Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ancient greece and gender
Gender roles classic greece
Ancient greece and gender
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In order to support the patriarchal nature of Athenian society, every aspect of their society emphasized the power and significance of males. The oikos, or the household, was the basic foundation of the society with many oikoi coming together to form their polis, Athens. Each oikos consisted of a man, who was the head of that oikos, and everybody else that lived in his household, including his wife, children, and slaves. Since the society greatly stressed masculinity, this was also central to the oikos as well. Adultery’s threat to Athenian society is represented in Lysias’s speech, On the Murder of Eratosthenes. Adultery was seen as a social rather than a personal issue and a more atrocious crime than rape because it demasculinized men and …show more content…
The Greek word for adultery is moicheia, and the adulterous man is called the moichos (Carey, n.p). According to Euphiletos, moicheia was the “greatest of wrongs,” (Lysias, 45). This is an extreme issue in their society because it diminishes the power of the husband because he is her kurios, and failed protect her. Adultery was always considered to have been committed upon the woman because she is weak and unable to control her desires. However, moicheia was always done with her consent. In Xenophon’s Hieron, it is stated that adultery corrupts a woman’s affection to her husband, as she becomes attached to the other man both personally and sexually (Carey, n.p). Therefore, a key issue in adultery was interfering with the connection of the …show more content…
He says to Eratosthenes, “Your executioner is not I, but the law of the city, whose violation you thought less important than your pleasures. It was your choice to commit an offence like this against my wife and my children, rather than to obey the laws and behave properly,” (Lysias, 26). In this quote, Euphiletos expresses the threat adultery posed to society, and shows adultery in the light of a public offence, rather than a personal conflict simply within the oikos. Euphiletos later follows up this statement and takes it a step farther saying, “So then, gentlemen, not only do the laws acquit me of doing wrong, but they also require me to exact this punishment.” (Lysias, 34). Here Euphiletos directly states that he was mandated by law to carry out the murder of Eratosthenes. However, the law clearly states that the husband is permitted impunity for murder in this case, not that the husband is by any means obligated to complete this
Some of these are brought out in different situations, both positive and negative, such as Menaleus's mention of his father, which caused a sudden out-burst of tears, and the proud and accomplished feeling he received from leaving Sparta.. Odysseus's situation was only slightly different. He, like Telemachos had his worries about family-life, and his kingdom at stake, but also had concerns about his wife, possibly triggered by the mention of Agamemnon's by Proteus, who was killed by the hands of his own wife.
McKeating, Henry. “Sanctions Against Adultery in Ancient Israelite Society with Some Reflection on Methodology in the Study of Old Testament Ethics.” Journal for the Study of the OldTestament. Vol. XVII (Mar. 1979).
Recently in my class, we have been discussing different civilizations and how women were treated during that time. While reading the books, I was able to read things and relate them to notes that I had recently taken. Something in particular that I found that correlated was in chapter four of the book. This chapter talked about women’s role in Athens, which was motherhood. We had just talked about this in class, and how men were able to divorce women with no public humiliation, if the wife was not able to conceive a
As stated earlier, most women in Athens in the fifth century were excluded from most parts of public life. They were not allowed to take part in most political events. The Athenian women had one exception in which they were allowed to partake in public events: the several different state religion festivals. Otherwise, women were kept out of public events. When at home or in private events, the women were usually being watched and under control of the men. Women did not have much say in their own life. Marriages were arranged, and the woman was usually still young when this was done. Women could get a divorce, though, but with several regulations. A woman’s chief purpose was to provide a male son who would serve as the heir to the family and carry on the family name. According to The Western Heritage, “Respectable women stayed home to raise the children, cook, weave cloth, and oversee the management of the household …. Athenian women were expected to remain at home out of sight, quiet, and unnoticed.” Pericles himself told several women, “...the greatest glory of women is to be least talked about by men, whether for good o...
Thompson, James C. "Marriage in Ancient Athens." Womenintheancientworld.com. N.p., July 2010. Web. 29 Apr. 2014. .
She places in people the desire to have sexual relations and causes fear in men of the power of seduction by women. Her marriage to her husband was ignored as she had affairs with immortal and mortal men. Her infidelity in her marriage places her on the side with Greek men, rather than Greek women because only Greek men were able to cheat on their wives; not the other way around. In conclusion, the three important rules discussed in this paper that Greek women were required to obey, can be seen in the myths of the goddesses Hera, Athena, and Aphrodite. Whether or not the Greek goddesses obeyed or did not obey these rules, their importance to the Greek culture is ever strong.
