Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of foreign aid
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of foreign aid
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of foreign aid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What Foreign Aid Is
There are two words that many politicians like to shy away from, and those
two words are, "foreign aid." Taking a firm stand on either side of this topic
is usually side stepped by decision makers. Their opinions are usually based
on a case by case analysis. This extremely controversial topic involves whether
or not to support the policy of foreign aid to needy or sometimes not so needy
countries. What benefits does foreign aid have for the countries that receive
it, and does it have any benefits for the countries who give? Some may say that
instead of spending money on foreign aid, money should be spent on domestic aid.
Those who argue in favor of foreign aid say that it is an investment in the
future of both countries that will eventually pay off. There is also another
factor to consider when discussing foreign aid: what kind of foreign aid is
being offered. There are three different types of foreign aid: first, there is
military foreign aid; second, there is foreign aid for the advancement
of business; third, there is emergency foreign aid for food and medicine.
Foreign aid to countries can help in many ways. It can be used as a
tool in bargaining. For instance a country that has just received foreign aid
or is expecting to get their regular installment of foreign aid will be more
likely to listen to new ideas. Because some countries are so dependent on their
regular installments of foreign aid, they are willing to appease countries such
as the U.S who are giving it. When looked at closely, foreign aid may be
considered an elaborate system of legal bribery. This becomes evident when
countries do what they would normally not consider doing in order to continue
receiving foreign aid. The U.S supplies financial foreign aid to many different
countries; sometimes this foreign aid is in a form of a loan. For example,
recently the U.S. supplied Mexico with a loan in order to save the falling value
of the Peso. This loan was denigrated by much of the U.S. population because
many people don't understand why the U.S. should care about the falling value of
the Mexican Peso. First of all, deflation of the Peso means a loss of jobs in
Mexico which would in turn send an influx of illeagal immigrants from Mexico to
the United States. In addition, Mexico is a large economy that imports
American goods. If the P...
... middle of paper ...
...the relief workers and to distribute the goods. Soon
it seemed that the US was not wanted in Somalia, and it seemed as if they were
biting the hand that feeds them. With such negative feelings about the US
troops staying in Somalia, an ethical decision had to be made. Do we help
these starving people, or do we leave to protect ourselves. Somalia was
supposed to be a strictly humanitarian effort, but it turned out to be a
military effort when the US had to fight against all sides.
When every aspect of foreign aid is looked at, a decision about who is
right or wrong by each individual on their own. Foreign aid is most likely a
necessary evil for a superpower such as the United States. The US, just because
of the sheer size and strength of its economy and military might has to watch
over the rest of the world in order to keep balance and peace around the world.
When considered, it turns out to be that all the foreign aid combined is such a
small percentage of the United States GDP that we really have little to complain
about. I believe that foreign aid is blown out of proportion by the media. It
is hot topic that generates controversy and kicks up the ratings.
Good Afternoon ladies, gentlemen and honorable judge Elliot. Today I am here to prove that Ms. Pearson is guilty of bullying and causing emotional distress to my client Alex Billings. Ms. Pearson and my client were both enrolled at King High School and met each other at freshman orientation. Upon attending this orientation a quick friendship had begun between Ms. Billings and Ms. Pearson. There at orientation they exchanged phone numbers and even MyFace account names. They were both assigned to the same English class together and even ate lunch together in the cafeteria. That weekend after school had started, Alex and Ms. Pearson met up at Go-Go’s. Ever since that weekend at Go-Go’s Ms. Pearson had constantly
The United States continues to give around $550 billion in aid to other countries each year, making America the world's top donor by far (Richardson). While the United States government only supplies $252 billion to needy Americans each year. Former Assistant to the President for Communications, Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous" (Foreign Aid). The United States need to give money to support the domestic impoverished rather than supporting developing foreign countries because the poverty and homelessness in America is increasing faster than the aid necessary to reduce this trend. Part of the reason that the United States should aid the domestic impoverished is that some foreign countries cannot be trusted with the money given to them and in certain cases, the money intended to aid countries are harmful for that country’s well-being.
