When comparing sources such as Authoritative sources from Popular sources you will see they have substantial differences. Throughout this paper, I was able to compare and contrast an authoritative source to a popular source, to help further distinguish the differences that arise between them. Additionally, when looking at authoritative sources and popular sources within my discipline, Exercise Physiology. One becomes able to uncover the differences as well. Popular sources depend on an audience and focus group, while authoritative sources are factual and require a strict peer review for creditability. The way authoritative and popular sources are constructed, the amount of information, and the audience is what dictates an authoritative source …show more content…
M. (2015). A witness to fitness: Contextualizing processes in exercise physiology.” One can validate that the juxtaposition of an abstract that forms around this article that this source is Authoritative. Additionally, one can perceive the respectability of the source in view of the signs that outlines, diagrams, and delineations are absent. It's similarly minded that this is a respectable source since one can recognize the associated audit inside the article. Every legitimate source experiences an extraordinary peer review framework, to ensure the honorableness of the source and to build up honesty inside the article. The authentic based data inside the article shows that of a scholarly source. When investigating a popular source layout, one is able to determine a popular source through characteristics such as advertisements, charts/graphs, and illustrations. For example, the source by Klein, S. (2013, October 25) “This is what happens to your body when you exercise.” On the website “Huffingtonpost.com” this reading clearly represents characteristics of a popular source, one can determine that multiple advertisements demonstrate these characteristics. Furthermore, this website was published online through the representation of a “.com” address immediate red flag. This determines whether the source is scholarly or not. Authoritative sources, which are usually published through other exemplifications such as, (.Org, .Gov, .Edu, etc.) determine whether you know if the source is Authoritative or not. At last, the absence of companion survey appears yet another normal for a Popular source. In this way, one can decide this source as a popular source instead of a scholarly
Metzger, M. J. (2010). Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078-2091. doi:10.1002/asi.20672
...when just using a website. When using a website you already knew what kind of article you had before reading it. Also many of the sources on the database were quite lengthy which made it harder to get information out of it. Although finding source wasn’t like what I was use to I was able to manage finding the ones I needed to complete the papers required for the class.
The digital worlds effect on reading In an age where information is readily accessible on any whim, the way we process information has undergone significant changes throughout history. Mike Bunns' "How to Read Like a Writer” dives deep into the idea of reading from the perspective of the author, underscoring the importance of analyzing text for a deeper understanding. Karen Rosenburg, in “Reading Games: Strategies for Reading Scholarly Sources,” offers a perspective on valuable reading strategies, particularly when dealing with scholarly sources. Nicholas Carr, in “Is Google Making Us Stupid”? What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains.”
Is the information consistent with the information found in print sources, other Web sites, newsgroups, or mailing lists? Is the evidence contained within the source sufficient, reliable, and relevant to your topic? I have seen some of the same info from this site on other sites. It does match.
Human development has drastically changed within the exercise and fitness industry since the 1940’s. This industry is now one of the largest, most studied, and sought out aspects of human life. Many people depend on exercise to sustain their health and change their bodies both physically and mentally. Specifically, many look to change their body composition, meaning how much muscular lean tissue and fat they have (Zanker, Cathy, and Louise). In many circumstances, such changes to one’s body are heavily scrutinized and evaluated against social norms (O’Donnell). Exercise to improve body composition can be done using two different methods, anaerobic and aerobic exercise. In regards to improving body composition, anaerobic exercise's effects are
That alone provides a great source of credibility to the paper. The idea that this is an author who has done the research, gathered the numbers, and analyzed the data, allows the reader to rest in the idea that they are reading a valid article, and receiving good, hard, evidence. Twenge also uses a very logical tone throughout her article, maintaining the idea that the data is as clear as day, and that there is no disproving it; the numbers show true facts.
The steps taken to search for information that already exists about the topic include using scholarly search engines to gather a se...
Song, Fujian, Lee Hooper, and Yoon K. Loke. "Publication Bias: What Is It? How Do We Measure It? How Do We Avoid It?" Dovepress Journal, July 2013. Web. 23 Nov. 2013.
After reading this paper, there should be a better understanding of how the media incorrectly portrays these ideas. First, I’m going to focus on how the media destroys people motivation by displaying misleading photos in their advertisements. Most gyms, workout facilities, and athletic wear clothing get models that are very physically fit to advertise their company in their commercials, which is understandable because you do want the best to advertise your product. But when using people that look like they have been in the gym working out for over ten years, it can be very discouraging to the person that is just trying to start working out. And even more discouraging, most gyms will use models that use supplements that help improve their body size and strength.
Now that we are living in an ever changing world, technology is viewed as the most resourceful tool in keeping up with the pace. Without the use of technology, communication would be limited to using mail for delivery and encyclopedias for research. Although technology has improved the way we communicate and find information for research, the information is not always valid. Unfortunately, for those of us who use the internet for shopping, research, or reading articles of personal interest the information is not treated the same as a your magazine or book. While such literature is reviewed by an editorial staff, internet literature or information can be published by anyone. In order to reap the full benefit of having the use of technology for any purpose, there are five basic criteria’s one must keep in mind as an evaluating tool for deciding whether or not the particular website is a reliable source for information.
The site it came from is credible because of its use of citations at the bottom of the page and how they are marked out the citations throughout the paper. The graph is also a nice touch, because it gives a nice perspective of how science and the Roman Catholic Church worked when the two came at odds.
The objective of this essay is to compare Internet research with other sources of information which include books, word of mouth and primary research. This paper will also look at ways of ascertaining the validity of research information for academic work.
Research which has been conducted on the use of hyperlinks or hypertexts in online journalism have relied on the methodology of quantitative content analyses to count the number off links present in online news sites.
The Bibliographic Chain is a process whereby information proceeds through an individual’s imagination/mind to its final resting place which may be in the format of an encyclopaedia summary [1]. The Bibliographic Chain contains eleven progressive links which consists of: knowledge within human resources; information created by institutions; documents that are currently being worked on; unpublished studies and findings; periodicals; reports and monographs; services (indexing and abstracting); bibliographic lists and essays/reports; yearly reviews and prolific reports, books and encyclopaedic summaries [5].
With the advancement of technology and the exponential increase of Internet use, professionals-academic and business-are relying on electronic resources for information, research, and data. The Internet gives an individual access to a sea of information, data, and knowledge; plus, this vast amount of information is available in a matter of seconds, rather than hours or days. The ease of access, availability, up-to-the-second timeliness, and vastness of online resources is causing many professionals, however, to forgo the use of print sources. Online resources are useful to conduct scholarly research and 'may be convenient, but they have shortcomings that make print sources necessary for submitting high-quality assignments' (Dilevko & Gottieb, 2002, ¶ 1).