In times of war, tragedy, and suffering, there has always been a call for humanitarian aid. As the number of humanitarian emergencies increase, David Rieff recognizes and details the ways in which humanitarianism has transformed in his book, A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis, and critically reflects on the impact of humanitarianism and humanitarian efforts. In this essay, I plan to summarize Rieff's argument regarding humanitarianism and its impact. Then, I will engage with Rieff’s main ideas by responding to the core elements of his argument. Finally, I will acknowledge the themes and ideas introduced in the book that deserve further exploration.
Given the title of his book, David Rieff’s main idea claims that humanitarianism is in a state of crisis because humanitarian efforts are inadequate. Rieff argues that humanitarianism, despite its moral intentions, negatively transformed into an ineffective movement that fails to carry out its mission of providing relief aid. The author
…show more content…
questions “ . . . whether it is wise to insist that the moral universalism championed by human rights activists is making enough headway in the world to make it safer for the victims of contemporary atrocities,” (Rieff 13). Rieff implies that the morale of humanitarians and humanitarianism is not sufficient in assisting populations suffering from tragedy, and conclusively becomes a false hope to those in dire need of rescue (Rieff 12). As a result of this false hope, humanitarianism remains ambitious and unproductive. Why? Rieff attributes this reality to politicization and institutionalization. In his article, Humanitarianism Transformed, Michael Barnett reviews the infusion of politicization, institutionalization, and humanitarianism to explain the emergence of humanitarianism’s current state.
Rieff alludes to this infusion to explain why humanitarianism is not working. The critic argues that humanitarianism, as a result of politicization, cultivated into a political blanket exploited by the “international community” in order to disguise and hide the lack of political action in humanitarian emergencies, thus delineating from the main goal of humanitarianism. To further his argument, Rieff recounts four cases of humanitarian emergencies in Rwanda, Afghanistan, Kosovo, and Bosnia in which humanitarian efforts were not useful, carried out, or even harmful in some instances. Rieff’s frustration with this relationship is relatable; however, While I agree with Rieff in regards to humanitarianism transformative trend, Rieff fails to expound on a number of key
ideas. The central and key point of Rieff’s argument surrounds the notion that humanitarianism has shifted in a direction that is not only ineffective, but potentially harmful. I don’t disagree with Rieff on this reality; however, Rieff fails to offer solutions. The author solidly presents his argument and introduces appropriate evidence to support his claim, but his work ends there. Possibly, the goal of his book was not to offer a solution, but rather to reflect on a reality. Rieff does acknowledge his personal belief that humanitarianism won’t change or become more effective. Although, Rieff does offer that humanitarian should focus solely on its humanitarian efforts, but does not suggest what this shift would look like, or how this shift could be achieved. In addition to lack of solutions, Rieff doesn’t fully acknowledge the new reality of humanitarianism. He writes about the politicization and the institutionalization, but these elements only construct part of the story. The need for humanitarianism has increased as times have changed, primarily the world is developing much more of a global community and becoming globally interdependent. With this is in mind, it is not reasonable to maintain a humanitarianism that is apolitical, particularly because many humanitarian emergencies emerged on a political basis. Using Rieff’s example of the Rwandan genocide, the genocide lasted for as long as it did and was as tragic as it was because Hutu powers had political power and support to justify the killings. How can humanitarians intervention effectively execute its mission while ignoring the very root of the emergency? Assuming humanitarianism is a movement that will forever be political, is the issue with the presence of politicization and institutionalization, or how humanitarians interact these two realities. Rather than denouncing how politicized humanitarianism, humanitarians may need to rethink their efforts in order to encompasses politicization and institutionalization in a more productive and strategic manner. With this idea in mind, the relationship between humanitarianism, politicization, and institutionalization ought to be explored more. Rieff suggests that it is politicization and institutionalization that are responsible for humanitarianism downfall, but this exploration on this relationship could reveal possible solutions on how to amend humanitarian efforts, and strengthen humanitarianism itself. Additionally, this exploration would remove focus on deconstructing these new elements and shift energy on mitigating their impacts and altering their consequences. Exploration on the relationship between politicization, institutionalization, and humanitarianism would lead to much more productive conversation regarding the future of humanitarianism and humanitarian efforts.
