Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is knowledge important
The importance of knowledge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why is knowledge important
Art Theft by Charlene Piccio
Art theft has become an increasingly recognized crime in the world. It’s a hot object for robbers to steal, and makes tons of money in the black market. Government agencies attempt to stop these crimes, yet as the years go by, more and more art is lost that’s worth millions. Art now has to be protected in order to be preserved and not stolen. With the help of art crime teams, past cases, and why art has become a major source of criminal activity, we can discover how the art world has become what it is today.
Throughout the world, people work together in order to stop art thefts, and prevent them from happening again. The United States Federal Bureau Investigation, or the FBI, enlists an Art Crime Team to deal
…show more content…
with these robberies. This unit is comprised of 16 special agents who all work together with attorneys from the DOJ trial in order to carry out prosecutions for people who have stolen art (“Art Crime Team”).
The FBI has also made the National Stolen Art File, an online database for art that was reported stolen, as well as cultural properties for agencies to be have handy for use. In Los Angeles, the Art Theft Team that works there created a specific crime unit called the Art Theft Detail. In this designated area, only fine art was looked into if it was the subject of a robbery. The two detectives who work on the case will “target suspects preying upon artists, art dealers, and collectors” (“About the Art Theft Detail”). The Los Angeles Art Theft Team also provides a section on their website where you can determine whether a piece of art is fake, or authentic. Interpol also has their hand in dealing with the art theft world. Since acknowledging the importance of their role in inquiring about shady trade deals, they encourage other professions in the similar field, like the dealers …show more content…
and owners, to help out with theft and potentially solve some crimes (“Works of Art”). Like the FBI, they too have a database of work that has been stolen. These databases, however, don’t compare to the Art Loss Register. The Art Loss Register is considered the largest database of artwork stolen in the entire world. Working together with the art community, they provide research services in order to “minimize the risk of handling stolen, fake, or missing art” (“Art Dealers”). All four of these organizations provide a means to stop art theft. One art theft case that came to be involved the painting “Conversation with the Gardener,” by Pierre-Auguste Renoir. During late 2000 in Stockholm, Sweden, an unarmed guard was held at gunpoint at the National Museum. While the guard was being held up, two accomplices of the armed man entered the museum and stole a few works of art, including “Conversation with the Gardener.” To get away, they left spikes on the ground to slow down the police, and set off a few car explosions to distract them as well (“Conversation with the Gardener”). The robbers were able to get away on a water boat. Although receiving a ransom, the police declined the offer, and were able to arrest eight men by January. “Conversation with the Gardener” was not recovered until five years later in 2005. It was discovered while on an “undercover drug raid” (“Conversation with the Gardener”). As for the other works that were stolen that night, they have not been found as of yet. To me, art theft is such a costly criminal enterprise because depending on the robber, they either will eventually destroy it, or sell it off for millions.
Robbers who know little about the artwork that they have stolen can potentially ruin it with the wear-and-tear that goes through transportation and trading. With the art being worn down, it will eventually deteriorate and not be the same as it was secured in a museum. On the other hand, robbers who study and watch the art business, as well as the crimes committed, know how to handle art carefully. When stolen, thieves will wait until the robbery has been announced in the newspaper, so they can see the work’s value. Once seen, then they’ll be able to calculate how much they will earn in profits, or how much it would go for on the black market (“Art Theft Ranked as Fourth-Largest Criminal Enterprise”). Art is so valued today because it reminds us of a simpler time, of where the artist could express themselves freely. When looking at the art, it evokes emotions that we may have not known before, and to own and cherish it in your own time can be an amazing experience. Art reveals a lot of what we don’t know about
ourselves. In conclusion, art theft is still a problem that is fought today. We attempt to prevent it by hiring teams designed to track down potential suspects. We look at past cases in order to find patterns of how future robberies could be executed. We also question the value of art in order to figure out why these people steal. Even though art theft is still to be dealt with, we will eventually find a way to curb this situation so that art can again be appreciated in the way that it’s supposed to be.
Often art is lost or destroyed through out the many dangers of time. Art is sometimes used to convey thoughts or ideas of a time or people. If works are lost or destroyed we may lose important information from this time or the people who created the art. This matter is shown best in the movie titled The Rape of Europa.
What does the work consist of? Who authored it, and how? What is it based on, and how does it relate? What is it, and what will become of it? The answers to these questions, collectively, form an important response to a bigger question: What is art? What does it mean to describe a piece as “a work of art”?
Many works of art can be considered artifacts that hold volumes of information regarding the culture of the people that created them and the historical context in which they lived.
