Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Attribution Theory by George Kelly
Review of attribution theory
The Attribution Theory by George Kelly
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Attribution Theory by George Kelly
With reference to articles published within the last decade, critically evaluate the contribution to Social Psychology made by any one Attribution Theory
This paper will define and explain attributions based on Weiner’s (1974, 1985) theory of attribution, The literature surrounding Weiner’s (1974, 1985) model shall be examined, in particular, articles that focus on stigmatisation within society, and the usefulness of attributions in a sporting context, before finally exploring the universal applicability of attributions in different cultural societies.
An attribution refers to an individual’s perceived cause or causes of their own and others behaviour. We interpret other people’s actions and we predict what they will do under certain circumstances. Though these ideas are usually not formulated, they often function adequately (Heider, 1944). Attributions are common to everyday life, and individual and unique life experiences means that not everyone’s attributions are synonymous. Basic models of attribution were theorised as early as the 1940s (Heider, 1944; Heider and Simmel, 1944), with more recognised theories being introduced in the 1950s and 1960s (Heider, 1958; Jones and Davis, 1965; Kelley, 1967). Weiner (1974, 1985) extended these ideas, summarising his own theory of attribution and introducing a conception known as achievement motivation (Weiner, 1979).
Weiner’s (1974) attribution model initially included two dimensions; locus of cause and stability of cause. The locus of cause dimension refers to the determinant of the behaviour. The behaviour is either a result of internal, dispositional factors, or a result of external, situational factors. Internal factors include agents that are within our control, such as ...
... middle of paper ...
...al Learning Press.
Weiner, B. (1979). A Theory of Motivation for some Classroom Experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71. 3-25.
Weiner, B. (1985). Spontaneous Causal Thinking. Psychological bulletin, 97. 74-84.
Weiner, B. (1986). An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Wiese, H. J., Wilson, J. F., Jones, R. A., & Neises, M. (1992). Obesity Stigma Reduction in Medical Students. International Journal of Obesity, 16. 869-868.
Wiggins-James, N., James, R., & Thompson, G. (2006). A2 PE for AQA. Heinemann, Oxford.
Willner, P., & Smith, M. (2007). Attribution Theory Applied to Helping Behaviour Towards People with Intellectual Disabilities who Challenge. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21. 150-155.
Woods, B. (2001). Psychology in Practice: Sport. Hodder & Stoughton, Abingdon, Oxon.
Wang, S.‑K., & Han, S. (2001). Six c�s of motivation. In M. Orey (Ed.), Learning, teaching, & technology. Retrieved September 15, 2002, from University of Georgia, Dept. of Instructional Technology Web site: http://itstudio.coe.uga.edu/ebook/6csmotivation.htm
The self-serving bias is the tendency for an athlete to accommodate to factors that paint the athlete in a favorable light. In the athletic realm, individuals portray the self-serving bias to foster future, effective performance in a sport. Whereas an athlete will attribute positive events to the doing of themselves, an athlete will attribute negative events to the doing of others. Although an individual may be inaccurate when imputing a factor, the self-serving bias is a method by which an individual safeguards esteem. It is this protection of esteem that is paralleled in the attribution theory. For instance, an athlete uses the self-serving bias to attribute success as a byproduct of the team. On the other hand, the athlete uses the self-serving
Wann, D. L. & Schrader, M. P. (2000). Controllability and stability in the self-serving attributions of sport spectators. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 160-169.