Her memoir starts off in Darfur in 2005, where in her late 20’s, she hits rock bottom while managing a refugee camp for 24,000 civilians. It backtracks to her internship in Rwanda, while moving forward to her challenges in Darfur, in addition to her experiences in post- tsunami Indonesia, and post-quake in Haiti. By sharing her story, Alexander gives readers an opportunity to go behind-the-scenes into the devastations that are censored on media outlets. She stresses that these are often the problems that individuals claim they are educated on, but rarely make it their priority to solve. However, that is not the case for Jessica Alexander as she has over 12 years of experience working with different NGO’s and UN operations. As a result, Alexander earns the credibility to critique the multi-billion-dollar humanitarian aid industry. From her painful yet rewarding work experience, Alexander gives an honest and empathetic view of humanitarian aid as an establishment and a
The author, Gloria Ladson-Billings, discusses in her book, "The Dreamkeepers: Successful Teachers of African American Children," how African American students perform at lower academic levels in part due to teacher approaches and attitudes. She performed a study on eight teachers of different races and backgrounds and their approaches to teaching African American students. The purpose of the study was to identify what approaches or techniques have been most successful in helping African American students to achieve academic success. She also focuses on the idea of "culturally relevant teaching" and how it can positively impact students when teachers are aware and incorporate a student's culture and backgrounds into the classroom. Throughout the book, the
In “On the American Indians” Vitoria argues that there are few situations that justify a country to use humanitarian intervention. Humanitarian intervention is defined as military force, publicly stated to end the violation of human rights, against another state. Vitoria discredits the justification of humanitarian intervention in every case, unless you are intervening for an ally or a friend. In this paper, I will argue that his view is more plausible than it may at first appear.
Since the beginning of time, our ancestors have made sacrifices for the next generation that brought us to where we are today. This idea is woven throughout the book Krik? Krak! Where the author, Edwidge Danticat, portrays fictional short stories people that live in the impoverished nation of Haiti, and how hard it is for families to stay together, provide for each other, and reach their goals of freedom. Danticat uses the motif of generations to illustrate the ideas of hope and survival to develop the theme of sacrifice for a better future of the youth.
An Imperfect Offering is a powerful personal memoir from a James Orbinski, a Canadian who has spent most of his adult life in front-line humanitarian work in the world's worst conflict zones. Despite its dark chapters, it is also a hopeful story about the emergence of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) as a new and independent agent of civil society, and the possibilities of making the world a better place. In “An Imperfect Offering”, James Orbinski tells the story of people who have been harmed by war, and humanitarian workers who have come to heal them when possible. He engages in deep reflection on the nature of humanitarian response and the many threats to this most human activity. He has sharp criticism for governments who act to cause suffering or to prevent its relief. He asks, “How am I able to be in relation to the suffering of others?” His life as a doctor, and a humanitarian worker illustrates this answer. Accordingly, the books main thesis is that humanitarianism is about the struggle to create space to be fully human. However, he illustrates how this struggle is becoming increasingly difficult with the imperfect offering of politics, which has resulted in the blurring of boundaries between humanitarian assistance and the political objectives of military intervention.
