Argument Essay: At The Holocaust Museum

At the Holocaust Museum Argument Essay

One of the most tragic human events in the history of the world is the Holocaust. The articles that are written about the Holocaust, objective or subjective, can have a big impact on the reader. The texts about the Holocaust that focuses on an objective way informs the reader of facts. However, texts about the Holocaust that focuses on a subjective way may impact the reader emotionally. Objective and subjective writing can impact the way a reader understands these historical events in the world! The article, At the Holocaust Museum, presents information about the Holocaust in a objective way.

The information in At the Holocaust Museum is more objective than subjective. In the article, the author states,

“Making sure the world knows exactly what happened to these 50 Jewish prisoners, and to the 6 million Jews and other victims who were systematically exterminated by Nazi Germany during World War II, is the mission of the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C.” This piece of evidence shows more objectivity than subjectivity because the author expresses that the Holocaust Memorial Museum's mission is to have the world understand what happened to people during World War II by the Nazi Germany.

The author included statistics and facts that clearly states the number of Jewish prisoners, and victims their were. He also had connoted words that were used such as exactly, victims, systematically, exterminated, and mission. This piece of evidence proves that this example is objective because it is a true fact with support. “Students pause to watch videos of Hitler addressing huge rallies, declaring that "cleansing" the nation of Jews and other "undesirables," such as Gypsies, and the handicapped, will make Germany great again.” In another example, the author states that students watch videos of Hitler saying that getting rid of the Jews and Gypsies would make Germany great again at the Holocaust Museum. This shows objectivity because connotative words such as “cleansing” as if he wanted to clear the nation of Jews and “undesirables” can make a huge impact on the

reader. “The first phase of the Final Solution involved herding Jews into "ghettos," where they were isolated from the non-Jewish population.” The last example that shows objectivity is when the author proclaimed that the Final Solution was when the Nazis planned to kill all Jews in lands under German control. They gathered all the Jews into ghettos and they were excluded from the other Germans, or non Jewish people. This shows an unbiased evident because strong powerful words such as herding and isolated can influence the reader. This analysis proves that this quote from the text is open minded because it is a accurate fact with support. The evidence above concludes that this article, At the Holocaust Museum, is primarily objective than subjective. Objective information is completely unbiased. There is usually a feeling of the writer being outside of the information, and when they present it, they do it without revealing their feelings in connection to that information.

Although it was more objective, the author wanted to also appeal to the reader emotionally.

In the first analysis, the author states, “You get the feeling that you're trapped, that something bad is about to happen.” In this example, the author puts the reader in second person. It is a different point of view where the author uses words such as you, or your’e. He has figurative language in this example, and in this case, it is identified as a metaphor, whereas the author describes the action in a way that isn't completely true, but can help explain an idea or make a comparison. The author uses words that really pop out to the reader such as trapped. This analysis or evidence proves that this example is subjective because it can propose to the reader’s emotional level. “For many of the students who have passed through the exhibition, the distant historical world contained in the photo of corpses that greeted them by the elevators has been brought to life.” In another example, the author describes that the historical world in photos of corpses had “greeted” them by the elevators been “brought back to life”. As you can see here, the author clearly has another form of figurative language here, and it is classified as personification. The author clearly states that the corpses, which means dead bodies, “greeted” and was “brought back to life”, and he was using personification to describe it so that readers can more easily understand it. “They cautiously enter the car, touching

the scratches on the bare wooden walls, imagining the terror of being locked inside.” In the last piece of evidence, the author uses words such as cautiously, bare, and terror to describe that feeling when they (classmates from San Francisco) were entering the car. The author wanted to make a realistic but detailed perspective on what they were going through. The subjective facts stated above, no matter if the article was generally objective, has an emotional appeal to the reader. Subjective information is considered to be a single person’s opinion. It has a viewpoint, or possibly a bias piece of information.

After the evaluation of the information provided in At the Holocaust Museum, it is clear that the text is mainly more objective. By observing the perspective of informational articles, it is important when establishing an opinion about a topic. If a reader does not completely analyze all the possible perspectives and severely estimate the possible bias that exists in a piece of writing, they will possibly be misguided about the topic they are learning about.