Social cognitive theory states that behavior and personality is mostly influenced by the person, their thinking, and their social context. People often learn certain behaviors through conditioning and imitation of others, creating a personality that is strongly influenced by something other than their self. Bandura also emphasized that in social cognitive theory, we focus on how we interact with our surrounding environment, rather than how the environment controls us which is better known as reciprocal determinism. Julian Rotter also created a theory about how we have a generalized disposition to believe that our rewards based on past experiences comes from our internal and external locus of control, often referred to as attributional style. Internal meaning that you are in charge of your fate, which creates a self bias, causing you to feel as if you are better than you actually are. Whereas external locus, your rewards are determined by outside forces, leading to learned helplessness because there is nothing you can do to control your fate. Bill Cosby relied solely on his external locus of control, for he doesn’t attempt to prevent his harsh behavior from being seen. However, his behavior expresses the idea that Cosby exists in a world of self bias, and thinks that he is better than he actually is, causing him to attempt to shape the environment to like him in that ideal way. Bill Cosby also may see himself as controlling or out of control , rather than being controlled by the environment, which helps explain why he might of felt the need to take advantage of
Interest in the social aspects of obesity is nothing new. Jeffrey Sobal has written extensively about the social and psychological consequences of obesity , including the stigmatisation and discrimination of obese and even overweight individuals (Sobal 2004).
It is important for us humans to know that we must take full responsibility for our actions and maturely deal with any consequences that those actions may lead to. According to Ryon and Gleason (2013), “the first conceptualization of control was developed in 1966 by Rotter,” which is currently referred to as locus of control. Rotter defined locus of control as “the degree to which an individual expects that a contingent relationship exists between one’s behaviors and outcomes” (Ryon & Gleason, 2013). Fournier and Jeanrie reference Rotter’s study by explaining the two types of locus of control: “external control” and “internal control” (as cited in Rotter, 1966, p. 1). The purpose of Rotter’s theory was to examine “what causes reinforcement” whether it be an intrinsic or extrinsic factor (Kormanik & Rocco, 2009). Rotter measured “people’s general control expectancies” by using what is known as the “Internal-External Locus of Control Scale” (Fournier & Jeanrie, 2003).
Lyons, Christopher J. 2006. “Stigma or Sympathy? Attributions of Fault to Hate Crime Victims and Offenders.” American Sociological Association. 69:39-59
Sullivan, M. J., Tripp, D. A., & Catano, V. (1997). The contributions of attributional style, expectancies, depression and self-esteem in a cognition-based depression model. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29(2), 101. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/220514335?accountid=32521
The Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE) is a concept within social psychology that assumes when someone is aggressive, it is due to a flaw in their personality as opposed to a reaction to their personal circumstances (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2015). However, there is typically a situational reason for the other person’s behavior that is not taken into account through the FAE (Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2015). I have been guilty of making the FAE myself; for example, I can think of two situations where my frustration led me to believe that there were flaws in my antagonists’ characters. Recently, my mother wanted me to assist my brother in scheduling classes for the semester. Since I was annoyed that my mother was insisting that I assist him when
Keller, John M. (2006). What Are the Elements of Learner Motivation? Retrieved July 4, 2011
Attribution theory correlates with how people exemplify events and how it affects their behavior and thinking. People making casual explanations is known as attribution theory. It was established over time from different social psychologists, especially Fritz Heider who played a major role in producing the theory in 1958. Heider wrote about attribution theory in his book called The Psychology of Interpersonal Relationships. External attribution is when behavior is altered by influences outside of your control. Internal attribution is caused from an inside factor that falls within your control. Your behavior is not influenced and you feel responsible.
The attribution theory is essential to coaching and understanding our athletes and their motivations. Throughout sports and competitive activities, individuals are determining whether the activity they are doing is a success or a failure. But the real question that needs to be asked is why are they attributing something as a success or a failure. What is guiding them to view something that can be as simple as getting out of bed in the morning as a success or failure? This paper will dive into why the attribution theory is so critical to coaching and how you can use it to guide yourself, your players, and your teams to become as successful as possible.
a1.) “To be an agent is to influence intentionally one’s functioning and life circumstances. In this view, personal influence is part of the causal structure. People are self-organizing, proactive, self-regulating, and self-reflecting. They are not simply onlookers of their behavior. They are contributors to their life circumstances, not just products of them...Human functioning is a product of a reciprocal interplay of
How the Attribution Theory in an attempt to assign meaning/understanding to events on the basis of eith...
Attribution theory suggests that when we observe an individual's behavior, we attempt to determine whether it was internally or externally caused. That determination depends largely on three factors: distinctiveness, consensus, and consistency. Our perceptions of people differ from our perceptions of inanimate objects.