Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Student record tracking systems research proposal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Student record tracking systems research proposal
To track or not to track, that is the question. Tracking devices in student IDs has been a topic of discussion all across the US. Some schools have implemented the tracking devices in the student IDs just this past year. Whether people agree or disagree with having the tracking devices, the subject has gone to a judge. The use of tracking devices has a wide range of views on it, from people completely against them for every possible reason, to people that want them for safety and security. Some argue that it is an invasion of privacy, or it goes against their religious beliefs. Others argue that it will help keep students safe, and they can be used in an emergency.
Tracking devices should be used in student IDs in schools.
The safety of students in the main argument for the people wanting the tracking devices. “School personnel can
…show more content…
Then having the student coming in without a pass saying they were in the office at the time. With the tracking devices, a teacher could locate the students before they show up late to prove they were actually where they said they were. “...locating kids who are not in their chairs to answer 'present,' but are in the building - in the counselor's office, in the cafeteria, in the hallway, in the gym - if we can show they were, in fact, in school, then we can count them present.” (Garcia). When a student comes into class late, you have to wonder if they are telling the truth about where they are. During homeroom, when a student says they are going to a teacher’s room, the homeroom teacher could in fact verify that the student went to the room they said they were going to. This would also help out the teachers that forget to email another teacher that they have a student in their room. Having the tracking devices in the student’s IDs would greatly help the teachers in times when there is a lot going on. With every argument, there is another
It’s important not to overlook the fact that young people’s privacy is equally as important as anyone else’s. The fact that they’re young students increases the need for student privacy, as our minds can be more vulnerable and fragile. Privacy can ensure feelings of safety and comfort. The first and one of the most important reasons locker searches shouldn’t be conducted is because of how it affects student trust. When students are informed their lockers can be searched at any time, it may give them the impression that they’re not trusted and are doing something wrong, even if that student is completely innocent.
Grabber- We are all privileged to live in a free nation, where we can do what we desire. But, what if one day you were told that your school can monitor your every action on the interweb and can punish you for your online activities on and off campus? Well, certainly many students would protest without hesitating, for that they would no longer have privacy.
In light of recent acts of violence in the nation’s schools, school safety and security have become a hot topic. However, the issue of school safety goes beyond student violence. It includes property damage, theft, and anything else that concerns the overall well being of schools. While it is important to create a safe environment in schools it is also necessary to make sure students feel comfortable in this atmosphere. The security can not be so overbearing that it becomes a negative tactic that gets in the way of the students main objective, learning. Barely noticeable cameras, ID cards, and security guards without uniforms can help generate this safe, but comfortable learning environment. On the other hand metal detectors and mini police forces may be a little too reminiscent of George Orwell’s novel, 1984, or even modern prisons. School security should not be overbearing or obtrusive where it gets in the way of a comfortable environment that is conducive to learning in the nation’s schools.
Ideally schools in the United States are considered by both parents and students alike to be “safe-havens” where parents can trust their children to learn and remain safe during the day and where students can feel safe in a well-maintained learning environment. However within this fully regulated government service, there are often debates over proper classroom environments, teaching tactics, and privacy issues. Today the main privacy issue in public schools is where to draw the line between keeping the school safe and maintaining the privacy of the students (Boomer par. 19). Searches and seizures in schools are not recent issues; however they are becoming more public now than in recent years.
To begin with no technology is 100% secure, if the kids’ location can be visible to hackers, this information can be used to harm them. In the Article, Irvine mentions “Parents are notified by text message, e-mail, or phone” about their kids activities at school. This information is also risk as emails can be hacked, Imagine it can be used to kidnap kids of a rich or high official for ransom. Privacy is a serious matter, and hackers can also use technology to commit crimes against such families. Irvine says, “High-tech methods to track everything” are available, that's means that there is always someone watching. Irvine says, “Big Mother” or “Big Father” who is watching, but it can also be “Big Kidnapper” or “Big Sex Offender.” In other words, their kids will be under surveillance of many unknowns. Also anybody might forget their phone in public places and what if some crazy person got it? That person can use this information and see all the communication and find out where the kids are going. As a result, these devices can be tools for hackers to use to harm the kids...
If a student decides to skip class knowing that they are being tracked and knowing that the school will inform their parents of their location, it is embarrassing. College students get caught up in the new found freedom they never had and make poor decisions like skipping class. College is the place to make and learn from mistakes without having anyone telling you what to do and how to fix it. Using high-tech trackers defeats the purpose of learning from mistakes and removes the choice students can make towards a certain class. For example, if a student needs a mental health day and decides not to attend class, their parents would immediately know and will most likely argue and lecture the student.
