Arguments Against Humanitarian Intervention

1048 Words3 Pages

“Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.” Why does this man not know how to fish? What does he need in order to learn? Why does the analogy assume that the person telling it knows how to fish the correct way? The old adage about giving a man a fish becomes increasingly complex in the Geopolitical world that we live in now. Humanitarian intervention is just that, giving people fish rather than creating lasting infrastructure that teaches them how to fish. The saying falls flat in one area in particular, it assumes that person does not know how to fish, and also doesn’t have the ability to learn. Humanitarian aid makes the same assumption that countries are unable to create their own …show more content…

It is harmful if it is within state actors, because state actors rarely act unbiasedly. States exist for the sole purpose of their own promotion and empowerment, so they are not equipped to intervene on behalf of someone else’s empowerment. Humanitarian aid is also done through the private sector with religious and service projects. However, humanitarian intervention on the state level is able to be regulated in ways that the private sector intervention simply cannot be. It is also important to note that most intervention is financial in nature. Humanitarian intervention is based on the premise that one country should give something to …show more content…

Through humanitarian intervention, foreign governments rely on other governments as a crutch, and the Institutional problems of infrastructure never truly get addressed. A system of bad government and poor institutions is perpetuated by this aid. The international community relies on the strength of each nation for world stability. If there is a decrease in political infrastructure in any one nation that will lead to a decrease of stability in the world at large. Every nation that gives aid is motivated by perpetuating their own believes. For example, if the US gives money to build schools in another country they will be funding schools that operate under western ideals. Humanitarian intervention at it’s worse is disguised colonialism. Giving aid to underdeveloped countries overshadows the local ideas and beliefs that are held within those countries. Such intervention assumes that the ones giving the aid are right, and everyone else is wrong. On an international level colonization decreases culture, and increases hegemony of the world

Open Document