As seen from Gettleman´s text, “But Awil is not a rebel. He is working for Somalia's government. The U.S. and other Western nations support the fragile Somali regime, which is battling an Islamic insurgency, as part of the counterterrorism strategy for the region.” As apparent, the United States has put a counterterrorism strategy into place, to help bring down the power that Somalia
In August of 1992, President George Bush Sr. sent US soldiers into Somalia to provide humanitarian relief to those Somalis suffering from starvation. The major problems in Somalia started when President Mohammed Siad Barre was overthrown by a coalition of opposing clans. Although there were several opposing groups, the prominent one was led by Mohammed Farah Aidid. Following the overthrow of Barre, a massive power struggle ensued. These small scale civil wars led to the destruction of the agriculture in Somalia, which in turn led to the deprivation of food in large parts of the country. When the international community heard of this, large quantities of food were sent to ease Somali suffering. However, clan leaders like Aidid routinely hijacked food and exchanged it for weapons leaving thousands to starve to death. An estimated 300,000 Somalis died between 1991 and 1992 (Clancy 234-236). US soldiers were later sent into Somalia to capture Aidid, but when the operation got bloody, displeasing the American public, Clinton withdrew troops (Battersby 151). In The Morality of War, Brian Orend outlines ethical guidelines that should be followed in all three stages of war: jus ad bellum, jus in bello, and jus post bellum. Orend states that a nation can be moral going into war, but immoral coming out of one. Did the US act justly in all facets of the Somali conflict? The United States espoused all the guiding principles of jus ad bellum but right intent, upheld the principals of jus in bello, and clearly failed to uphold several aspects of jus post bellum during the armed humanitarian intervention in Somalia.
Before extending aid to other countries, we should focus on our more prevalent domestic problems. Patrick Buchanan said, "The idea that we should send endless streams of tax dollars all over the world, while our own country sinks slowly in an ocean of debt is, well, ludicrous. Almost every American knows it, feels it, believes it." The topic of United States foreign policy is greatly debated, and a decision on how to handle is very hard to come by. It seems as if we are finally leaning towards less aid to foreign countries, as we try to cut wasteful spending. The American government is finally opening its eyes to the realization that all of the aid we are giving out may not be worth it. Our priority should be to help our homeless, instead of other countries' poor.
At that time in the early 1990’s the U.S. was the only superpower country left in the world. The Soviet Union collapsed after the Cold War and the left the U.S. at the top. With the U.S. being the only superpower left, it meant that they were the only ones who could try to keep peace between other countries and hopefully end violence in the world. At the time, Somalia was a complete disaster and still is to this day. They have no structural government and warlords rule parts of the country. The one warlord at the time, Mohamed Farrah Aidid, was stealing shipments of food from the U.S. to the starving citizens in the rest of Somalia. The U.S. did not like this, so they set up a plan to capture Aidid and his men in a building near the Bakaara Market. The U.S. just got done defeating Saddam Hussein’s army in the first Gulf War. Before the war, Hussein had one of the largest armies in the world. The U.S. defeated them in a couple of weeks and gave them a massive amount of confidence going into this raid to try to capture Aidid.
The repeated use of drugs often causes both physical and psychological dependence, as mentioned in an article by the Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia (“Drug Dependence”). In order for an individual to truly be set free from their addiction, seeking treatment is necessary. Rehab centers are a great place with scientifically proven methods to cure those addicted to drugs. It is important to try to end drug use in our country, rather than allowing it to continue longer than it already has. While funding for rehabilitation facilities could become an issue, drug users may continue their addiction without proper treatment, and therefore those arrested for drug use should be sent to a rehabilitation center instead of prison.
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
International Aid operates in almost every corner of the globe, is part of the transfer of billions of dollars of assistance through countless organizations, charities, and funds; and involves the efforts of hundreds of thousands of dedicated workers and affects billions of people. . This paper will provide a historical summary of how aid has grown and developed in stages, from a humanitarian concept first applied in the 19th century to established international policy and law following the Second World War and later the Cold War. We will review the impact of the wave of newly independent nations in the 1940’s and 1950’s and the rise of multinational aid organizations in the 1970’s and non-governmental organizations (NGO’s) in the 1980’s. We will conclude by detailing recent emerging trends in aid through the 1990’s into the present day.
