Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature:Literary Devices
Literature:Literary Devices
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Set in late nineteenth century Russia, The Brothers Karamazov recounts the history of Karamazov family, a lineage infamous for drunkenness, thievery, lust, and the like. Toward the beginning of the novel, it is discovered that the oldest brother, Dmitri, has troubles with his father, Fyodor, concerning a mutual lover, Grushenka. This tension transpires into physical brawls between Dmitri and Fyodor, warranting responses from the other two Karamazov brothers. The youngest brother and a pious monk, Alyosha strives to be a mediator between his obscene father and aggressive brother. The middle brother and a skeptic, Ivan is indifferent to the situation; his disbelief in human morality doesn’t warrant any attention toward his family’s troubles. …show more content…
One evening, Fyodor is murdered, and authorities immediately place the blame on Dmitri due to their apprehension of the fighting that occurred. After a tumultuous trial, Dmitri is found guilty of all counts and is sentenced to the mines. Though, at the end of the story, the Karamazov dynasty continues to be tainted by an immoral father, Dmitri’s redemption into a new man coupled with Alyosha’s unending kindness begin to shape a new name for the Karamazov legacy. Initially torn between conflicting wills, Dmitri learns to accept suffering, translating to a unified will to practice morality. Early on, Dmitri is described as an impulsive man, one who acts rashly without consideration for others. Nevertheless, it is also written that Dmitri finds himself yearning to live an honest and moral life, a life absent of recklessly harming others. Evidence of these conflicting wills is exemplified through Dmitri’s secret visit to Fyodor’s house on the night of Fyodor’s murder. As Fyodor heedlessly leans out the window, hoping to spot Grushenka, Dmitri’s evil will realizes the perfect moment to kill his father. He understands that killing his father would solve a plethora of problems; he could retrieve the inheritance from his mother and take Grushenka for his own. However, Dmitri’s goodwill prevents him from killing his father. Later on, this goodwill grows and matures as Dmitri is questioned and put on trial for his father’s murder, eventually overtaking his immorality. Upon realizing he will be convicted of his father’s murder, Dmitri decides to use his suffering and misfortune in prison to resurrect a fiery passion for God and a deeper love for his family and loved ones, leading to a unified will for good. Throughout the novel, free will is vilified by skeptics and praised by believers.
Of the many examples of free will’s dangers in the novel, perhaps the most memorable concerns Ivan’s poem The Grand Inquisitor. This inciteful work argues that Jesus’ failure to follow Satan’s three temptations is what landed humankind with free will’s curse. The Inquisitor suggests that humankind naturally desires security found in an accepted truth. However, Christ failed to demonstrate his divinity when Satan gave him the opportunity, and this failure entailed confusion amongst humankind concerning Christ’s authenticity. The Inquisitor argues that this lack of clarity ushered in free will, as humankind is plagued with choosing between a host of securities hoping the selected one is right. To find a seemingly non-existent security, humankind selfishly latches onto to objectives other than Christ, such as money and fame, to leading to a will to do evil. However, the novel succeeds in mentioning the true meaning of free will: to desire God’s love out of true faith. God didn’t create free will to cause confusion in the world but rather to determine if humanity truly loved Him. Using Alyosha as an example, his unwavering faith in God doesn’t come forcefully from a place of obligation but rather a place of desiring to live a life for God. Free will isn’t a curse to Alyosha, but it is a way for him to demonstrate his true faith in
God. Despite its antiquity, The Brothers Karamazov continues to prevail as one of the greatest works of literature in history, as it succeeds in effectively using amiable characters to provide truths about humanity that still ring true today. One of the most prominent examples displaying the novel’s success consists of Dmitri’s use of free will to overcome his evil will. Dmitri’s first description in the novel concerning his conflicting wills resonates with most readers, as everyone is plagued with conflicting wills: a will for good and a will for evil. However, Dmitri’s restoration into a new, moral man succeeds to convince the reader that this transformation can happen to anybody. One of many, Dmitri’s relatability coupled with a vital truth about humanity’s free will contributes to the novel’s success.
