Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Power politics in Macbeth
Power politics in Macbeth
Reflections about plato's republic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Power politics in Macbeth
“Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much” (Helen Keller). Working alone can only get you so far, but with more minds being put together, there’s more opportunity for ideas. A group of people can get more done efficiently than alone. Working together is more effective than working alone because you can get stronger and better ideas. Authoritative leadership is less effective than collaborative leadership because fear and power create anarchy and dissent, while respect and decency create a harmonious society. This claim can be supported by Macbeth, Machiavelli, Crace, and Plato.
Firstly, authoritative leadership is less effective than collaborative leadership because anarchy is created through fear and power. In the
…show more content…
When Macbeth becomes King, and realizes that his kingship means nothing; he decides to just act without a thought. In Macbeth it says, “From this moment the very firstlings of my heart shall be the firstlings of my hand.” (Act 4, Scene 1, Line 146 - 148). Macbeth says that he will no longer think before he acts. He is no longer going to think about the rights or wrongs, or what’s best for the people who he leads. Conversely, a leader should have an element of rational thought before they act, in order to lead effectively. In The Republic it says, “...the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy, and political greatness and wisdom meet in one...cities will never have rest from their evils…” (Plato). Plato is saying that a king must be smart when he is leading and have good philosophies that will be good for the people. A leader can not just act without philosophy or evil will never be rid from his country. A leader must think first with good philosophy and then act in good nature for the benefit of the …show more content…
This way of leading is faulty and not effective because under an authoritative leader usually does not praise people for their hard work. In Macbeth it says, “To give thee from our royal master thanks...And, for an earnest of a greater honor, he bade me, from him, call thee thane of Cawdor: in which addition, hail, most worthy thane, for it is thine.” (Act 1, Scene 3, Line 101 - 107). King Duncan is rewarding Macbeth with the title of Thane of Cawdor for Macbeth’s great service to the king. King Duncan praises his people for their good deeds and even rewards them. Similarly, employees work better after getting praise from their boss. They feel proud in their work and want to work harder for their boss. In the article on parenting and managing it says, “Managers play a big role in helping to make their employees feel empowered, confident and self-reliant by the positive feedback they provide.” (Crace). Employees become more confident in their work and their determination to do better. As a result, people do better work for others when they are praised and given promotions and
“Besides, this Duncan Hath borne his faculties so meek, hath been / So clear in his great office, that his virtues /Will plead like angels, trumpet-tongued, against / The deep damnation of his taking-off; (1.7.16-20)” The powerful values of being a good king in Macbeth, all the king's learn to manage throughout the book. William Shakespeare's ideas towards kingship can be seen throughout the play Macbeth, and shows that a king should be chosen by a divine right. Throughout the play Macbeth the most important topic is kingship. Followed by knowing the difference of kingship and tyranny. Shakespeare closed it out with cruelty and masculinity along with staying true to principles.
The rational part of the ruler is wise and therefore it should rule over the other parts of the mind. Socrates questions, “…isn’t it appropriate for the rational part to rule, since it is really wise and exercises foresight on behalf of the whole soul…(Plato 98).” In th...
In doing so the leader acknowledges that they cannot do things on their own, but the give a bit of praise to their co-workers, who by other circumstances would not even be spoken of. I think it is impressive who these types of leaders are successful. When I of how a leader is, I never imagine a leader as shy or quiet but instead loud and overly confident. I like the idea that a leader does not have to be outgoing but their ideas must exhibit confidence and
People may possess a multitude of skills and qualities that make them leaders but only a select few contribute to their success. These qualities help to distinguish them as leaders in their homes, committees and more. As a leader, one should always strive for their “team” to get better rather than just being good (Halverson). pushing them can be effective in helping them to get more done and improve their skills. A leader would not work his followers to the bone for they would tire out easily. this could end up decreasing productivity while people would look forward to working. By wanting to improve, a team can push through barriers as opposed to only trying to reach a certain level. Th...
In 2009 when Sergio Marchionne took over one of the Chrysler plants had around 200 workers and by the end of the summer over 4500 people were employed; at that location alone. During his 60 minute interview Mr. Marchionne gives a lot of acknowledgement to his employees crediting them for the successful turnaround in the company. This shows us that he is the type of leader who would motivate through the positive reinforcement theory because his positivity in the comments to his employees shows that he isn’t taking full credit for all the work that was done and the success that has happened. When Mr. Marchionne became CEO of Chrysler he moved his office down where the engineers work on the 4th floor. “No need for a top-floor penthouse, which sits empty where a chairman and three vice chairmen used to be, when a fourth floor office will suffice.” (Allpro.com). This was one of his first step in creating change of direction in a company which was used to being lead by leaders who didn’t fully engage with the employees. Another point to mention, and a result of his close contact with the engineer, is that the engineers were performing for him and were able to get a brand new car model designed and produced in less than a year; which proves his leadership style works. In order for a great leader to get this kind of effective cooperation from his employees shows his skills in leadership. By giving them positive reinforcement and being a motivational leader with high hopes with an optimistic vision for the future he was able to get them to perform and meet his standards and goals in a short allotted amount of time. This constrictive timeframe was strategic in reentering the automotive industry with a new product to boost sales and pro...
