Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is art a form of communication
The influence of art
The influence of art
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The arts, are a window to the past they allow our current society to understand the thoughts and visions of previous artists and their movements. It is through the idealization of the form or the use of expressive and chaotic brush stokes that we are able to understand the purpose of a piece and acknowledge the metamorphosis art has undergone over the course of time. Both the visual and preforming arts serve as a vehicle of communication, we see how artists use powerful images express some of the most complex thoughts, opinions, and human emotions. It can be said, that art is a source of cultural enlightenment that allows us to understand the values and views of a certain region or group without having a firsthand experience. Art has been used in many different manners, “the glorification of religion, propaganda, symbolism, and” as a reflection of societies flaws and virtues. Humankind is not able to survive without basic resources such as food, water, and shelter; and it certainly cannot exist without art. From the very beginning of mankind humans have craved and indulged in any fo...
What is ‘Art’? Does the term describe a tangible object, experiential event, process, technique, medium, or creative skill? Does it imply attractive decoration, pleasant arrangement, and sound financial investment - or can art provoke, be unattractive, make people uncomfortable, and be fleeting? Today, Art is subjective, open to interpretation and encompasses the spectrum of the visual, literary, dance, and musical humanities - often overlapping one another. As such, Art and its practice can be all of the above and more. Post World War II, Modernist theories were waning and a general dissatisfaction was building in the United States and other westernized countries that ultimately led up to the cultural and social revolution of the 1960’s. The period also parallels a rise in relative wealth and subsequent mass consumption of commodities, education, and cultural activities within all the socioeconomic classes. Personal expression became acceptable and art practice exploded to include multiple fields of activity that Rosalind Krauss likens to “an extraordinary practice in elasticity”. Interest in ecology, performance, process, alternative materials, a loosening of social mores and experimentation with altered states of reality contributed to the rise of what is now known amply as Postmodernism. Civil rights, the anti-war movement, rise of feminism, and a political movement left of center created egalitarian entrances for many into various fields of study including Art. Nevertheless, similar to the current state of Western Civilization, not everyone appreciates an open multiplicity of voices often differing in viewpoints from safer, more conservative ones. It is in this context that artists Robert Smithson and Richard Serra bega...
Imagine pondering into a reconstruction of reality through only the visual sense. Without tasting, smelling, touching, or hearing, it may be hard to find oneself in an alternate universe through a piece of art work, which was the artist’s intended purpose. The eyes serve a much higher purpose than to view an object, the absorptions of electromagnetic waves allows for one to endeavor on a journey and enter a world of no limitation. During the 15th century, specifically the Early Renaissance, Flemish altarpieces swept Europe with their strong attention to details. Works of altarpieces were able to encompass significant details that the audience may typically only pay a cursory glance. The size of altarpieces was its most obvious feat but also its most important. Artists, such as Jan van Eyck, Melchior Broederlam, and Robert Campin, contributed to the vast growth of the Early Renaissance by enhancing visual effects with the use of pious symbols. Jan van Eyck embodied the “rebirth” later labeled as the Renaissance by employing his method of oils at such a level that he was once credited for being the inventor of oil painting. Although van Eyck, Broederlam, and Campin each contributed to the rise of the Early Renaissance, van Eyck’s altarpiece Adoration of the Mystic Lamb epitomized the artworks produced during this time period by vividly incorporating symbols to reconstruct the teachings of Christianity.
One of the first sources I examined was a web site on Pop Art. The
Art leads itself away from truth by being thrice removed from the truth, providing immoral guidelines and suggestions for individuals and depicting the God’s in a negative light. These implications can have a disastrous effect on society and lead to the moral injustice of an ideal state if such art is introduced into the state. In contrast, there exists art that may be allowed into the ideal state if such art teaches and positively affects the moral compass of citizens and leads to rational thought and suggestions. Lastly, art can only lead to a just society if it leads to exponential rational processes in an individual’s soul and must be kept out of the ideal state if the art imitates or attempts to only affect the emotional side of an individual’s
A few scholars theorize that art, as well as story-telling, should consider a versatile capacity for the human species, that they should fill a profound human need (cite). The first fundamental concept is there is the narrow border between art/literature and entertainment. The entertainment is usually a short-lived concept that focuses on short time-scales such as a week or a year. Entertainment such as comedy is mainly targeted to help people to forget their troubles for some time. However, art has a different concept. Anything that claims as art should have, the more permanent timeline. Art/literature can remain for centuries in which connect the generation to each other. Art has more meaningful and profound topics rather than entertainment.