The novel begins with the letter that Edgar is writing to his fiancée Mary in which he explains to her his endeavour to locate the murderer of his friend, after which he sets out on his mission. He goes for a walk around the site where Waldegrave's body was found and there, for the first time, sees Clithero whom he describes as “ a figure, robust and strange, and half naked“ , immediately recognizing him as something opposite than himself and everyone around him. After a conversation with him, which seemed more like an interrogation, Edgar begins to empathize with Clithero and as he runs away into the forest, Edgar follows. He is threatened and in awe of this man's ability to find his way through the wilderness and suddenly a sense of rivalry arises in Edgar which turns into pure competition. Consequently, Edgar's inexplicably drawn to the character . He finds him in a cave resembling a madman, a savage, a barbarian: "His grey coat, extended claws, fiery eyes, and a cry which he at that moment uttered, and which, by its resemblance to the human voice, is peculiarly terrific, denoted him to be the most ferocious and untamable of that detested race" . At the entrance of the cave, a panther appears as a symbol of Clithero's transformation into a primal, animalistic creature. That night, Edgar experiences sleepwalking for the first time and a sequence of occurrences begins which leads him deeper into the wilderness of the forest, as well as the wilderness of his identity. What comes next is a scene of Edgar waking up at the bottom of a dark pit in which he fell while sleepwalking. He wakes up to find himself almost entirely naked, covered in blood and with no sign of civilization whatsoever. As he succeeds to crawl out of the pit, he ...
In the Chapter “A Night” from Hospital Sketches, Louisa May Alcott describes her typical night as a nurse during the Civil War. Though Alcott did serve as a nurse in the Civil War for a brief period of time “A Night” is a fictional story of what Alcott actually experienced. A major part of this chapter has to do with the fictitious wounded soldier named John. Although many readers may just see John as Alcott’s idea of a perfect man, I argue that John is more than what is described, Instead, John is an allegory for a higher power. John, given the state he is in, is unrealistically perfect and provides a light to many wounded in the darkness of war.
In Guy de Maupassant’s “The Terror” a man, who remains unnamed, attempts to persuade the reader that he is not completely insane by explaining the situation that has driven him to this He first says that he is marrying a woman whom he has seen only four or five times because he is afraid of being alone. He tells the reader not to judge him until he explains himself. He continues to explain by setting up a scenario that he has lived through. He came home one night, walked into his room, which he had always left locked, and found it unlocked. He meanders in and sees a man in his armchair by the fire. He is not alarmed by the man, thinking that he is a friend come to visit. He goes over to the man, and reaches to wake him where he has fallen asleep. Suddenly the man is not there, vanished into thin air.
Wheeler, Nicholas J. ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21,3 (1992)
Picture books are books in which both words and illustrations are essential to the story’s meaning (Brown, Tomlinson,1996, Pg.50). There are so many different kinds of children’s books. There are books for every age and every reading level. There are many elements that go into picture books such as line and spacing, color and light, space and perspective, texture, composition and artistic media. Picture books are an essential learning element in today’s classroom.
Throughout history, there have been many noteworthy events that have happened. While there are many sources that can explain these events, historical fiction novels are some of the best ways to do so, as they provide insight on the subject matter, and make you feel connected to the people that have gone through it. An example of a historical fiction that I have just read is The Boy in the Striped Pajamas by John Boyne, a story about the life of a German boy who becomes friends with a Jewish boy in a concentration camp during the holocaust. The author of The Boy in the Striped Pajamas portrays the historical period well,and uses many details from the real life holocaust to make his story more believable. This book is a classic, and is a very good look on how it feels to be living in Nazi Germany.
Barnett, Michael, and Thomas G. Weiss. Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2008.
Though it is well-known that rape is an awful experience for someone, people’s thoughts regarding the actual effects and negative results it produces do not go beyond this broad assumption of rape being a horrible action. Margaret Atwood recognizes this and takes a different approach on informing society about specific effects rape can have on an individual. Through her short story “Stone Mattress,” Atwood covers these topics in a subtle manner where the information better relates to the reader whereas bombarding them with it. Her topics confronting rape and its repercussion that seem to only affect the victim are the focal points of the story, but Atwood includes other elements of fiction to draw the reader in and captivate their attention.
Various schools of thought exist as to why genocide continues at this deplorable rate and what must be done in order to uphold our promise. There are those who believe it is inaction by the international community which allows for massacres and tragedies to occur - equating apathy or neutrality with complicity to evil. Although other nations may play a part in the solution to genocide, the absolute reliance on others is part of the problem. No one nation or group of nations can be given such a respo...
Baldauf, S. (2009). Why the US didn't intervene in the Rwandan genocide. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/2009/0407/p06s14-woaf.html [Accessed: 21 Feb 2014].