Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The controversy of the second amendment
Controversies on right to bear arms
The controversy of the second amendment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The controversy of the second amendment
Gun control is one of the most controversial and one of the most talked about topics in the U.S. Some believe that if guns are taken away that there will be less violence and that the death rate may even go down. While others believe that they have a right to bare arms like it states in the constitution. One of the most talked about reasons on why gun control should be stricter is the obvious: guns are not safe. But what people don’t understand is that everytime a gun is purchased a criminal background check is done right away. What people are unaware if is that the majority of people who purchase guns have already bought one in the past. Another talked about issue is the Right to Bear Arms. The Right to Bear arms has been in the constitution for decades. The constitution is not just something you can edit and re-write everytime you see a problem with it or think its “outdated” Lately, Gun control has been one of the most talked about topics in the nation. It is a very sensitive and controversial topic due to gun crime. These new restrictions not only affect people who oppose firearms, but especially the people who depend on it for protection.The right to bear arms is the peoples right to bear arms for their own defense. These are also the “political writings” of John Locke and many others.The concept of the “Right to bear arms” was derived from the Bill of Rights in 1689 which says: That the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as allowed by Law. Citizens have a right to bear arms gun control laws will not prevent gun violence Death by gun rates were lower before gun control was out into effect. As you can see from this chart the death by gun rates have decreased dram... ... middle of paper ... ...rict of Columbia vs Heller The Supreme Court striked down the District of Columbia’s handgun ban and ruled that “the inherent right of self-defense has been central to the Second Amendment right,” and that the amendment protects “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation. This meaning is strongly confirmed by the historical background of the Second Amendment.” In Beard v. U.S. (1895), the court approved the common-law rule that a person “may repel force by force” in self-defense, and that, when attacked, a person “was entitled to stand his ground and meet any attack made upon him with a deadly weapon,” as needed to prevent “great bodily injury or death(NRA).” Forty Seven out of fifty states do not have gun control laws and the sates that do have them like New Jersey, New York City and California have higher crime rates (NRA).
In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity... Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to call on the government to take action. By enacting more laws and stricter control, these people not in favor of guns feel society would be better safer.
John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, stated, "States with the largest increases in gun ownership also have the largest drops in violent crimes... The effect on 'shall-issue ' [concealed gun] laws on these crimes [where two or more people were killed] has been dramatic. When states passed these laws, the number of multiple-victim shootings declined by 84 percent. Deaths from these shootings plummeted on average by 90 percent and injuries by 82
Miller, an interesting precedent was set. The courts ruled some restrictions and regulations on guns (Short barreled Shotguns and short barreled rifles) as constitutional. This court case was one of the earlier Supreme Court decisions dealing with the second amendment.(United States V. Miller) It set a limit on the freedom citizens have with guns and really started gun control. The court case District of Columbia vs. Heller also set a very interesting precedent. The Supreme Court ruled the Firearms Regulations Act of 1975 as unconstitutional and also ruled the right to own firearms as an individual right to self defence.(DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA) The right to bear arms will not be infringed, even if there is no modern militia to be registered in. This idea is really solidified in the Presser vs. Illinois court case. The court 's rulings were very clear again stating that the right to bear arms is an individual
“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms. Although this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive; they exacerbate the problem instead of fixing it. Besides the fact that the American Constitution guarantees its citizens the right to bear arms, the idea of restricting gun ownership in order to reduce firearm-related violence would ultimately fail given the previous experiments of gun control in England and in numerous states.
Every day some news related to gun violence are being heard all over the world. Shooting in driveway, public places, schools, homicide and suicide are some of different types of gun violence. Shooting on people and killing them is a big issue in the world and different comments are provided about that. One of the most important of them is about gun control laws. Stingl (2013) says “The term gun control as it is used in the United States refers to any action taken by the federal government or by state or local governments to regulate, through legislation, the sale, purchase, safety, and use of handguns and other types of firearms by individual citizens.” According to this idea gun control laws should be stricter and people should not be able to have access to guns easily. However, there are many other people who believe this idea is not a good solution and never help. This essay will demonstrate for and against views about the topic. People who agree with this idea consider: firstly, stricter laws will reduce violence and gun control means crime control. Secondly, some research shows people with gun are more at risks of getting shot. Thirdly, guns can always be misused by their owners and finally, stricter law is the best and the faster way to control crime and make community safe. While opponents say first of all, guns are necessary for people safety and protection. Secondly, guns are not the only tools for killing and violence; there are other weapons too and finally, gun ownership is human rights.
