Argumentative Essay On Cyber Bullying

1013 Words3 Pages

Cyberbullying: Cruel Intentions With the click of a mouse, the press of a button, words you have written can never be taken back. Due to the advancement of technology and rise of social networking sites, ways to communicate have become so instant. Before technology was reached out to children, schoolyard bullying was more common. Now adolescents use technology to purposely and repeatedly harass, threat, or cyberbully someone just by sitting behind a computer. With the growth of technology, cyberbullying has magnified greater than ever before. The first amendment creates legal, philosophical and practical problems for parents and administrators to help prevent and take action against those who have harmed others with cyberbullying. The video, Cyberbullying: Cruel Intentions, discusses the techniques in which cyberbullies use. In the video, an experiment was held including, nine teen girls divided into three groups as well as a group of older teen girls and boys in college within a span of three days. The purpose of the experiment was to analyze the techniques and ways the teens used the technology provided to them: a cell phone, a computer, and a webcam. The girls did not know each other, all were either honor students, home schooled or have been recognized by the honor society of a prestige college. The experiment was supervised and analyzed by a few Brigham Young University child development researchers. The experiment divided the girls up into three separate rooms, they were all able to talk to one another through chat rooms, instant messaging, text messaging, video chats, social media sites, and phone calls. The conversations started off harmless but escalated within moments. Snide comments became attacks, one group of gir... ... middle of paper ... ... Prince, who also took her life due to harassment, threats and constant bullying for being simply the new girl who dated the senior and other victims, with a vigorous debate over what role school officials can and should play in protecting students prohibiting this type of speech. Yet when school authorities try to control cyberbullying they are often breaking the students’ First Amendment Rights. These actions are not supported under the First amendment. Therefore, school authorities must be careful when regulating student speech. If a students’ actions were punished yet the actions were committed outside of school, without the use of school devices and are not deemed appropriate to be disciplined by the school that is a violation of the student’s First Amendment rights (Byars, 1966). Such punishment by school authorities make them liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Open Document