Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors which influence leadership style
Factors affecting leadership style
Factors that will influence leadership styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors which influence leadership style
Autocratic Leadership
Autocratic or dictatorial leaders form a strict rift between the one giving the orders and those believed to obey them. As such, dictators often make decisions individually, which can cause misuse of power and make their supporters feel left out. It is observed that creativity declines under autocratic leadership. The autocratic leadership style is identified as leader-focused. Authority is centralized and power is gained from being in absolute control of circumstances. In managerial context, employees are not requested for their input. This style may be used solely by a leader, or it may be used when there is little time to make decisions or refer others.
An autocratic management style is when the manager makes choices
…show more content…
These orders need to be obeyed instantly by the staff so that further troubles are impeded. This style is used in the military and police forces where commands are given and need to be followed seriously without reluctance or doubts.
Democratic Leadership
Democratic leaders are generally found to be more effective than autocrats. Democratic leaders offer direction to their team members and obtain their input in making decisions. The employees in the democratic group generally have lesser yield than the authoritarian group but their work are of higher quality. Democratic leaders inspire group members to contribute but hold the final decision over critical matters. This style creates stability, and helps team members feel
…show more content…
Autocratic leadership tends to be more disciplinary and the innate micro-management amplifies role obscurity, decreases productivity, and reduces group accord.
The democratic approach on the other hand works best when it is visibly supported by higher authority, members are well-educated, leaders have the skills to conduct meetings with the members, and time can be afforded for trust to develop. If these factors exist, then the democratic approach results in higher rates of productivity, reduced personnel turnover, reduced absenteeism, and better employee physical and mental
The post-bureaucratic era has seen changes in practices from an autocratic to a democratic leadership style. However, such dynamic changes have refurbished bureaucratic principles, characterising it as a “hybrid” of “democratic principles” and the “Weberian Ideal-type” (Clegg and Courpasson 2004, pg 54). In this essay, I argue that contemporary leadership practices embody post-bureaucratic ideals to an extent, as prior-bureaucratic methods are still interpolated. In section one, I’ll evaluate the competency-based management approach success and individualistic notion, however contrasting on how it’s “repetitive refrain” hinders Post-heroic” forms of leadership, by calling on the views of Bolden and Gosling (2006 pg3). In addition to I’ll be comparing research (e.g.
...ader should understand their employees. As discussed the authoritarian leadership is not the best way. As a leader one must include the subordinates into a team and respect their opinions. Leaders should know how to motivate by encouragement and to find out what your employees want and find a way to give it to them or to enable them to earn it.
The only challenge I may have is the slow decision making process when trying to include members in the decision making process. However, the advantage is that I would work with team members to make decisions which in return should increase their productivity because they are more involved in the process. The democratic leadership is also my preferred style because I’m more of a team player versus an autocratic leader. I would not demand my followers to do any task, I prefer to motivate my followers to success.
If the inputs are seen as used, employees are likely to feel as though they had a positive impact; if the inputs are consistently rejected, employees are likely to feel that their time has been wasted. Participative leaders clearly decentralize authority. Participative decisions are not unilateral, as with the autocrat, because they use
In democratic style, leaders hand over the power to employees and make decision to discuss with the others.
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
During the second attempt, I chose to adopt a democratic style of leadership. Once again, I was no more informed than any other member of the group concerning the correct performance of the task; hence I chose not to make autocratic decisions. I did however note the need for structure in any given task. Therefore, the...
Autocratic II (A2). The leader takes a decision based on the information that is requested from the team members. This differs from the above type of leadership in the only aspect that the leader doesn’t have all the necessary information to arrive at a decision and requests the same from the team members.
On projects I have taken the lead on, I have always valued input from other employees. This assumes the fact that the employee is competent in their area, and have a willingness to share ideas with management. I encourage active participation, and I am often surprised at some of the answers that have come out of collaborative meetings. When employees feel at ease to share their ideas, genuinely good things
Democratic leadership and transformational leadership should have been used in this instance. Democratic leadership involves the opinion of the other team members, with the final decision on the leader, usually with an equal vote Kelly, P., & Tazbir, J. (2014).. Transformational leadership exhibits a true leader because of the skills of encouraging and displaying optimal communication, teamwork, and professional collaboration to help personnel deal with the healthcare industry's daily challenges and its future changes and uncertainties (Tinkham,
John Terrill, an experienced professional with a unique approach to managing, was brought into to DGL International to correct the productivity issues evident in the technical services division. As a leader, his approach would require professionalism, as well as an alternative method of management to restore the lacking work ethic of the engineers. Through investigative research into well-defined leadership styles, behaviours and power types, the following case study questions are discussed below. Using Paul Hershey and Ken Blanchard’s situational leadership theory, I compare the autocratic with the democratic approaches to leadership, as well as discuss the four styles of leading: telling, selling, participative or delegating. I also address the type of power Terrill appears to possess over his followers and compare multiple options. Though Terrill proved to be a successful development to the company’s management team, the repercussions and advantages of alternative approaches are also addressed in conjunction with Robert House’s path-goal theory.
An autocratic style of leadership is also known as an authoritarian leadership style of managing. Autocratic leaders are those who believe in individual control over all and every decision. Autocratic leaders also do not believe in any inputs from group members. Leaders that practice autocratic style of leadership normally make business choices based on their own agendas and judgments and never accept recommendations from their subordinates.
Over the course of my professional career in different organizations in the past three years, I have worked under many managers. This has been a learning curve for me to understand the different managing styles and leadership characteristics of people. One of the managers whom I worked under, was the lead in a government project which also happened to be my last project before I took a break for continuing my studies, is a person I admire till date. I learned several life lessons in addition to the technical subject associated with the industry. This paper demonstrates the leadership styles exhibited by my manager with suitable examples.
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)