Arguments For Graphic Designers

Whenever people think about graphic designers, the first thing that comes to mind is fine drawings. However, there is a question often asked even within the field of Graphic Design. That is, “Is it important for a Graphic Designer to know how to draw, or not?”, is a controversial question. Some people think that a Graphic Designer must know how to draw in order to translate their thoughts onto paper. Whereas, other people think that software and different media make drawing less crucial to designers. A graphic designer's job is to communicate a message using visual media.

The argument for drawing ability is that being able to draw is key to being a successful Graphic Designer, since drawing is the fundamental to visual communication. Throughout

The research by Stone and Cassidy suggests that this could be caused by an over dependence on design software and technology. For this reason, the argument is that it is necessary for graphic designers to know how to draw, and draw well.

The other side of the argument is that modern software and technology make drawing less critical to Graphic Designers. The argument is that design software now is so advanced that the ability to draw has been take over in its importance by the ability to use design software. Software nowadays has extremely powerful uses such as; converting photographs into different line drawings, creating stretching points within an image that allows the user to transform the lines any way they want by clicking and dragging

Lead-in phrase or paraphrase.

. For these reasons some people believe that drawing ability has become less critical. And “(Research on students who use design software) suggested that the computer may be useful in the process of reinterpretation through its ability to provide rapid transformations.”

(445

Lead-in phrase or