More handpicked essays just for you.
How to address the issue of bullying
How to address the issue of bullying
How to address the issue of bullying
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Cyberbullying: Cruel Intentions With the click of a mouse, the press of a button, words you have written can never be taken back. Due to the advancement of technology and rise of social networking sites, ways to communicate have become so instant. Before technology was reached out to children, schoolyard bullying was more common. Now adolescents use technology to purposely and repeatedly harass, threat, or cyberbully someone just by sitting behind a computer. With the growth of technology, cyberbullying has magnified greater than ever before. The first amendment creates legal, philosophical and practical problems for parents and administrators to help prevent and take action against those who have harmed others with cyberbullying. The video, Cyberbullying: Cruel Intentions, discusses the techniques in which cyberbullies use. In the video, an experiment was held including, nine teen girls divided into three groups as well as a group of older teen girls and boys in college within a span of three days. The purpose of the experiment was to analyze the techniques and ways the teens used the technology provided to them: a cell phone, a computer, and a webcam. The girls did not know each other, all were either honor students, home schooled or have been recognized by the honor society of a prestige college. The experiment was supervised and analyzed by a few Brigham Young University child development researchers. The experiment divided the girls up into three separate rooms, they were all able to talk to one another through chat rooms, instant messaging, text messaging, video chats, social media sites, and phone calls. The conversations started off harmless but escalated within moments. Snide comments became attacks, one group of gir... ... middle of paper ... ... Prince, who also took her life due to harassment, threats and constant bullying for being simply the new girl who dated the senior and other victims, with a vigorous debate over what role school officials can and should play in protecting students prohibiting this type of speech. Yet when school authorities try to control cyberbullying they are often breaking the students’ First Amendment Rights. These actions are not supported under the First amendment. Therefore, school authorities must be careful when regulating student speech. If a students’ actions were punished yet the actions were committed outside of school, without the use of school devices and are not deemed appropriate to be disciplined by the school that is a violation of the student’s First Amendment rights (Byars, 1966). Such punishment by school authorities make them liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Over five years have passed since high school senior Joseph Frederick was suspended for 10 days by school principal Deborah Morse after refusing her request to take down a 14-foot banner he was displaying at a school-sanctioned event which read “BONG HiTS 4 JESUS.” Born as a seemingly trivial civil lawsuit in which Frederick sued the school for violating his First Amendment rights to free speech, the case made its way up to the U.S. Supreme Court, and the long-awaited ruling of Morse v. Frederick has finally been released. In a 5-4 split decision, the court ruled in favor of Morse and upheld the school board’s original ruling that Morse was acting within her rights and did not violate Frederick’s First Amendment rights by taking away his banner and suspending him for 10 days. The controversial decision has led followers of the case to question the future of student speech rights.
This is a case of great importance because it addresses the issue of the broadness of the First Amendment as well as student’s freedom of speech rights being limited based on vicinity and because they are students. From this case it can be concluded that the courts were indecisive in their decision making process and that they will continue to interpret the First Amendment to their suiting and not as it is written. Finally, schools do need to have the right to enforce policies that are beneficial to the students.
Furthermore, the opinion of the Supreme Court reveled that students can express their opinions anywhere even when the principal clearly made a rule banning armbands so problems would not be created. The disruptions from armbands could ca...
On the other hand, students have the right to speak out for what they believe in without having any interference; they have the right to voice their opinion. This protection is all due to the first amendment protection. The first amendment protects the students and also the teachers’ freedom of speech, that includes during and out of school. With the protection of the first amendment no person is able to violate your right to freedom of speech. Any pers...
First Amendment Rights of Public School Students How the judicial branch rules in cases relating to the 1st and how they relate that to all the rights of public school students. This includes anything from flag burning to not saluting the flag to practicing religion in school. The main point of this paper is to focus on the fact that schools have a greater ability to restrict speech than government. Research Question Does government or school districts have the ability to restrict free speech? This is a very important question because this gives great power to one over the other.
School for students should be a safe place to learn, grow, and develop into impeccable human beings. Bullying has been a major problem for years. As times have changed, and technology has taken over. Bullying has become harsher, and dangerous. Students have more ways to when it comes to bullying, with endless options. Cyberbullying in Michigan has become more of an issue over the years, leading to serious crime offenses. Since technology isn’t going anywhere, this offense will only advance. After careful review of Lamphere School District policy’s, student handbooks and Michigan state laws and policies have a great affect with the First Amendment on cyberbullying.