In the book Kids Having Kids: “Researchers have found that many negative outcomes among teen mothers are the result off their disadvantage social and economic background before they had a baby” (Hoffman, Saul D). Teenagers that find themselves pregnant often have a hard time in school and end up affiliating themselves with dangerous individuals. Teen mothers who are hispanic often face financial instability because of their inability to speak the language. Obtaining knowledge of the main language is important towards financial success. Many teen mothers that don’t speak english end up in environments that are not suitable to them or children. By leaving in these low poverty urban areas increases the risk of early age sex,having a criminal record, sexual abuse, drug use and low academic test scores. Studies show that hispanic children raise by teenage mother are more likely to drink by 18 years of age, smoke marijuana, and be delinquents. Statistics that lead failure in the classroom and a dysfunctional future. Most time hispanic mothers are not the one at fault because of their inability in the workplace. There are many cases that hispanic mothers are forced to stay in low income communities because the complexity of their situation. Hispanics as well as other races are blame for the “root of urban
Not only is it the individuals lifestyle that contributes to their overall health, but it is also things such as their environment that they live and the circumstances they live in (World Health Organization).These are called determinants. When discussing environment pertaining to health, we must take into consideration that this also means the social, economic, physical environment. As stated by Levins and Lopez, “Genes may influence how we relate to our environments, while society can determine the environments that we face..” (p. 270) indiciating that it is not only one factor that determines our health, but many. At a York University Conference held in Toronto in 2002, 14 different social determinants of health were using ranging from Aboriginal status to unemployment, to food insecurity (Mikkonen, Raphael, 2010). There are also factors such as income and social factors, education, genetics, social support networks, health services and even gender that are determinants of health. Something we individuals need to remember is that we cannot blame people for having bad health when some of the determining factors are completely out of their control. I feel that a person 's physical environment are one of the most important determinants of health due to the damage it can do to one if they have a poor environment surrounding them. Where an individual is born and raised is not a choice that people get to
In her article Kristin Mitchell said that “The average cost of someone in the program is $32,974 compared to the $64,338 needed to send him or her to prison for 25 months, or the average prison sentence for drug offenders. Though the treatment in prison can help them while being there. In prison, they have classes where they talk about how you got into jail and how many times you been in jail for the same thing(which is drugs , alcohol, etc) and what can you do to fix it. They help you get better, every time you have that chance to go in there everyone has the chose to talk about how they got into their addiction. In prison they have no choice but to go to the treatment. When they are out of prison, however, they have choices that they must make and many people fall back into their old habits. Treatment centers offer more choices. For this reason, treatment centers provide a more realistic solution to the problem of addiction
In addition to health care interventions and a person's surroundings, a number of other factors are known to influence the health status of individuals, including their background, lifestyle, and economic and social conditions. In addition to health care interventions and a person's surroundings, a number of other factors are known to influence the health status of individuals, including their background, lifestyle, and economic and social conditions.
The high price that consumers pay also contributes to the sustainable development of the society. Some Canadians can run to several shops and compare prices to buy their daily necessities, but people would like to spend more money buying beef and poultry at Whole Foods Market. Almost all urban Canadians are aware that there are hormone-free, antibiotics-free, and in feeding process meats available at Whole Foods Market, since they try and protect "animal welfare". Some middle-class consumers think that eating such meat is much more humane, not considering the more expensive cost. In summary, a sensitive nerve point of the Canadian middle-class people is hit all of a sudden by Whole Foods Market due to its advocate of environmental protection, healthy and green food as well as high quality life. Customers who frequently visit Whole Foods Markets have a religious-like devotion. There are already two branches in Toronto, respectively ‘Yonge and Sheppard’ in 4771 Yonge Street Toronto and ‘Yorkville’ in 87 Avenue Rd Toronto. Johnston (2011) had conducted ‘in-depth interviews on food shoppers at Whole Foods Market’ to investigate their constitution, shopping concepts and habits. Consumer shopping at Whole Foods Market can obtain idea of ‘shopping for change’. In a Whole Foods Market location in downtown Toronto, Johnston (2011) found that consumers who often go to Whole Foods Market are wealthy as well as educated, especially white. And their household incomes are generally much higher than the average. This consumer composition is a reflection of the population and environment of this affluent downtown neighbourhood, as well as the primary group of individuals who have increasing requirements for natural and organic
Poor countries have been receiving aid from the international community for over a century now. While such aid is supposed to be considered an act of kindness from the donor nations or international bodies, it has led to over dependence among the developing countries. They have adopted the habit of estimating and including international aid in their national budgets to reduce their balance of trade deficits. It is believed that foreign aid is necessary for poor nations in order to break the cycle of poverty that ties their citizens in low productivity zones and so their economy will not be weak. However, some critics view the extension of aid to poor countries as means of keeping the nations in economic slumber so that they can wake up from only by devising ways of furthering self-sustainability. Because of these two schools of thought concerning the topic, debate has arisen on which side is more rational and factual than the other. The non-sustainable nature of international aid, however, leaves the question of what may happen in the event that foreign aid is unavailable for the poor nations. After thorough consideration on the effects of the assistance to poor countries, it is sufficient to state that giving international aid to the poor nations is more disadvantageous than beneficial to the nations. This point is argued through an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of giving international aid to the poor countries with appropriate examples drawn from various regions of the world to prove the stance.