Northern Arizona University set up these electronic scanners outside of classrooms so that they can monitor who actually shows up to class. They have to scan their ID and when the light turns green they are marked present. It bothers a lot of people because they feel like college is a time where they finally get to make decisions on their own. The students feel like it is very unnecessary because it shouldn't matter who shows up to class, it matters that you take part in the class discussion and actually learn. “ Rather than focusing on, ‘Did they scan their car?’- the more important thing to think about is what they are doing in the classroom” (University Attendance Scanners Make Some Uneasy). Paying for classes will not stop kids from skipping. A lot of people drop out of college before they even get a chance to finish it. “About 3 in every 10 students drop out after the first year” (University Attendance Scanners Make Some Uneasy). If putting this system in front of every class motivates people to show up to class and do their work then they hope that the dropout percentages will decrease. “ THe stronger a student’s grade performance in the first year, the far more likely they are to persist at NAU and graduate” University Attendance Scanners Make Some Uneasy). Even though that electronical scanner seems tedious, it will help more people in the long
To start off, when the schools that use technology in their classrooms they gather data on the students’ academic progress this may include students’ tests scores, over-all grade and the students’ attendance records and when share it with other school districts it may violate the students’ 4th amendment rights. The 4th amendment was made to protect or to enforce the people right to privacy, by giving the people (in this case the students) the right to be safe in their person, home, papers and
Opposition to surveillance in schools is characterized by accusations that surveillance methods infringe student rights. While very few oppose increasing security in schools, especially in the wake of seemingly constant school tragedies, many argue that the application of security measures is unfair and misdirected at mundane issues, resulting in the amplification of prejudices and the creation of an oppressive school ecosystem that places school administrators on an authoritative pedestal with the ability to abuse power. This leaves stakeholders searching for the right balance between security and freedom, and trying to find out where technology meant to be focused on protecting students goes wrong. Melinda Anderson’s report for The Atlantic
From this perspective, if schools give teens more privacy the student’s will be able to learn more on their own. An article called “School District 's Webcam Surveillance Focus of Suit” by Martha Moore a USA Today publisher on school issues, analyzes how a high school girl was hanging out with her friends and noticed a glowing green light on her computer, which means that the webcam is on either taking pictures or a video. The School District has admitted theft-tracking software which means it takes pictures of the people to know where the computer is at and who has it (Moore 1).This is something that schools shouldn 't be doing no student should be getting pictures of them taken without them knowing. This is going on in and out of the school which takes privacy away from the student in school and out of school and won 't make the students feel right using the laptops to do the work. Students and parents signed a policy acknowledging the school could monitor the laptop 's ' contents and Internet usage. “The policy doesn 't mention the school 's ability to use the webcams, theft-tracking devices that were supposed to be turned on if laptops were reported missing or stolen “(Moore 1). The high school was not even following their own rules and invaded the students’ privacy. This helps to show that teens do need more privacy because schools
Plus there are many consequences if you leave the classroom without one you are most likely going to get in trouble. A student in high school believes that passbooks are very unnecessary and tried to form a petition to eliminate passbooks off of her high school campus. A couple of teaches pitched in and helped find a better way to excuse a student from class. A teacher named Mr. Rogers decided that it'd be better if students carried a toy or any object. When students were given these objects, they returned to the classroom quickly, because they would not have wanted to hold that object the entire day, and would have been calmer if they returned the object and not have responsibility for
Students should never get any privacy. Have you noticed how dangerous schools have become? Students carry backpacks with them everywhere, teachers do not know what is in them. Also, we do not have metal detectors to help catch any dangerous things that may be brought into the schools. Although students have there right to privacy, public schools should be able to go through students backpacks and locker.
Ever since incidents such as 9/11 and Columbine, high schools have started implementing new rules regarding cellphones. Cellphones regard the attention of building managers, teachers, parents, and students. Although teachers see them as a distraction and a way to cheat, they can be quite helpful to students. School districts should permit students to use cellular devices in school for purposes of improving their education and providing themselves a sense of security.
Teachers should not be monitoring the students because their job is to teach, not to micromanage the students. When there is a problem, they should refer to the parents to fix the problem. It is the parent's job to raise the children in the right way, not the teacher’s job. However, schools can monitor students when the students are using school-issued devices. This is fair because the devices belong to the school, and they (the school) have the entire right to monitor them.
Technologies like computers or iPads (or anything with internet access for that matter) in the classroom could possibly distract students from their work. Classroom administrators seem to forget that the majority of students really don’t want to be in the classroom.. I remember when I was in highschool, whenever a teacher would bring students into a computer lab, or bring class sets of computers, or bring iPads into the classroom for a lesson a large portion would go onto twitter, or onto any unblocked flash game website whenever the teacher was not looking, try to access anything for them to “escape” the classroom. When there are a large majority of children and/or teens that do not want to go to school, and are given tools to be rebellious so easily, what is going to stop them? Aside, who really wants to sit through the same autonomous paper typing over and over again...