When it comes to adultery, love is the most important factor in determining if it’s wrong or right. In Plato’s Symposium, love is discussed among Phaedrus, Pausanias, Eryximachus, Aristophanes Agathon and Socrates. Pausanias is the most important when discussing adultery. Pausanias points out that there are two types of love, Common Aphrodite’s Love and Love of Heavenly Aphrodite. Common love is the root of adultery. It is the love that has plagued the whole world for the past hundreds of years. It is the love shared between two people only for their selfish sexual pleasures. While Heavenly love is the spiritual love between an elder and a boy that provides guidance, and I believe it is the cure for the devastating plague of common love. Most people share common love and have no real soulful love connection between them. In the Symposium, Pausanias refers to a love he calls the common love in which a person is more attached “to the body more than the soul, and to the least intelligent partners, since all they care about is completing the sexual act” (166). Which relates to adultery in that committing sexual acts with someone else’s body is ultimately meaningless if the person is not attached to the soul of the other person. I claim that adultery is morally permissible because having sexual intercores with someone else has little
Adulterous women, on the other hand, had undeniably smaller punishments for adultery because of the way in which the Athenians view sex and sexuality. Women were always seen as weak, while the men were strong and penetrative. Therefore, adultery was seen as an act that was done against them, despite the fact that it was done with their approval and involvement. However, the women still faced certain sanctions. Their husband was legally required to divorce his wife if it was discovered that she had an affair (Carey, n.p). It was believed that women that participated in an adulterous affair once were more likely to betray their husband again, so they had to end the marriage. In addition, adulterous women were banned from public temples and from wearing jewelry. If found violating this ban, they could be beaten (Robson, 98). Since moicheia included any affair between a woman
Odysseus ' principles and characteristics are a prototype of an ideal Homeric Greek leader. Odysseus is noble, clever and loyal. Through his distress and blunders, he gains knowledge that was not only crucial for his survival but for his companions too. Odysseus’s cleverness constantly allowed him to avoid death because he relied on trickery, rhetoric and disguise. “The society depicted in The Odyssey is one where male values were dominant and where all socially relevant transactions took place between the male members of the community”. (Whittaker 39) While males’ dominance takes the forefront in society, their principles are continuously being challenged by the allurement of women. In The Odyssey, many instances of such seduction reveals
In “Aeschines: Against Timarchus” Aeschines, using only indirect language, convincingly argues that Timarchus, being a citizen male who is active in public political life, has committed hubris acts upon himself through his sexual promiscuity with various men. In ancient Greek society, to talk candidly about male same sex acts was considered indecorous, and it would offend the members of the court if Aeschines spoke explicitly. For this reason, the language Aeschines uses when describing the sexual acts committed by Timarchus is at once discrete and poignant. While avoiding transparency in his descriptions, Aeschines nonetheless leads the jury to a resolute conclusion regarding the exact nature of Timarchus’ past sexual experiences with men.
“Lysistrata” is a tale which is centered around an Athenian woman named Lysistrata and her comrades who have taken control of the Acropolis in Athens. Lysistrata explains to the old men how the women have seized the Acropolis to keep men from using the money to make war and to keep dishonest officials from stealing the money. The opening scene of “Lysistrata” enacts the stereotypical and traditional characterization of women in Greece and also distances Lysistrata from this overused expression, housewife character. The audience is met with a woman, Lysistrata, who is furious with the other women from her country because they have not come to discuss war with her. The basic premise of the play is, Lysistrata coming up with a plan to put an end to the Peloponnesian War which is currently being fought by the men. After rounding up the women, she encourages them to withhold sex until the men agree to stop fighting. The women are difficult to convince, although eventually they agree to the plan. Lysistrata also tells the women if they are beaten, they may give in, since sex which results from violence will not please the men. Finally, all the women join Lysistrata in taking an oath to withhold sex from their mates. As a result of the women refraining from pleasing their husbands until they stop fighting the war, the play revolves around a battle of the sexes. The battle between the women and men is the literal conflict of the play. The war being fought between the men is a figurative used to lure the reader to the actual conflict of the play which is the battle between men and women.
Athenians believed that the work load for each individual had been divided from the beginning and both men and women serve their own objective. Since each of the members knew what was expected of them, there would be no confusion on what work was reversed for men and what was reserved for the women. Any Athenian should not go against their nature (as either a man or women), in terms of their work and also fully commit to their daily duties and responsibilities. Men knew that women were capable of attending to the work of the private sphere, which also meant men’s presence was no required. The work of the private sphere was considered to be of most importance since it was regarding the oikos, and it was in not considered trivial. Women had to cook, make cloths, watch over slaves, and see to the goods/items that were coming in or going out; likewise, all of these tasks kept the oikos well-rounded. With the women having a secure handling over the functions of the oikos, that allowed the men to go out to the public sphere and continue with their end of the
However in Lysistrata the women needed to get involved to resolve the war between the Spartans and the Athenians. This was a huge red flag for the audience in Athens because of the Athenian attitude towards women. Treated as almost a second class citizen to men, the women in Lysistrata took an active role in persuading the men of Athens to find peace with the Spartans by way of abstinence. Particularly Lysistrata got a group of women together that disliked the current suffering caused by the war and convinced them to not sleep with their husbands until they decided to work towards peace.”...imagine. We’re at home, beautifully made up, and we walk around the house wearing sheer lawn shifts… and we keep our distance … they’ll make peace soon enough”(p.146). Using their sexuality as a weapon towards the men in Lysistrata the women effectively forced the men to change their political attitudes. This further proved to undermine the democracy by showing the audience that even the women noticed that the current system was causing problems and it needed to be changed. So much so that women were willing to make their husbands suffer until an agreeable result was achieved. Once an agreement was achieved between both sides the Spartans and Athenians drank together and celebrated their new found peace. This gave the audience another taste of what it would have been like if the war was over. Using the contrast
Oedipus, ruler of Thebes, murdered his father and married his mother. Such acts are almost always deemed unnatural and criminal; they are not tolerated within traditional society. A person who has committed these acts of murder and incest would be considered an outcast, yet Sophocles’s character, Oedipus, is not guilty of either.
Women served two separate and distinct purposes, neither condoned in the same woman. One purpose was matrimony and procreation, the other was sexual pleasure for pleasure’s sake (Freeman, 228-229). The Greeks had several beliefs