Gun control is an awfully big issue in the United States today. Many people in America don’t agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns and freedom away from law-abiding citizens. Many citizens have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns aren’t very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection when used correctly. The second amendment states “the right to bear arms”; does this grant everyone the right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for the good guy average Joe to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea, and are taking part in the loss of our freedom that was given to us.
In the United States guns have played a large role in death since the 14th century, when they were first introduced to America (“Gun Timeline”). Recently there
“A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,” wrote James Madison into the constitution of the United States. However, compared to that of Japan, whom allow no guns to be held by citizens, the United States allowed and perceived constitution in such a way that allows thousands of people to die yearly. Some argue that gun control is against the constitution in their perception, yet it clearly states that guns should be “well-regulated,” firstly. Even though guns may prevent assaults and robberies, it is imperative that the conditions of firearm possession be impeded beyond current means because the availability of guns correlates with an increase of homicide, yet the United States currently has the highest rate of gun violence, and over 50% of the world’s guns.
With the copious amounts of senseless tragedies occurring in the US, enforcing gun restrictions to increase the overall safety of the citizens is something Congress needs to stand behind. Throughout the past several years the security has been stripped from simple day trips to the movies, schools, nights clubs, or even a Sunday afternoon at church due to the spontaneous and inexplicable mass shootings. As an additive, there is incessant worry over the increasing and reoccurring terrorist attacks.
Gun violence in the u.s cannot be compared to other countries, because Americans everywhere have a high demand for guns, the fact that we rely on guns we have worst gun violence than other countries. In fact data was collected by united nations simon rodgers for the guardian that the u.s has lead the race in homicides by gun. Data “shows that America far and away leads other developed countries when it comes to gun-related homicide, due to Americans huge demand for firearms and need for protection.”
There are several topics that can become hard to talk about as conversation becomes very tense and or emotional, but Gun Control is one of the tougher ones. People can get very defensive and it is easy to become biased to such. I understand that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I do not mean to offend anyone in any way with what I have to say. It’s just very easy for me to talk about. I am captivated by this topic because I believe that some people’s opinions are based purely off statements they have heard and they are not actually educated on the matter. I by no means want to intrude on anyone’s viewpoints, I just simply would like people to understand and become educated on the problem. As you can probably see, I am against gun control. My point is not to change people’s views or feelings on the subject, but just to help them see why some of us feel the way we do.
The violent video game controversy never ends, and even if it does, the monster in the console will awaken and run amok swinging its pendulum to hypnotize and gain control over the minds of kids and teens alike to become aggressive, rabid animals. But you can tame it. There is a way to control the one that roams the box.
Between 1999 and 2013 there were a total of 464,000 gun deaths. Of said deaths, 270,237 of them were suicides, 174,773 homicides, and 9,983 unintentional deaths. The United States, by far, leads the world in deaths via firearms. The connection between how easy it is to gain access to firearms and the number of firearm related deaths is undeniable. Countries such as Japan, Canada, UK, Norway and others are stricter on gun control and it shows in the statistics. For every 100,000 people there 3.54 homicides in the US versus most of the countries listed previously are less than one. In order to prevent mass shootings and violence the United States must put in place laws making it more difficult to obtain firearms.
The topic of gun control is a reoccurring issue to be debated about in the United States. According to different groups of people, there are various opinions about this topic. The safest resolution would be to place stricter laws while attempting to possess a weapon. Crime is inevitable; however, the amount of casualties can be reduced.
Every year on average, 77,505 people are injured from guns and 33,636 people die from them.