More handpicked essays just for you.
Body cams on police essay
Impact of police officers wearing body cameras essay
Pros and cons of police body cameras
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Body cams on police essay
Police officer and body cameras
Police officers with their body cameras: a history and back ground paper to answer the question if should all police officers wear body cameras, it is important to first look at the history and back ground of the topic. According to article of Journal of quantitative criminology, writers Ariel, Farrar, Sutherland, Body cameras have been given a new eye opener to people about the excessive use of force against their community members. Arial, Farrar, and Sutherland in the article state “The effect of police body warn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomize controlled trial” describe their observation as: Police use-of-force continues to be a major source of international
…show more content…
The article states, “that the indiscriminate release of body camera footage could have a devastating effect on the victims of crime. Those crafting police body camera policy have to effectively balance privacy with the desire to hold police officers accountable for their actions”. However, it is against the first amendment to withhold any evidences to the …show more content…
In more extreme cases, officers may obstruct justice and lie under the oath to save themselves or a fellow officer from discipline and prosecution (Holbert & Rosa 69). Despite police not taking fault in their actions and going against the oath, it gives government official a bad reputation in the moto of protecting and serving their
There have been lots of modern technologies introduced in the United States of America to assist law enforcement agencies with crime prevention. But the use of body-worn cameras by police personnel brings about many unanswered questions and debate. Rising questions about the use of body cam are from concern citizens and law enforcement personnel. In this present day America, the use body cameras by all law enforcement personnel and agencies are one of the controversial topics being discussed on a daily base. Body worn cameras were adopted due to the alleged police brutality cases: for instance, the case of Michael Brown, an African-American who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 2014, Eric Garner died as a result of being put in a chokehold by a New York police officer, and John Crawford, shot and killed by a police officer at a Walmart in Beavercreek, Ohio.
The article by Loricchio describes a story of how police issued body cameras helped keep an innocent man from going to prison. In Carroll, Taneytown a police officer was released and found not guilty after shooting and killing a drunk driver. Evidence from a camera worn by the officer helped to exonerate him (Loricchio). Police body cameras are like the dashboard cameras on police cruisers, which captures and shows the events that happened. However, body cameras have a distinct advantage over the dashboard cameras. They are able to move with the officer throughout the entire chase instead of only sitting in the car. All police officers should be required to wear body cameras. Body cameras help provide
A major issue in today’s society is police brutality. Everyday we come across videos on the internet showing policemen using excessive force on citizens and sometimes even police shooting and killing people who might seem innocent. The problem with the videos that are posted online is that they don’t show the whole story behind what is occurring and they give off a bad reputation to all cops. Body cameras for officers were first recommended in 2013 after many reports accusing officers of racial profiling and in 2014, police departments received a big federal fund in order begin equipping police officers with body cameras after many protests over a shooting of a young black teenager. Body cameras
The duties of a police officer is very important, they protect us and enforce the law. Yet over the years, many officers have taking advantage of the privilege by brutalizing citizens and many other injustice crimes which cause many riots and protests. Body cameras should be a requirement for police officer because it’ll help reduce the use of force by police officer, reduce dishonesty in reports, and condemn both police and citizens to behave.
Within recent years there has been much controversy encompassing police officers and regardless of whether they ought to wear body cameras to document all their daily activities. While the utilization of body cameras may appear to invade the public or police privacy, police should wear body cameras. By wearing body cameras, they could enhance people's perspective of police by demonstrating their compassion, protect the public from police misconduct and protect law enforcement from dealing with false allegations that can discredit their reputation. Additionally, it can help to provide evidence when individuals may not be able to, which are all vital parts of policing. Police body cameras are an indispensable device for cops and our communities
In the article, “Candid Cameras,” award-winning journalist Kevin Davis argues that police body cameras are huge assets to officers when retrieving information about their physical interactions with criminals. Davis aids his main statement when he asserts, “For police, the plus side is that cameras can improve how officers capture evidence. The camera can also provide a record of interrogations and arrests, how officers conduct themselves and what they witness at crime scenes” (15). Soon after, Davis then provides a deeper understanding as to why police body cameras benefit officers when he asserts, “It eliminates the ‘he said, she said’, and it will be easier for police to defend their conduct in the routine case” (15). These quotes do an exceptional job of showing the reader the way in which the use of police body cameras are in fact positive additions to law enforcement. In the end, police body cameras have shown to be nothing but positive additions to society as a
The use of body cameras will decrease the rates of violence, accountability for inappropriate misconduct, as well as improve the way the public view law enforcement officials. There are many benefits that come with the use of body cameras by officers. While the view on the use of body cameras by officers may be deemed as an invasion of privacy rights, the use of body cameras is an implementation to the usage for recoding audio and physical interactions between the officers and the public, assist with building trust within communities and officers, promote a safer environment for both officers and citizens, and provide evidence needed to solve a case when the witness/individual is not present (Bakardjiev, 2015). Increasing the use of body cameras by law enforcement officials will decline the rates in crimes, and citizens behavior will become positive as they view that law enforcement officers are there
The use of body cameras has been shown to have a positive effect on both police officers and the public. With many of the recent events that have happened and how the public sees the police use of force, the use of body-worn cameras the public opinion is slowly changing for the better as everyone sees how things are from an officer’s point of view. In the words of Bill Crane, a business consultant and political commentator, “police body cameras are expected to become as universal a policing tool as the side arm, nightstick or taser in the not-too-distant future”
The use of body cameras in law enforcement is an affective and useful addition to everyday equipment . Body cameras provide hard evidence, benefit officers and citezens, increase transparency and accountablity of officers, and improve overall behavior for both parties. Body cameras are wearable cameras used by law enforcement to record interactions that they make while on duty. Departments have been using body cameras for a while, but due to recent incedents more departments are putting them to use.
