Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Are law enforcement cameras an invasion of privacy
Body cameras on police essay
Research paper of police officers and body cameras
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Are law enforcement cameras an invasion of privacy
The New age of enforcement: Police and body cameras.
Did you know that first large police force to actually use body cameras was back in 2010? (Griffith, 87) This large police force was one of the first police departments to recognize the benefit of Body Cameras. This large police force is from California in the big town of Oakland. This police force used to be inexperienced with cameras. Now five years of experience the Oakland police force is one of the best police forces in the nation. While there is a lot of discussion out whether police should be required to wear cameras, history, polices safety, recent insistences, companies, untrustworthy officer, and technology suggest, the requirement be approved.
Imagine if there was a body cameras
…show more content…
at the Boston massacre. Wouldn’t that solve the problem of the American wanting war? It would have showed the British that America did not want them. With a body camera in the midst of the Massacre it would provide more evidence to that America did not want another country ruling their country. My teacher Mrs. King taught me about this topic. I remember her telling us about the trial afterwards about the men who shot the innocent people in Boston. With this camera evidence of this crime we would be able to see both sides of the conflict. Since we would be able to see the sides of the conflict the men that shot the people of Boston would have been fairly judged. With cops this whole incident applies. The Onion.com says that when we get to look through that camera you get to see the both sides of the scene. (www.theonion.com) “If a citizen knows the officer is wearing a camera, chances are the citizen will behave a little better." (Timothy B lee) As Mr. Lee says body cameras make officer better act better and protect them. Just think if you were getting recorded on stage or just being recorded out of the blue. Wouldn’t you try to behave the best you can. These incidents also happens in the camera pictures. How often has your friend taken a picture of you that looks dumb, stupid or just plain ugly? It happens a lot! Then your friend and you get in fight and you eventually delete the phot or picture. Everyone wants to look good in front of the camera. Another reason why cameras help people stay in line is they know the consequences of shooting that officer. When people see the camera on the officer they definitely know that the police department has hard core evidence that a person assaulted them. Therefore when an officer wears this body camera it does not just provided evidence for crimes it saves shootings happening by preventing them. Without body cameras, the evidence that we would not have collected would be astounding.
(Wendell Gillard) Body cameras play a big role in today recent incidents. “I was scared to death. The last thought I had go through my mind when I pulled the trigger, and I'll never forget this … was that I was too late. I was too late. And because of that, I was going to get killed. Worse, my (partner) was going to get killed” said Officer Brian Cruz (KSl.com) This beloved incident happened in our beloved Utah. This incident happened in Utah right outside of the 7/11. The officer (Brian Cruz) asked a few men to put their hands up in their because of believed weapon possession. The two men that were their put their hands up in the air but one just walked away from the officer. The officer asked the guy many times to get his hands up the guy would not. Officer reacted quickly to the guy and shot him. Luckily this whole incident was recorded on his body camera. His body camera was used when the guy family tried to sue the police force. With this hard video tape evidence the officer did not try guilty and it was proven to do it for the safety of him and others. Another incident this January happened where a car was overturned and fell into a river. This crash was unnoticed until a local fisherman 24hours later noticed the car. This local fisherman called the police to tell them about the car. When the police came the discovered a baby in it and a mother. They knew the mother was dead, but the baby was alive and crying. The police man were rushed once figuring out the baby was alive. After 5 minutes of pushing the police man were able to grab the baby and run to the ambulance. This story became a miracle to everybody around the world. People started calling the baby miracle baby. Luckily the police men were wearing body cameras to film what had happened. With this body camera people were able to know the whole story of the baby Lilly. The public through the camera was able to
benefit and get info for from it. The last and final example of took place last September. When neighbors called the police on him. The neighbors called on him because of some unexpecting things that he was doing. A police man came up to him after the call and asked him several questions. Then this angry person hit him with his shovel. Then the officer started firing at him. This officer was not pressed charges but was saved again by the body camera he had. As you can see recent instances have shown that cameras need to be on police officers. Companies now have been using cameras for a long, just take a look outside of your local grocery store, and I am sure you can find one. Companies are starting to make the change with cameras in general especially grocery stores. Have you ever seen a person attempt to steal something from a store? That was valuable? That rarely happens to stores with cameras. Companies are now realizing what it is taking to catch the thieves. According, to shoplifting.org “ More than 10 million people have been caught shoplifting in the last five years.” See how many people are caught stealing each year. That is a lot of people! See with cameras all around stores you can catch shoplifters. Now that is why police need body cameras to catch the bad guys. Have you ever had the experience of dealing with untrustworthy person? It is Painful! “When you put a camera on a police officer, they tend to behave a little better, follow the rules a little better and follow the rules. (Timothy B lee) If you are being filmed all day wouldn’t you try to be your best, and look good in front of the camera? Instead of an officer purchasing donuts and sacking out in their car. An officer knows that their being watched so they should behave a lot better than usual. I think the Police departments with the footage should generate pay based on what the police officer is doing, with their day. Officer need these cameras to be kept in line to help the general public, with these cameras officer become trustworthy people, and agency know the true extent of their work. Technology over the years changed such that we are exploring the idea of requiring police officer to wear body cameras. Every year a new gadget comes out that makes the world a better place, except for the people who abuse the products. People who abuse these products use them to kill, to steal, to rob, and to cause harm. With the advancement of these technologies we need the police officers to step up their game in the high tech world, and fight against the new age of cybercrimes, and reality crimes. Evidently, Police cameras are worth the hassle. Police cameras need to be approved because of history would be solved if the camera was there, police safety would be higher, crime from today will go down, companies will get better technology, technology would be able to advance, and there will not be as many untrustworthy people. Support this program by having