... that areas of expertise can be exploited, different people are good at different things. Groups can discuss material, and that discussion can improve the quality of the decision. Groups are less likely to suffer from judgmental biases that individuals have when they make decisions. People are more likely to follow through on decisions made by groups that they are connected to. Also, more monumental decisions can be made in groups, because one member will not be singled out for blame, making the entire group responsible.
...and show an open mind to everyone’s ideas. I’ve found that this makes for a lighter and more fun environment and we’ve shown success in completing our task. Most times I’m put into groups, I don’t know the other people very well. This is common at school with my classmates. I’m used to having no leader in the group and everyone fighting to have their ideas chosen. Once a leader was chosen in the group we started discussing openly everyone’s ideas with the chosen leader voicing their opinion on which idea to choose and why. Usually when it comes to my friends I take the leadership role and make an try to hear everyone’s opinion before making a decision. I believe that for a team to find success and reach their goal someone needs to take leadership and voice an unbiased opinion. The team needs to hear everyone’s ideas and choose one based on which will lead to success.
This paper is intended to explain where collaborative leadership is used, what characteristics it possesses, and the benefits and disadvantages of using it. It will also summarize what types of people are collaborative leaders and the qualities they have that make them one.
Particularly, two members within my group began to emerge as leaders due to their knowledge, skills, as well as experience working with our chosen population. Although I always view them as ‘experts’ in this topic, our group became less focused on our goals and more concerned about the ‘power struggle’ between our two leaders, before we could reach any consensus. Essentially, our group had two authoritarians butting heads and trying to take lead throughout the beginning of the group process. Thus, the other members or ‘followers’ contribution, like mine, seem to not matter unless they adhered to either leaders’ opinions without question. According to Stringer (2014), “Leadership… Is defined according to its function of facilitating organizational and operational processes, rather than defining and controlling them” (p. 31). The researcher further states that active participation is the key to encourage and motivate group members to invest their time and energy to shape the quality of the group's production. Therefore, our group needed to find ways for all members to have a chance to participate fully and apply their individual strengths, in order to enhance our group’s
- In my own experiences, I have been both a leader and a manager in my professional life and find that leading can be difficult. Inspiring others to get on the same page and work together toward the same goal has its own challenges. It is much easier to manage the actual tasks associated with the project or the goal than it is to get buy in from others to complete those tasks.
A leader sets the tone for those they supervise. Having a weak or ineffective leadership style turns what could be a productive organization into one that lacks direction, is chaotic, and fails to live up to its potential. Incompetent central leadership can also cause a power struggle amongst the other remaining team members. Groups seek leadership; when leaders fail to use their powers others will maneuver to use the power left in the void. This can lead to a power-struggle and backstabbing (Morgan, 2007).
The concept of leadership arises out of the need for cooperative action by human beings to achieve certain goals. Leadership seeks to identify and deploy the groups’ pooled resources to tackle problems in order to achieve set objectives. While human beings are independent and capable of individual action, there are many situations in real life that require dependence on one person or a small group of people who have a broad view of the intervening issues enabling them to direct the actions of the rest of the individuals. The degree of success from this effort is a measure of the leadership skill present within a team.
Focusing on what other people have to offer is one thing, but being able to actually encourage that and reward that is another. I should, as a leader, want to show support for my followers in any way possible, whether it is verbally or physically. If someone does a spectacular job on a project or meets a deadline, I could reward that behavior in some way. It could be an uplifting comment or even a free lunch. Whatever it is, it will more than likely be empowering to that person and make them want to keep doing stellar work. I could empower people by communicating more frequently and with better quality. Also, empowerment could come in handy when a not so great job is being done. If someone is slacking on the job, as a leader I could offer help and advice on how to improve and prevent the issue from arising in the
Many organization have structures level of leadership. The person in leadership transforms the employees by inspiring them to follow the vision set by the organization. How do great leaders do this? By the use of power and authority. Leaders influence other with use of power. Authority gives the leader the right exert this power. Both leadership and authority is linked to power but in order to operate effectively; the use of power must be understood.
Having an effective leadership approach in an organization supports a productive and successful business. In this case, an organization called Valena Scientific Corporation (VSC) failed to have effective leadership. VSC attempted to development leadership; but failed initially. This occurred once VSC decided to create a research program for their scientists; this program split nine individuals into three groups. Once the groups were split, management decided to allow informal leadership to occur. This style of leadership enables individuals to become leaders without having a position of power (Bacal, 2014). Therefore, every individual in each group has the same authority; but one person may be perceived by others as a leader (making them an informal leader). This type of leadership caused conflict between groups and communication to be lost.