More handpicked essays just for you.
Is gun control effective in reducing crime
Gun control can reduce crime essay
Gun control can reduce crime essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is gun control effective in reducing crime
The fight for Gun Rights
Every year on average, 77,505 people are injured from guns and 33,636 people die from them. 68% percent of people oppose the right to have a gun. Would taking away Guns help the situation any?
Many United States citizens fear that the right to have guns is a dangerous right to have. The main Political party To oppose gun rights are Democrats. This also includes candidates such as Hillary Clinton. Many Democratic officials state that making gun rights stricter will cause Gun related deaths and injuries to reduce. This will be true to a certain extent. Making Gun rights so strict to where you basically can’t even get a gun that easily anymore will actually cause more Crime and Gun deaths.
For example, If someone really wants a gun that bad, they would most likely turn to buying Black Market guns, which aren’t regulated or inspected by the NRA. Buying guns from this Black Market can cause more deaths from poorly inspected guns. Some black market guns are modified, or even stronger than a regular gun stored in regular stores that are inspected. Black Markets also sell a lot more dangerous guns. You can buy fully automatic guns here without having any paperwork. Automatic guns can range from a cheap 450$ to an expensive 10,000$. Most people who are highly dangerous don’t go to a legal gun dealer, they go on the internet or the Black Market to have someone buy it for them.
…show more content…
If people didn’t have guns, then it would be easier for criminals to kill them. Guns can also be used to stop a mass shooting from
Left, right, Liberal, Conservative, Democratic, Republican. There are a lot of synonyms for the sides of our nation divided. Divided on many things: religion, political views, morals, etc.. For a nation that prides ourselves on extraordinary security and unity, it is quite ironic that so many issues can cause such distress and uproar within communities. One such issue is gun control. As a white male in a middle-lower class family that has never owned a gun, I may be somewhat biased. Objectively as I can, I am going to report the facts and more importantly, try to find the core issues at play.
McMahan, 3) So, McMahan’s main premises come into play, either everyone has guns, including criminals, or nobody has guns. “Gun advocates prefer for both rather than neither to have them” McMahan remarks, but ultimately that will just leave the country open to more violence and tragedies. “As more private individuals acquire guns, the power of the police declines, personal security becomes a matter of self help, and the unarmed have an incentive to get guns.” (McMahan, 2) Now everyone is armed, and everyone has the ability to kill anyone in an instant, making everyone less secure. Just as all the states would be safer if nobody were to possess the nuclear weapons, our country would be safer if guns were banned from private individuals and criminals.
Violence related to guns is a prominent issue in America. Guns are a means to an end; meaning guns have played a strong role in suicides, murders, and injuries. In the past decade there has been an average of 400-500 thousand incidents of firearms per year (Gun Violence). The number of injured people from firearm incidents in the United States per year for the past decade is 400-600 thousand people (Gun Violence). These statistics are absolutely shocking to anyone. The amount of violence and crime that comes from guns is enormous. It is imperative that proper gun control is put into place by means of background checks and proper training. It can almost be certain that the number of incidents of accidental discharges from children and the number of victims affected by gun crimes in general can be highly reduced.
...he gun debate in America, has many people talking about how dangerous guns could be. Trying to avoid people to buy guns or eliminate guns would not help because guns could be brought illegally. Background checks would only work if the government makes the law stricter but since is not yet strict, then things will still remain the same. Instead, of making more laws, the government should let people carry guns with them because the gun could be used for protection. There could have been a possibility that in the San Bernardino shooting, the 14 individuals who died in the attack, could have survived if those individuals had a gun. Who knows where and when a shooting could happen? No one knows but the one who will commit the crime. That is why having more guns could reduce individuals to get injured or die in a shooting. Which means that more guns will equal more safety.
Guns debate you. More gun control laws would not reduce gun deaths it would increase gun deaths because we need self. If we had more laws on guns the population of guns with criminals would shoot up. People need guns to protect their families and themselves. People need guns to survive with other deadly people in the world. The NRA is against this person who is trying to put these laws in. (Hillary Clinton) People need guns. I say this because the Military uses guns to protect themselves. Why should we not. We need guns in our lives they help protect your family and mine.
Each year in the US, around 30,000 people die from gunfire. Around half of these are murders, a little less than half are suicide, and the rest are lethal accidents. Of the annual 30,000 death toll, several hundred of the victims are children (Counterpoint: Gun Control Saves Lives).
