Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Foreign aid pros and cons
Foreign aid pros and cons
Foreign aid pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Foreign aid is a voluntary transmission of resources from one country to another. Foreign aid can be divided into military aid and economic assistance. Most of the countries encourage foreign aid as it can help third world countries and save lives. This sort of aid can bring relief and ameliorate suffering, not just in the short term but also in the long run. (Nairobi 2010) It is not only strong countries that can provide aid, some of the private organizations can also take the initiative to participate in it. Although some of the politicians say that foreign aid is just a waste of funds, foreign aid should be encouraged because it saves lives, improves both donors and recipients’ economic growth and provides security to poor countries. …show more content…
Disadvantages of foreign aid includes the fact that the funds channeled is wasted because the receiving governments do not use the money wisely. Some of the politicians exploits the money and spends it satisfy their own greed. According to Jonathan Foreman (2013), the decision made by the Indian government to reduce the number of non-school children by five million since 2003 was just an illusion. The government gave the cash instead to imaginary schools and used the money to buy luxurious cars for officials. Besides, some governments spent the money on unimportant and unessential fields. According to Jonathan Foreman (2013), the Indian government had spent most of the money on bureaucracy and self-indulgence which are not very important to them. Another example, a £47 million project in wealthy Indonesia destined to help the government there with ‘effective leadership and management of climate change programming’. However, there are dissents over the disputed controversy. From this point of view, we are able to notice the fact that foreign aid is constrained by plausible misuse of money by the recipient’s government is false and irrelevant as foreign aid can be seen as one initiative to empower economic growth in countries, particularly less developed nations, such as Bangladesh and India. For example, development in Bangladesh is solely dependent on budget on aid which has made a significant contribution to the reconstruction of its economy. Furthermore, in India, foreign aid has financed more than 8 percent of the domestic investments and some 15 percent of imports. Millions of children in Africa are alive appreciate to the control of measles and other vaccinations. International cooperation that fight HIV/AIDS and Malaria has successfully saved hundreds of thousands more lives (Abugre
The Negative Force of American Expansionism and Imperialism Many people believe that American Expansionism and Imperialism was a positive force, that it did more good than bad. However, many people disagree with this popular notion. Many good things do come out of it, but the bad ultimately trumps the good. There were several problems between whites and Natives and because of the problems countless people died. To start off, American Expansionism and Imperialism brought isolation to America.
middle of paper ... ... 8.4 (2006): 29-56. Print. McVety, Amanda Kay. Enlightened Aid: U.S. Development as Foreign Aid Policy in Ethiopia.
... aid across the world. As we have established that we do have an obligation to redistribute globally in a cosmopolitan perspective, distributing wealth however we may need to rethink what the best assistance is. Amaryta Sen conveys that before sending aid to the third world state, we would need to fully understand the limitation of freedom in the country. Redistributing wealth to global countries requires it to be evaluated by the economic shortage that they are suffering and to see whether it will be efficient in the long run. The more effective ways to contribute would be to international relief agencies or NGO’s that would pursue international development projects to help those in poverty or the alternative option by Tom Campbell’s idea of a ‘Global humanitarian levy’ which suggests a more appropriate taxation on all citizens to collectively aid those in need.
poor towns which have had a lack of food sources due to the serious poverty,
Jamieson, D. (2005). Duties to the Distant: Aid, Assistance, and Intervention in the Developing World. Journal Of Ethics, 9(1/2), 151-170. doi:10.1007/s10892-004-3324-9
Developed countries should not simply hand money to third world countries, as this gives no incentive to develop responsible government or fiscal policies. Dambisa Moyo, an international economist from Zambia, comments on foreign aid, stating that “aid is easy money” (Collier). If a person were to give a man in need a small sum of m...
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
Foreign aid to countries can help in many ways. It can be used as a
The first reasons to think that foreign aid should be spend is that “Aid saves lives” which is clearly illustrated by the researches conducted. Compare 1990 to 2010, as a result of aid in vaccines and health, there was a decrease in number of children who died from illness of pneumonia and diarrhoea (BBC). For example, in Botswana, the foreign aid fund had provided a test of HIV for pregnant mothers and therefore decrease the amount of newborn babies which catches HIV. Furthermore, in Bangladesh, there is a 62% drop in death rate for the under five children, the aid fund allows the government to be able to afford “vaccines and trained the midwives”.