"The Disappointed Art Lover." writ. Francis Sparshott. The Forger's Art. gen. ed. Denis Dutton. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
Smug faces, military uniforms, a strange marking, an open window and a shopping cart full of ill gotten goods; those are the objects that can be seen in the Banksy Street art found on a damaged building in New Orleans, Louisiana.
Art is a very important part of humanity’s history, and it can be found anywhere from the walls of caves to the halls of museums. The artists that created these works of art were influenced by a multitude of factors including personal issues, politics, and other art movements. Frida Kahlo and Vincent van Gogh, two wildly popular artists, have left behind artwork, that to this day, influences and fascinates people around the world. Their painting styles and personal lives are vastly different, but both artists managed to capture the emotions that they were feeling and used them to create artwork.
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
The article Artists Mythologies and Media Genius, Madness and Art History (1980) by Griselda Pollock is a forty page essay where Pollock (1980), argues and explains her views on the crucial question, "how art history works" (Pollock, 1980, p.57). She emphasizes that there should be changes to the practice of art history and uses Van Gogh as a major example in her study. Her thesis is to prove that the meaning behind artworks should not be restricted only to the artist who creates it, but also to realize what kind of economical, financial, social situation the artist may have been in to influence the subject that is used. (Pollock, 1980, pg. 57) She explains her views through this thesis and further develops this idea by engaging in scholarly debates with art historians and researcher, and objecting to how they claim there is a general state of how art is read. She structures her paragraphs in ways that allows her to present different kinds of evidences from a variety sources while using a formal yet persuasive tone of voice to get her point across to the reader.
Walter Benjamin emphasizes in his essay, “The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility” that technology used to make an artwork has changed the way it was received, and its “aura”. Aura represents the originality and authenticity of a work of art that has not been reproduced. The Sistine Chapel in the Vatican is an example of a work that has been and truly a beacon of art. It has brought a benefit and enlightenment to the art of painting, and it has an exemplary aura that cannot be replaced. A picture taken of the Sistine Chapel is just an imaged “captured”, while the painting is still original, because it is not movable, and its cult value is still intact. He asserts that the origin of an artwork gave its aura and authenticity and since it is not moveable, it does not have the ability to be reproduced by other artists. Therefore, the aura and authenticity is autocratic. For instance, the Sistine Chapel is owned and controlled by the Vatican—Catholic Cardinals. They control its usage to the masses. Once art becomes available to the masses, it becomes in a way ‘successful.’ In addition, he calls to attention that the forces of commercialization have subjected the aura of an artwork to cheapening cult value, which is a positive outcome for the masses.
In education today, art studies are not often viewed as a priority for students and they very frequently get cut from school’s curriculum due to a lack of proper funding. Howeve...
"You can wipe out an entire generation, you burn their homes to the ground and somehow they will still find their way back. But if you destroy their history, you destroy their achievements and it as if they never existed"(Cambell,2014). During World War II the Nazis would go through the countries they occupied. The art they took was either put in their own museums or they burned them. The Nazis stole millions of pieces of art, mostly pieces that were made from the end of the of the 18th century up until the 1900 's. Hitler ordered his soldiers to steal the art to gain power over other cultures. At the end of the war, the Allies were on a hunt to find all the missing and stolen art the Nazis hid at the end of the war. The big debate today is if the stolen art should go back to their rightful owners. Over a span of six years, the Nazis stole millions of paintings the trails to get those back to their rightful owners has had a lasting impression on today 's world.
Graffiti is a beautiful art that expresses feeling and emotions. However, people think of it differently. Is it a crime or an art? Those talented people, young or old, a teenage, a child or an adult, have a passion for making graffiti art on street walls a...
The subject of art conservation and restoration has long been debated in the art world. Experts and historians have never agreed that all art must be salvaged at any cost. This paper will examine what art conservation and restoration is, what is involved in these endeavors, and what has been done over the centuries to many of history’s cherished art pieces.
It is a ridiculous belief that just because graffiti is done somewhere without consent, it throws out the notion that it is still art. Sure, the piece of work was done illegally but why can’t the work still be appreciated and enjoyed. Art is art wherever it is found. The location of the piece does not change that. In fact, graffiti can kill two birds with one stone. First, at the foundation it is a form of art. Second, on top of that foundation a message can be erected and directed. But as the saying goes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Unlike any other markets, the art market is extremely diverse and opaque. In most cases, buyers tend to hide themselves behind the curtains (especially during important auction events or art fairs), which make it hard to get access to the accurate information (art pieces ownerships, collection ownerships and price history). As a result, the more information you have from the inside market, the more chances you gain art bus...