Gun violence in America is a public health crisis, which needs to be recognized and changed by legislatures, and the voting American. As conscious Americans, we need to vote for changes to gun laws that would improve background checks nation-wide, make firearm registration mandatory, restrict the sale of assault weapons and weapon modifications that give the shooter military-grade fire power, and invest in gun-safe technology and safe firearms storage designs. This type of technology will help prevent criminally oriented people from accessing guns, and will help prevent the accidental deaths of many children by guns. This essay will explain the reforms needed to help ensure Americans can still exercise their 2nd amendment right of owning firearms, and preventing the unnecessary deaths of many Americans at the same time.
The debate over gun control in America has constantly brought up over the years due to gunmen killing large amounts of civilizations in shootings. From Columbine to Sandy Hook or the shootings of the two reporters in West Virginia, these public shootings are occurring everywhere. Lawmakers and civilians alike are pushing for increased gun control in hopes of preventing the same tragedies. Anybody that has been affected by the shootings have been pushing Congress and state governments to force new sanctions on government. With the past three years, Congress has shot down all the laws despite the large amounts of public support. Adding more gun control isn’t going to stop the mass shootings from happening.
Gun control does not only take guns away from criminals, gun control also limits law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves and their families when necessary. Those who argue for gun control usually state guns are a part of most violent crimes. However, this is not always true. While it is true that limiting gun ownership with laws could prevent individuals from possessing guns, it does not prevent people from illegally having or using guns. Those who carry guns legally are not the problem.
Making gun control more strict would involve only certain models being legal and a rigorous process to obtain a license. If America were to only allow certain models of weapons to be legal, deaths in mass murderers could be significantly reduced. According to motherjones.com, from 2011-2013, 31 of the 62 mass murders involved weapons that contained high capacity magazines, which are magazines that can carry over 10 bullets. High capacity magazines should be banned because the shooter would have to spend significantly more time loading a gun, which could spare precious seconds for people to escape. A reform of the process to obtain a license should also be changed. When people purchase guns, their activity with the gun should be closely monitored. If the Bureau of Firearms kept a close watch on people with firearms and took precautions like making people who have firearm licenses check-in and report activity of the gun’s usage, the Bureau can easily check to see if people are using their weapons correctly or if suspicious activity may be going on. A study done by economist Richard Florida showed that states like Ohio, Washington, and Nebraska have tighter gun control; in turn, they also have a lower death rate from guns (per 100,00) compared to other states. Many people will still argue that even with tighter gun laws, there will still be shootings.
Gun control is an awfully big issue in the United States today. Many people in America don’t agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns and freedom away from law-abiding citizens. Many citizens have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns aren’t very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection when used correctly. The second amendment states “the right to bear arms”; does this grant everyone the right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for the good guy average Joe to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea, and are taking part in the loss of our freedom that was given to us.
Without guns, people are assaulted daily by criminals and have no way to defend themselves. Having a gun makes a person better to protect their self and their family. Even the Constitution states that people have the right to bear arms, so the United States would be violating that if they made guns illegal. Our first president George Washington once said, “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence…” This shows that Americans need firearms because they're our form of protection and making them illegal violates the constitution. People should be required to take safety classes before purchasing a firearm because people can get hurt if they don’t know how to use them properly. The majority of gun crimes in America are involving gangsters shooting out other gangsters. An average gun owner never uses their gun to commit a crime. This means that people should have to take classes and other courses to own guns legally. According to Ammoland, “Most states issue permits to carry concealed handguns. Men and women who get permits take gun safety classes, and have extensive criminal background checks. These people make everyone a little, wherever they may be.” With that being said people do need to be able to protect themselves but they also need to know what
The second amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” With the second amendment the people can own guns and use them for protection and sport purposes.
Gun control is a very heated issue within the country. There are advocates for both sides for wanting stricter gun control and less gun control. Firearms are such a big part of American history that it has been included in our constitution as one of our inalienable rights. The people who want stricter gun control believe that making it harder to get guns and limiting the types of guns people can use makes everyone safer since there’s less firearms in the public. Those who want more lax gun laws believe that it acts as a deterrent and as a safety measure to protect innocent citizens and themselves. As with most gun control debates there is always a lot of statistics involved in the argument. Taking a look at numbers helps to see if gun control laws are effective or not. The argument for more lax gun control laws makes more sense and has the statistics to back it up.
Listverse,. '10 Arguments For Gun Control - Listverse '. N.p., 2014. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.