Approximately 83% (5 out of 6) of all males have never been a victim of cyberbullying. This evidence helps explain why schools should not limit students’ online speech because the majority of the students are not affected by cyberbullying, making no reason for new reinforcements on the students. In document D, the court sided with the students, but the students must serve ten days, but the ten day suspension will not be shown on their records. It must pose a threat, there was no threat so they sided with the students.
Students’ rights in schools are limited or just taken away. Kids are forced to do whatever the officials at their school, either the principal or the teachers, tell the students to do. One of the main right that gets taken away or limited is students’ first amendment rights, which is the freedom of expression. Students can gets suspended by just doing things the staff at the school does not like, including saying things that they don 't like or supporting a religion that the school does not support. Also, if something is said about the school or the people attending the school is said on social media that student can also get in a lot of trouble. Students should be able to have more first amendment
At a national and international level, cyberbullying is growing substantially due to the evolution of communication through technology. Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Calussi, P. (2011) state that at a less severe level of cyberbullying, adolescent victims are experiencing silent/prank calls and insults on instant messaging. However, at a severe level of cyberbullying, unpleasant photos or videos are being shared online through social media websites with the intent of harming and harassing the victim. Cyberbully provides an insight on these different levels of cyberbullying by sharing the story of a teenage girl named Taylor Hillridge. For Taylor’s birthda...
This sort of phenomenon makes major headlines regularly in recent times and effects a clear majority of today’s youth. State and local lawmakers have taken steps to prevent this type of bullying by making illegal under several criminal law codes. Michele Hamm, a researcher in pediatrics explained, “There were consistent associations between exposure to cyberbullying and increased likelihood of depression.” Cyberbullying became widespread among students with the rapid growth in use of cellular devices and the Internet. With this kind of technology bullies have the ability to send harmful messages to their recipients at any given time. This type of bullying is the hardest to control because it involves students but often happens off school grounds. However, because the evidence is material, students and parents could bring this evidence to the school and local police departments if a situation were to happen. Parents should be mindful of their child’s use of the internet and electronic messaging, cyberbullying usually takes place in a medium in which adults are seldom present (Mason, 2008). Also, instead of sending direct messages to other students, bullies use platforms such as social media and anonymous blogs to post harmful things for others to see. Educators must understand the significance of social media use to their students, especially
All around the United States, the prevalence of cyberbullying ranges from 10-40% of people who get bullied through electronics. Furthermore, this is a problem caused by kids, teens, and adults who target one another online by repeating harmful threats and harassments. This conflict negatively impacts the victims’ life which is why anyone who cyberbullies should pay the consequences and be prosecuted.
Because cyberbullying is a relatively new phenomenon, there is some degree of variance in its definition. In its early inception, cyberbullying was thought to be limited to the internet. However, the rapid creation of new technology tolls has expanded the boundaries to include cell phones, instant messaging, chat rooms, and email (Campfield, 2006). Campfield (2006) conducted a study of middle school students to determine the incidence rates of cyberbullying. She found that nearly 70% of students were involved in cyberbullying in some capacity, as a bully or victim. In a similar study, Li (2007) found that 39% of students have been involved in cyberbullying, while 52% were aware of a peer being harassed through electronic m...
Cyberbullying is a new form of bullying that follows students from the hallways of their schools to the privacy of their homes. Many victims of cyberbullying are bullied 4 from the moment they wake up and check their cell phone or e-mail, to the time they go to bed and shut off their computer or cell phone. Cyberbullying is bullying or harassment that happens online and more difficult to stop because you need to have all the evidence saved to prove it happened. Cyberbullying is nothing to mess around with if a kid is being cyberbullied you need to get that taking care of before it gets any worse.
What is Cyber bullying? Cyber bullying is just like regular bullying but instead of bullying face to face, it’s done on the internet. In America, cyber bullying has gotten out of hand during the past year. Unfortunately kids who are bullied through the internet have a difficult time getting away from the bullying. Children today walk the street while thinking or knowing they will get picked on. This has also caused teens to commit suicide. Usually teens that are the bullies have a lower self-esteem than the person they’re bulling. Teens today use the internet more than anything excluding sleep. In two thousand and eight young teens ages 12-17 had access to the internet. Cyber bullying needs to stop before more of our children hurt themselves. Studies show that most likely a female would be the most bullied. A high percent of teens have been angry, frustrated, sad, embarrassed, scared and shockingly a small percent weren't even bothered.
...ality of cyberbullying laws: keeping the online playground safe for both teens and free speech." Vanderbilt Law Review Apr. 2010: 845+. LegalTrac. Web. 15 Nov. 2014 .