The short story, “Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka and His Aunt”, explicates the life of a man named Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka. We see him briefly in his young years, followed by his life in the army, and his return to the farm where his strong characterized aunt resides. We can see immediately that this man lives in constant cleanliness and dutiful paranoia; these are some of his desires that he wishes to exhibit to others. We can also see his fears, which reside in the confiscation of his masculinity and independence. This short story has many elements that resemble others in the Nikolai Gogol collection.
“He has finally learned to love big brother” was how George Orwell in his novel 1984 described Winston, conversion to the party are represented by big brother at the end of the novel. It is easy to believe that at this instance, after torturous reeducation that Winston has endured, he has lost free will and no longer be able to freely choose to love big brother but was forced to, against hiss will. Therefore Winston was never free to love big brother, and in fact not free at all after his “reeducation.” But if we are to accept a definition of free will that stipulates that we are able to produce and act on our own volitions we must accept that Winston has retained and has chosen to love big brother out of his own free will.
Dostoyevsky's writing in this book is such that the characters and setting around the main subject, Raskolnikov, are used with powerful consequences. The setting is both symbolic and has a power that affects all whom reside there, most notably Raskolnikov. An effective Structure is also used to show changes to the plot's direction and Raskolnikov's character. To add to this, the author's word choice and imagery are often extremely descriptive, and enhance the impact at every stage of Raskolnikov's changing fortunes and character. All of these features aid in the portrayal of Raskolnikov's downfall and subsequent rise.
Philosophers have pondered over the subject of free will for decades and there still hasn’t been a definite answer to the question of free will. What does free will truly mean? Is it just a figure of our imagination? Or is it something that has been around since the creation of men? These are only a small fraction of questions the topic of free will arises. Free will can be broken down into smaller and fewer overcomplicated categories. A normal person like you has free will if our universe revolves around the fact of determinism, if you believe this theory, then you’d be considered a compatibilist. Compatibilism allows us to hold people responsible for their actions. You believe that the reason why
“Days of a Russian Noblewoman” is a translated memoir originally written by a Russian noblewoman named Anna Labzina. Anna’s memoir gives a unique perspective of the private life and gender roles of noble families in Russia. Anna sees the male and female gender as similar in nature, but not in morality and religiosity. She sees men as fundamentally different in morality and religiosity because of their capability to be freely dogmatic, outspoken, and libertine. Anna implies throughout her memoir that woman in this society have the capacity to shape and control their lives through exuding a modest, submissive, and virtuous behavior in times of torment. Through her marriage, Labzina discovers that her society is highly male centered.
Free will is an inherited ability everyone obtains from birth. This ability allows humans or any living being the freedom to act on their own behalf without being influenced or forced by an external medium. However, this fragile, yet powerful capability is susceptible of being misused that may result in unsavory consequences to the one at fault. In Paradise Lost and Frankenstein, both texts feature powerful figures who bequeathed the characters in focus, the freedom to do whatever they desire in their lives. Satan and Adam and Eve from Paradise Lost, and the monster from Frankenstein are given their free will from their creators, all encounter unique scenarios and obstacles in their respective texts however, have distinctions in how they handle each particular situation that ultimately conveys a similar message to
Throughout time people have tried to prove and disprove God, all part of free will. Free will allows people to believe based on faith but can allow people to demand proof. It also allows people to decide who they are, their identity. It’s what gives people the opportunity to build relationships with people. Some relationships can cause problems with God including going against what He tells people not to do, and betraying family. Lastly, it shapes civilization to one day become a great city or it fall and be destroyed. God gave people the free will to worship Him freely instead of being forced, but being able to choose a path to follow can lead to destruction.