We encounter art everyday. Art is paintings and sculptures, music and dance, film and photography. It is also fashion designing and architecture, novels and magazines. These seemingly different things have one thing in common – they are all ways in which humans convey themselves. For thousands of years, humans have used symbols to tell a story or describe a struggle. Art is the use of these symbols, symbols that represent us in some distinct way.
Since the dawn of time, man has been inspired by the beauty of art. The Macquarie Concise Dictionary describes art as “the production or expression of what is beautiful, appealing or of more than ordinary significance”. I interpret the word art to refer to the physical reproduction of the artists own perception of the world around them.
In, “Art History and the Politics of Empire,” Matthew Rampley argues that the prevailing narrative surrounding the influence of the Vienna School on the discipline of art history, has been one that links the genesis of the school to the creation of the “Austrian Historical Research” in 1854; an event which, according to proponents of this narrative, would spur the first generation of Viennese scholars like Rudolf von Eitelberger, and Moritz Thausing . In this mythos, the intrinsic value of the Vienna School lays in its agitation for a paradigmatic shift in the discipline, moving from questions of aesthetic and taste, to an art historical analysis that relied almost exclusively on historiographic sources. However, Rampley challenges this understanding of the Vienna School’s impact, instead proposing that one should consider how the context in which the scholarship of the Vienna School was derived directly impacted the knowledge it produced . For Rampley, works such as Riegl’s Late Roman Art
For over two thousand years, various philosophers have questioned the influence of art in our society. They have used abstract reasoning, human emotions, and logic to go beyond this world in the search for answers about arts' existence. For philosophers, art was not viewed for its own beauty, but rather for the question of how art and artists can help make our society more stable for the next generation. Plato, a Greek philosopher who lived during 420-348 B.C. in Athens, and Aristotle, Plato’s student who argued against his beliefs, have no exceptions to the steps they had to take in order to understand the purpose of art and artists. Though these two philosophers made marvelous discoveries about the existence of art, artists, and aesthetic experience, Plato has made his works more controversial than Aristotle.
Modern art runs a very important role in man’s life throughout history, because it that does not only give us inspiration but also the freedom to express ourselves through the use of different mediums.
Art is a part of our daily life and is present in numerous cultures across the world. It can affect our mood in a positive or disturbing way. Art provides us with a broad understanding of self-awareness and emotions. It allows us to express our imagination and human creative skills. Art grants us a distinct insight into our history. Pablo Picasso is one of the most profound artist of the twentieth century, but was deeply rooted in the art of the past. Guernica is powerful because of color and lighting, symbolism, and use of line.
This inspiration can revolutionize the definition of art and challenges the boundaries of society, imagination, and rules. To explain, this role allows for future generations of artists to constantly evolve and reform the practice of art, which also influences and compels society, contemporary life and the world at large. Additionally, this changing of art forms represents and keeps the evolving society in touch with it, leaving a legacy on future generations about the art practices from the past. In fact, students and other people studying art forms from the past or looking at these art forms in a museum or exhibition are inspired and can pioneer innovative and imaginative art forms that can possibly epitomize their feelings and thoughts associated with contemporary life and society as a whole. This could potentially mean breaking the norms of society and break the confines of what is accepted as art and create compelling art forms which can forever transform the definition of art.
I believe that World War One was the final nail in the coffin not only for Art Nouveau but also some other styles of art and literature during this time. World War One, also known as the Great War during 1914 till 1918 tilted culture on its side, particularly in Europe and the United States. In these four years alone nearly 9 million people died and millions more were maimed or psychologically scarred especially in Europe where most of the fighting took place (7). World War I is considered by some to be the first man-made catastrophe of the twentieth century and was caused by growing tensions between the European countries because of militarism, alliances, imperialism, and fierce nationalism. Obviously the beautiful, flowery Art Nouveau style
Culture is is what characterizes a society and gives them an identity. Art is an essential part of the cultural history of any person. An artist through a work can create awareness and reproducing it will reach everywhere to have the desired effect. Spreading the art on forms such as photography, forms like advertising that are on television, magazines, and other media gives to the art opportunity to reach the viewer eyes and deliver the message. These media represents a new way to learn about art, and its dissemination without losing its originality. Therefore, the time and space is the only that the art lost at the moment of it reproduction.
“Every age projects its own image into its art”. This means that the emotions and politics that Europe experience is then demonstrated through the art style of the time. It is important to study art from the past because art portrays the emotions and events of an era. Art allows people to analyze how the people felt throughout history. Art also shows the development of society, we see the styles of art change with the time periods. In art, we see changes in religious influences, religion became less of an important factor, and styles such as neoclassicism and romanticism became more popular. From the French Revolution to the French Revolutions of 1848 the viewer sees the emotion of the time through the art.