With advanced body camera machinery such as GoPro growing more influential in today's civilization, controversy has emerged over whether law enforcement officers should be required to utilize body cameras or not, so that each and every movement is recorded and displayed while on duty. Police should be able to have these cameras on their attire at all times, no matter where they go as long as they are in duty. This allows officers to documentate everything and, unlike human beings, the cameras do not have the ability to lie so it will protect and safeguard any incorrect allegations. This type of technology should be dispersed to police stations in every single state because as society advances progressively more into
Video evidence of police brutality and shootings have become very effective in determining exactly what took place in different types of situations that were a little complicated or some that turned fatal. “What started as an effort to capture or prevent bad police behavior, I think now we are starting to see the realities of it capturing true human suffering” (Straub). Some citizens continue to say though the body cameras help to see the full truth, the cameras will obtain every brutal action, creating even more intense grieving family members, hurt victims and stopping the citizens of freedom of speech. They are also saying that some police officers can quickly remove the camera when a sticky situation begins to occur and just claim later on that it was hit off him or her or that it had fallen. If the altercation is getting heated and all of a sudden in the video the cameras cuts off, investigators should take note of that and quickly start investigating even deeper and conclude that a coincidence like that is just entirely way too suspicious in a deadly ending. While although the citizens are crying out and complaining every chance they get, no action is being taken.
This project is based on the current research and some police department equipped with body worn video camera as a guideline. However, due to technology is too new, a large number of research institutions does not yet exist regarding the effects body-worn cameras have on policing. Further research and field experience are needed before the full impact of body worn video cameras can be understood.
If the footage taken from the body cameras is considered public record, hours of footage of innocent civilian’s interactions with the police is available. If the police enter a person's home and they are wearing a body camera, this can show private information and possibly reveal embarrassing things to the public. Many people have been worried about the kind of surveillance measures that the government use with the types of technology. One major issue people have is when should the police officers have their body cameras turned on because there are many instances involving personal cases such as domestic violence and rape cases. Footage from the dash-cam on the police cars have been exploited for many years for entertainment purposes. There have been many times that dash-cam videos have been posted on entertainment websites such as Youtube and TMZ have exposed many people during these interactions with the police. If officers wear body cameras, this could put the public eye into someone's living room or bedroom. With all these challenges, there has been no policy regarding the body cameras. In a survey for 63 law enforcement agencies regarding body cameras said “nearly a third of the agencies had no written policy on the devices.” Most of these agencies are just putting body
Stanley, Jay. "Accountability vs. Privacy: The ACLU's Recommendations on Police Body Cameras." American Civil Liberties Union. N.p., 09 Oct. 2013. Web. 15 May 2014.
In this world, almost everything revolves around technology. Many gadgets were created and to this day they all have been modified. For example, if you were to Google ‘when was the first computer created,’ you will find out that it first started in 1943, and then finally completed in 1946. It has been 70 years since the first computer was made. Articles say that the first computer weighed about 50 tons. In this current year, a regular computer can weigh just a little less or a little more than a 100 pounds; of course depending what kind of system you would be getting. Joseph Nicephore Niepce was the first person who first used a camera in 1827. Video cameras have been around for a few decades, but they have quickly evolved. In 1982, Sony released