There are topics brought up about the incident in Ferguson and other police shootings that did or did not have body cams. There have been talks in communities about trying to reduce the police misconducts in the communities and the workplace. It is proven that officers who didn’t wear body cams had 2 times the illegal use of force incidents. This article will help me prove further that body cameras being worn will help reduce so many incidents, not saying all incidents
One of the sources used to disprove that body camera isn’t the answer includes Jamelle Bouie article, Keeping the Police honest. Mr. Bouie is the chief political correspondent at Slate who graduated from the University of Virginia with a political and social thought degree (Tumblr.com). His work consists of issues relating to national politics, public policies and racial inequality. His work has also been published in Slate online magazine, the New Yorker, the Washington Post and TIME Magazine (Tumblr.com). Slate is an online magazine that post about the news, politics, business, technology and culture (slate.com). In Jamelle article, Keeping the Police honest he talks about incidents where police officers were being recorded and took excessive
Police officers with their body cameras: a history and back ground paper to answer the question if should all police officers wear body cameras, it is important to first look at the history and back ground of the topic. According to article of Journal of quantitative criminology, writers Ariel, Farrar, Sutherland, Body cameras have been given a new eye opener to people about the excessive use of force against their community members. Arial, Farrar, and Sutherland in the article state “The effect of police body warn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomize controlled trial” describe their observation as:
Police Body Cameras Due to devastating events that have occurred between policemen and civilians, law enforcements find it liable for police officers to be fitted with body cameras. In doing so it is thought to bring an increase in trust in the community, reduce brutality and crime, as well as elucidate good cops still around. I feel body cameras will bring more awareness to police departments when it comes to the honesty in their staff’s actions when they are unsupervised. They can be used as hard evidence in courtrooms, to help make the correct judgment on the situation in question.
There have been lots of modern technologies introduced in the United States of America to assist law enforcement agencies with crime prevention. But the use of body-worn cameras by police personnel brings about many unanswered questions and debate. Rising questions about the use of body cam are from concern citizens and law enforcement personnel. In this present day America, the use body cameras by all law enforcement personnel and agencies are one of the controversial topics being discussed on a daily base. Body worn cameras were adopted due to the alleged police brutality cases: for instance, the case of Michael Brown, an African-American who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 2014, Eric Garner died as a result of being put in a chokehold by a New York police officer, and John Crawford, shot and killed by a police officer at a Walmart in Beavercreek, Ohio.
Since their inception, police body cameras have been a controversial topic as many do not agree on their effectiveness and legality. To the trained eye, body cameras clearly have no negatives other than the sheer cost of their implementation. Some people, nonetheless, do believe that it is an encroachment of privacy for police to record private and/or public interactions even though it is purely legal. While that may be seen as a negative, it is wholly subjective and must be completely ignored when considering the factual analysis of police body camera use that is necessary to verify their validity. When only taking fact into account, there is no way to deny the nearly infinite benefits of body cameras.
Should police officers be mandated to wear body cameras? That is a question that has grown to be widely discussed in media, politics, and public. The death of Michael Brown due to a fatal shooting by a law enforcement officer inflamed the idea that police officers should wear body cameras (Griggs, Brandon). The opposing sides of such controversial questions both provide a strong reasonable argument that support each side. However, despite the critiques against body cameras, I believe the evidence that support the usage of body cameras to be overwhelmingly positive and the intention is of pure deeds. Police officers should be required to wear body cameras; because it will build a trust between law enforcement and the community, it will decrease
Do police officers really need body cameras is a question that has been repeated all throughout the nation. Body cameras are video recording systems that are used by law enforcement to record their interactions with the public and gather video evidence. Most police departments do not wear body cameras currently and the ones that do are in trial phases to see how it works out. There are many advantages to police officers wearing body cameras but in asking the question should they wear body cameras the stakeholders should look at the complete picture. One reason that police and body cameras have constantly been brought up lately are the instances of police brutality happening within the United States. Police brutality within the United States
Many numerous police officers have been given body cameras over the last few months. Due to this, there have been videos that were made public which caused an outcry throughout the country. With the increase in body cameras over the country, there has been many setbacks and potential benefits that
Police stations should require all police officers to wear body cameras because the cameras help solve crimes and find better evidence, it can also keep corrupt cops off the streets, and keep the city safer. First, body cameras
Wearing body cameras is the future of our police departments. The cameras can help provide evidence in many situations. In Baltimore, a police officer’s body camera caught the police officer planting drugs. Because of the body camera, the police officer was suspended. Body cameras could cause some problems though. They could
I'll persuade you that we shouldn't have cameras inside classrooms. The first reason is that kids would be watching the camera instead of learning. They would see how it looks like, and if it's a hidden camera. Then, the kids would be looking everywhere for it.
Should Police Officers be Required to Wear Body Cameras? Body cameras are small, portable electronic devices that capture audio and/or video. Although they are relatively pretty small, their power is immense. There are times when a lack of body cameras can be a matter of life and death. Having a body camera present during an encounter or altercation can save someone’s life, and not having it can do quite the opposite.
A. Thesis: Although there has been much controversy surrounding the use of body cameras, they are necessary because they can minimize the harm of innocent people, ensure accountability for the everyone involved, and help build trust in the tarnished image of law enforcement.
The force used by officers has declined 60% during the past year. The cameras were introduced and citizen complaints against officers dropped by 88%. Body camera should be used by all