Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
On my first son character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: On my first son character analysis
In the novel Fathers and Sons by Ivan Turgenev, Arcady plays a major role both in his own life and the lives of others. Arcady, despite the shield he surrounds himself with, is not a true Nihilist like his friend Bazarov through his thoughts and actions we see his change. To begin, Arcady shows signs of Romanticism Early on in the novel despite the announcement of his Nihilist beliefs. For example, Bazarov and Arcady were walking one afternoon in the garden and overheard Nicholas playing his cello.
"At that instant the lingering notes of a 'cello were wafted towards them from the house . . . and, like honey, the melody flowed through the air" (49). Like a true Nihilist, Bazarov immediately denounced the act of playing music as a purely romantic institution. "Good Lord!
At forty-four, a pater familias, in the province of X, playing the 'cello! Bazarov continued to laugh: but, on this occasion, Arcady, though he venerated his mentor, did not even smile" (50). By this we see that although Arcady looks up to Bazarov, he truly does not uphold the Nihilist beliefs as strongly or as strictly. His acceptance of his father's cello playing shows that Arcady, unlike Bazarov.
does not find music a purely romantic institution, but an enjoyable way to be merry. Also this incident shows us that Arcady does not like when others poke fun at his family. Here, he obviously does not think his father's cello playing is a laughing matter.Secondly, Nihilist ideas included...
...epiction of literary ridicule and gentle mockery. Nemerov’s usage of a whimsical tone of gentle mockery is created to support the theme of how life cannot be singularly contained within the academic world.
One form of art which is predominant in The Awakening is piano playing. Piano playing symbolizes a woman’s role in society. In Edna’s society, artistic skill, such as piano playing and sketching, were accomplishments which ladies acquired. They were merely enhancements to their education, not possibilities for occupation. Women artists, whether they were musicians, painters, or writers, had a difficult time being accepted in society (Dyer 86). Kate Chopin presents two women who are foils to Edna: Madame Ratignolle and Mademoiselle Reisz (Koloski 117). Both of these women play the piano; however, their purpose and motivations are vastly different. The way in which they view their piano playing reflects their values.
The thesis of Kimberley Hearne’s essay “Fitzgerald’s Rendering of a Dream” is at the end of the first paragraph and reads “It is through the language itself, and the recurrent romantic imagery, that Fitzgerald offers up his critique and presents the dream for what it truly is: a mirage that entices us to keep moving forward even as we are ceaselessly borne back into the past (Fitzgerald 189).” Hearne’s essay provides information on the misconception of The American Dream that Fitzgerald conveys through “The Great Gatsby”. She provides countless evidence that expresses Fitzgerald’s view of The American Dream, and explains that Fitzgerald’s writing of the novel is to express to Americans what The American Dream truly is.
Lermontov sets forth his philosophy of fate through the protagonist, in the novel, A Hero of Our Time. Pechorin’s cynical, ambitious, adventurous and irresponsible characteristics draw us down his inevitable and destructive path of fate as it also plays itself out in his relationship with women. The personality and characteristic of the protagonist, Pechorin, is imperative in clarifying and appealing the concept of fate of the author - Lermontov. Pechorin is a character that possesses the fate of the Russian generation and the one of Lermontov.
...l […] his passing from one world into another” (542). Without Raskolnikov’s relationship with Sonia it would have been impossible for him to become this new man, to convert to Christian existentialism and find happiness and meaning in life.
Set in late nineteenth century Russia, The Brothers Karamazov recounts the history of Karamazov family, a lineage infamous for drunkenness, thievery, lust, and the like. Toward the beginning of the novel, it is discovered that the oldest brother, Dmitri, has troubles with his father, Fyodor, concerning a mutual lover, Grushenka. This tension transpires into physical brawls between Dmitri and Fyodor, warranting responses from the other two Karamazov brothers. The youngest brother and a pious monk, Alyosha strives to be a mediator between his obscene father and aggressive brother. The middle brother and a skeptic, Ivan is indifferent to the situation; his disbelief in human morality doesn’t warrant any attention toward his family’s troubles.
Rivers, J.E., Charles Nicol. Nabokov's Fifth Arc: Nabokov and Others on his Life's Work. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1982.
The impact of Kate Chopin’s novel, The Awakening, on society resulted in her ruin, both literary and social. Reviewers called it vulgar, improper, unhealthy, and sickening. One critic said that he wished she had never written it, and another wrote that to truly describe the novel would entail language not fit for publication (Stipe 16). The overwhelming condemnation of the entire book rather than just Edna’s suicide seems surprising in light of her successful short story career. The themes that Chopin explores in her novel are present in both Bayou Folk and A Night in Acadie, her short story collections published before The Awakening, and the other short stories she published separately. The only reasonable explanation is that people misinterpreted Chopin’s short stories about male/female relationships as sentimental and witty stories rather than serious condemnations of the social order that left women so little choice while giving men little restriction. This misinterpretation even occurs today. In classes I have taken that cover Chopin, many students and instructors read her short stories as romance, as celebrations of motherhood, and as empowerment of the matriarchy, yet they read The Awakening and recognize Chopin’s criticism of society without seeing any serious contradiction in their earlier readings of her short stories. However, the overwhelming pattern in Chopin’s fiction seems to either satirize or undermine the worlds of her characters. One way in which she does this is through point of view. A look at this technique reveals the genesis of The Awakening in even the earliest of her published fiction dealing with male/female sexual relationsh...