The novel revolves around the three Karamazov brothers – Dimitri, Ivan and Alyosha – ‘s emotionally spiritual conflict between reason and faith. Dostoevsky portrayed this best through Book V, chapter 3 to 5 – in which an intellectual conversation between Ivan and Alyosha takes place. Their dinner conversation opens up a whole new paradigm of spirituality. Ivan, in order to explain his point of view on the matter, brings up the suffering of innocent children in particular and the human race in general. It is beyond his grasp how a living God could let mankind suffer for no particular reason. Furthermore, Ivan cannot seem to comprehend why the innocent and harmless children have to live their lives in suffering. He says in Book V chapter 4 – Rebellion: “Listen: if everyone must suffer, in order to buy eternal harmony with their suffering, pray tell me what have children got to do with it? It’s quite incomprehensible why they should have to suffer, and why they should buy harmony with their suffering. “ His poignant speech is so eloquently articulated that it makes us question whether this is actua...
Dostoevsky’s St. Petersburg is a large, uncaring city which fosters a western style of individualism. As Peter Lowe notes, “The city is crowded, but there is no communality in its crowds, no sense of being part of some greater ‘whole.’” Mrs. Raskolnikov initially notices a change in her son marked by his current state of desperate depression, but she fails to realize the full extent of these changes, even after he is convicted for the murder. The conditions and influences are also noticed by Raskolnikov’s mother who comments on the heat and the enclosed environment which is present throughout the city. When visiting Raskolnikov, she exclaims "I'm sure...
In Greek mythology as a whole, fate does have a sizeable role in most tales. However, the definition of fate for the ancient Greeks extends from the common definition. The definition of fate that is familiar to us is anything that happens for an unknown reason and is out of our control. But in Greek mythology fate also involves divine intervention from the gods of Olympus. They are able to change outcomes and alter situations to the point where what occurs might not have happened without them. In The Odyssey, gods have a very prominent role. But you cannot just discuss fate by itself. Free will is also a factor. Free will is mankind’s ability to make decisions control the aspects of one’s life. In The Odyssey life is the individual’s responsibility.
Fyodor Dostoevsky's remarkable insight into the psychology of man is seen here in the development of Raskolnikov's dream on the beating of a horse by drunken peasants. The dream is significant on several planes, most notably in the parallel of events in the dream with Raskolnikov's plan to murder the old pawnbroker. It also serves as perhaps the most direct example of the inseparable tie between events of the author's life with the psychological evolution of his protagonists, as well as lesser characters, through the criminal minds of Raskolnikov, Rogozhin, Stavrogin, and Smerdyakov, and into the familial relationships of The Brother's Karamazov.2
Imagine starting your day and not having a clue of what to do, but you begin to list the different options and routes you can take to eventually get from point A to point B. In choosing from that list, there coins the term “free will”. Free will is our ability to make decisions not caused by external factors or any other impediments that can stop us to do so. Being part of the human species, we would like to believe that we have “freedom from causation” because it is part of our human nature to believe that we are independent entities and our thoughts are produced from inside of us, on our own. At the other end of the spectrum, there is determinism. Determinism explains that all of our actions are already determined by certain external causes
Thread:The Merchant of Venice and Portia's Love GameRE: The Merchant of Venice and Portia's Love Game Ashley Viera
Within the context of Paradise Lost, it seems that Milton viewed free will as being somewhere between the ability to do whatever you wish and having all of your life events predetermined by God. Using this definition of free will Adam, Eve, Satan, the Son, and the Angels have the ability to choose their actions within situations that have been predetermined by, or are at least known to, God. It can then be proposed that the fall was not predetermined and that Adam and Eve had the choice to reject the temptation they were presented with but failed, leading to the fall of mankind.
Aurelius finds a way to complete her task. He asks a magician to create an illusion that the rocks disappeared. When Dorigen sees that the rocks are no longer there and must fulfill her promise to Aurelius, she becomes hysterical again and contemplates suicide. She would rather die than dishonor her promise to her husband. Averagus returns and Dorigen admits her failure to keep the honor of her word.