’m very careful and calculated, taking care to get things right. 3) In Extraversion I ranked very low at just 7 percent. This is probably an accurate depiction, but if you asked most people who know me they wouldn’t rank me that low. I am a quiet, thoughtful person and I prefer small groups to large crowds. I am perfectly happy spending quiet time on my own. I actually work very hard at being more outgoing and forcing myself to talk to people in social situations where I would feel more comfortable melding into the background.
Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (5th ed). Boston , MA, USA: Pearson