He lives in the “now” of time, he doesn’t reach out to process the future. There are plenty of examples of Odysseus in these kind of situations, but one that causes the biggest dilemma is when Odysseus gets home and slaughters all of the suitors. Odysseus was so over the top with his emotions, he didn’t bother to think about what would happen if he killed over a hundred of the richest upper classmen in Ithaca. Although Odysseus did think ahead when he was stranded on Phaeacia. In book 5, lines 515-523, he thought about where he should sleep that would keep him the safest: “Man of misery, what next? Is this the end? If I wait out a long tense night by the banks, I fear the sharp frost and the soaking dew together will do me in - I’m bone-weary, about to breathe my last, and a cold wind blows from a river on toward morning. But what if I climb that slope, go for the dark woods and bed down in the thick brush? What if I’m spared the chill, fatigue, and a sweet sleep comes my way? I fear wild beasts will drag me off as quarry.”(1) In this quote, Odysseus is debating about where the safest place for him to sleep would be. He thinks about the outcome of both situations and considers what he could do to make either one less dangerous for himself. Unfortunately, he does this a little too late and even though he does save himself, his crew is still dead. If he were to be a little more considerate about dangers a little sooner he might not even be in the spot he was in now. He easily could’ve made it home by then and none of the troubles yet to come would have even happened. Odysseus was not bothered by the future on any level which is one of the main reasons that he was done wrong multiple times. Odysseus had no reason to actually kill the suitors either. While it is true that they overstayed their welcome tremendously and
There was a strong reaction to Fathers and Sons, and many of the nihilists condemned Turgenev for creating an inaccurate caricature of a nihilist. However, Turgenev had never meant Bazarov to defame the nihilist, he meant Bazarov to represent good. Turgenev based him on observations and conceived of him as a tragic figure, this was misinterpreted by many young radicals as an indictment. Turgenev wrote in response to a young poet's misinterpretation of Bazarov, "I wanted to make a tragic character out of him: there was no room in this case for gentleness. He's honest, truthful, and a democrat through and through-and you don't find any good sides to him?" Turgenev continues to explain that he has not been understood. "My entire tale is directed against the gentry as a progressive class. Take a close look at the characters of Nikolai, Pavel, and Arkady. Weakness and flabbiness or limitations. Aesthetic considerations made me take the specifically good representatives of the gentry so as to prove my point more surely; if the cream is only this good, what does that imply about the milk?
¬Obsolete ideas are outdated and archaic ideas of life that are no longer relevant in their respective societies but nonetheless are still followed by a few. Though they have lost absolute value in society, people still cling on to them with a strong vehemence. Ibsen and Chekov expose the flaws of the societies they come from, intending to raise awareness in the societies. The purpose of these plays could be to let us know the old and traditional views of the commoners and the laymen of Europe. Both authors use a single family as an attempt to reflect the microscopic changes occurring in society to a macroscopic level. Hence, the households of Mrs. Ranevsky and Mrs. Alving can be perceived as a microcosm of Russia and Norway at that time.
American Modernism was a period of time between 1900 and 1960 when new ideas in art, music, and literature emerged as America transitioned into a booming urban nation. These ideas shifted the way people thought and acted, and sparked new ways of writing. A concept very important to Literary Modernism is individualism. Individualism regards the beliefs, needs, well being, and accomplishments of a single person over those of other individuals and of society. This ties into the Modernist theme of valorization of the individual. By trusting themselves and not conforming to others, characters are heroic in the face of a future they can't control. Individualism and Modernism, together, inspired and continue to inspire the writings of the past, present, and future. The individualistic characteristics in Self-Reliance, The Great Gatsby, and True Grit, indicate their link to Modernism. These works from before, during, and after Modernism, capture an essential and foundational attribute to the period. Individualism played a huge part in the writings of Modernism and the modernist view of the individual.
There are many themes in the later part of the book. In chapter 15 for the first time, see Bazarov in an uncomfortable situation around Madame Odintsova. This shocks Arkady as he has never seen his friend act like this before. Continuing in chapter 17 Bazarov begins to develop feelings for Madame Odintsova which he struggles with because it conflicts with his ideology of nihilism. This conflict is noticed by Arkady, who starts to lose faith in his friend.
The protagonists of the novel, Arkady and Bazarov, are two graduates who return to their homes wrapped up in new, inflexible philosophical views meant to give sense to their meanings and to bring enlightenment to the “ignorant” old generation represented by their parents. However, age is the only thing that unifies the two characters. Thus, they represent the young, enthusiastic generation that wants arduously to build its place in the world and to prove that it is better than the previous “backward” generation. Nevertheless, Arkady and Bazarov portray two completely different personalities. Bazarov is a simple but strong and self-confident character who is indifferent towards the emotional and spiritual world. He promotes the nihilism current, putting value in concrete, objective things rather than abstract ones. He states about Arkady’s father that he “wastes his time reading poetry,” and claims that “a good chemist is twenty times as useful as any poet.” In addition, he thinks of the old generation as being composed of “old idealists” who believe in romanticism and foolery. On the contrary, Arkady represents a simple but weak and uncertain character. He follows his great nihilist friend blindly promoting the belief in nothing and the skeptical analysis ...
The play centers on the life and estate of Lubov Ranevskya, a middle-aged woman of land-owning lineage. She is extremely emotional and allows her feelings to guide her decisions. As a result, she is generous and even frivolous with her money, giving her an incredible debt. Mme. Ranevskaya's brother Gayev is just as emotional as his sister is; however, he possesses a certain intellectual prowess that Lubov lacks. Both characters exhibit Lubov's tragic flaw: they must continually re-strain themselves from over-expression of their feelings. Another significant character is Lopahin, a local merchant who was raised a peasant but has since acquired much wealth. While the reader enjoys his optimism and respects his business ways, it is tragic that Lopahin sees only the monetary value rather than the sentimental. Lopahin's character is the opposite of Mme. R., and the reader is just as ambivalent toward both. It is also regrettable that almost every character finds his satisfaction fro...