The arrival of Mr. Bingley, a wealthy man, caused commotion in the town of Longbourn. In the household of the Bennet family, Mrs. Bennet tried so desperately to get Bingley to marry one of her five daughters: Elizabeth, Jane, Lydia, or Mary. He becomes smitten with Jane after he meets her at a ball. Mr. Darcy, Bingley’s friend, tends to be very rude to Elizabeth. After attending a few more social gatherings, Bingley and Jane grew closer to each other whereas Darcy started to feel some attraction to Elizabeth’s intelligence and beauty. Then we jump to Mr. Collins, Mr. Bennet’s cousin, who appears because he is looking for someone to marry. We also meet Wickham, an army officer who Elizabeth finds charming and feels that Darcy wronged him in
Globalization refers to the absence of barriers that every country had. Yes, it has helped to demolish the walls that separated us .Globalization, which is the process of growing interdependence among every country in this planet, can be seen as a sign of hopeful and better future by some, but for others it represents a huge disaster for the whole world. That’s why we are going to see the negative effect that globalization has on culture then focus on the ethical disadvantage it brought, to finally talk about the damage it did to skilled workers.
Poor countries have been receiving aid from the international community for over a century now. While such aid is supposed to be considered an act of kindness from the donor nations or international bodies, it has led to over dependence among the developing countries. They have adopted the habit of estimating and including international aid in their national budgets to reduce their balance of trade deficits. It is believed that foreign aid is necessary for poor nations in order to break the cycle of poverty that ties their citizens in low productivity zones and so their economy will not be weak. However, some critics view the extension of aid to poor countries as means of keeping the nations in economic slumber so that they can wake up from only by devising ways of furthering self-sustainability. Because of these two schools of thought concerning the topic, debate has arisen on which side is more rational and factual than the other. The non-sustainable nature of international aid, however, leaves the question of what may happen in the event that foreign aid is unavailable for the poor nations. After thorough consideration on the effects of the assistance to poor countries, it is sufficient to state that giving international aid to the poor nations is more disadvantageous than beneficial to the nations. This point is argued through an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of giving international aid to the poor countries with appropriate examples drawn from various regions of the world to prove the stance.
The interrelation and the integration of people, companies, governments and nations can be described as globalization. Globalization was produced due to international trade and investments with the help of technology. In today’s world, globalization is very essential. The advancements and technology help the process needed it for globalization. Many countries and organizations similarly are affected by this phenomenon, on the other hand, smaller countries have benefit from larger contributors in the world’s market.
Bangladesh has been working to improve its country because it is one of the poorest ones in the world (Islam, 1992). It is one the world’s most densely populated countries with 161 million people. Forty-three percent of the people there still live there and it till has one of the highest prevalence of child malnutrition in the world at 41% (Bangladesh, n.d.)). Foreign aid has been given to the country to try and help get them out of poverty. From the period of 1971 to 2012, Bangladesh received about $56.5 billion in foreign aid (Hossain, 2014). The annual flow ranges from $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion (Quibria, 2010). The United States contributes about 6.29% of the foreign assistance to Bangladesh as bilateral donors (Hossain, 2014).
Globalization is a term that is difficult to define, as it covers many broad topics in the global arena. However, it can typically be attributed to the advancement of economic, social, and cultural interactions among the companies, citizens, organizations, and governments of nations; globalization also focuses on the interactions and integration of countries (The Levin Institute 2012). Many in the Western world promote globalization as a positive concept that allows growth and participation in a global community. Conversely, the negative aspects rarely receive the same level of attention. Globalization appears to be advantageous for the privileged few, but the benefits are unevenly distributed. For example, the three richest people in the world possess assets that exceed the Gross National Product of all of the least developed countries and their 600 million citizens combined (Shawki and D’Amato 2000). Although globalization can provide positive results to some, it can also be a high price to pay for others. Furthermore, for all of those who profit or advance from the actions related to globalization, there are countless others who endure severe adverse effects.