Introduction As student affairs practitioners, using and understanding student development theories is a key factor within our responsibilities. We must learn how to apply different theories to certain situations that will arise with our students on the college campus. Student development theories can also be vital in understanding why students may act the way they do. Student development theories can be defined as a way that a student grows, progresses, or increases his or her development capabilities, as a result of enrollment in an institution of higher education. Moreover, there are three types of development, which are change, growth, and development (Giroir, 2013). In this particular assignment, I am asked to interview a college graduate or student. I was also challenged to use different student development theories to explain my interviewee development. I chose to interview one of my fraternity brothers, who work in higher education. Doing the interview, I had some target questions that I wanted ask. I asked the interviewee questions relating to their relations to others, their personal growth, and their college journey. I will use Chickering’s Theory of Identity Development and Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development. Background Information My fraternity brother Jeremy is a college graduate, who is currently working at a university here in Little Rock, Arkansas. Jeremy works with first generation college student, with most of them begin African-Americans males. Jeremy grew up in a small country city in Arkansas. Jeremy chose this university to attend because he received an academic scholarship INTERVIEWS Forge, 3 and he wanted to move to a metropolitan city so he could experience a different way of living. J... ... middle of paper ... ...o demonstrate his development through his college experiences. Finally, I think Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development could be used to describe Jeremy in his college experience. I think as Jeremy progressed through his college years he has a relativistic thought process. When Jeremy first entered college, he was in a basic duality. He would be described as seeing the world dichotomous as an example of good-bad, right-wrong. Conclusion In closing, interviewing Jeremy was very interesting. I see a complete change from the person he told me he used to be; to the person he is today. I think his life is a great testimony for other students. I think what is doing in his career with working with other students like he used to be is such a great reward for him. This assignment has given me some practice with using different theories in practical situations.
McClish, Mark. “Susan Smith” http://www.statementanalysis.com/susan-smith/ Advanced Interviewing Concepts. May 6, 2002. Web, Feb. 7, 2012
When students learn about social behavior and relationships it is easier to understand why the behavior of other people is different from others. Our society has many ways of socializing with people around us, and getting to know the right way is an important factor. Everyone in our society has their own behavioral reaction to things and other people, therefore knowing how to react to any type of behavior, and not bring up a problem is something very important. If students are able to understand all the different ways in which they can socialize with others, then it will allow them to feel more comfortable with
If I were conducting this interview this is the format I would follow and the questions I would ask this character.
Helps to establish that a student’s low academic achievement is not due to inappropriate instruction, poor developmental activities and expectations deficit
The first person I had interviewed was my current roommate, Eric Liu, 19. He is a sophomore majoring in Computer Science from Chino Hills, California and is of Taiwanese descent. Eric Liu was also
We began our interview by asking Mr. Kressel, what are the most important parts of the interviewee’s job? With his response describing that the most important part was just to talk so that the interviewer, Kressel himself, could get to know how the candidate thinks. Most of the questions that are asked help Central Escrow see if they have potential in the company or do not. An example question that they ask is, have you ever faced a problem that you ended up failing in? What was it and were you able to learn from the problem? Hearing the interviewee talk will give Kressel an ideal of how the interviewee thinks. Finding someone with common sense and being a clear thinker may help the candidate to get the job. In the interview, Kressel will be able to find out basic technical information about the candidate and that can help determine if they will be hired or not.
For this assignment I interviewed three constituencies all from Bridgewater State University (BSU). For my constituencies I decided to open a dialogue with a support staff, administrator, and student in an attempt to get a holistic view of the institution both structurally and opinion wise. Before arranging times to meet with each individual I made sure I had clear, concise questions prepared. Each of the Interviewees was asked the same five questions: (1) Can you tell me a bit more about your role/work/studies at Bridgewater State University? (2) What background/ training/skills did you need to be qualified for your current role? (3) What do you enjoy most about your position/studies? (4) Are there things that make BSU special or unique? (5) what would you like to see change for the better in relation to your role on campus? All of
Stephen L. Carter proposes that integrity and honesty among other virtues and morals were unintentionally taught to our society via religious scriptures, nonacademic lessons in public schools, and child rearing methods used by parents are in the “curriculum” of “character education”. Despite the differences of virtues in areas such as sectionalism, prejudice, and racism, "nurture" or rearing of a society with virtues such as honesty and integrity is best understood as "monkey-see monkey-do"-the “source of growth in children's cognitive, language, and social skills” (Kessenich, Maureen, et al. "Developmental Theory.").
I have landed every job I’ve ever done an interview for. Even though I’ve landed great opportunities, I know that this assignment has helped me grow in my own ability to interview and to be interviewed. To demonstrate some of the success and downfalls of our interview I will first, discuss my interviewing of Matthew Nelson. Secondly, I will discuss Matthew interviewing me. Finally, I will conclude with the overall success of the interview and this assignment. The questions are woven throughout my paper. To help reduce confusion for the reader I have inserted footnotes at each question. To begin, I start with a brief outline of the interview overall followed by Matthews’s response to each question.
When we were first given this assignment I had not put much consideration into it. I thought we were to ask a couple of questions, it would all work itself out and I would be done. But this was not the case. The thought and reflection put into interview questions really surprised me. There was far more factors other than the questions you were asking, because you were also dealing with people, people who are giving you there free time, their attention and opening themselves up to you a stranger, so there were far more responsibilities then what were initially at hand.
*** The individual I am interviewing said he would get back with me Tuesday morning so I will put in more details!***
I, Jennifer Berger, am a student at Oklahoma State University, and I am currently in a professional skills course. I have been assigned to conduct a few interviews with volunteers, which will ultimately improve my skills in the professional world. I am very grateful that you are open and willing to share some information with me, in order to complete this assignment.
I have met many people so far in this life, but the person I enjoy remembering the most is my husband Jeff. He was born and raised in Tennessee. He is six feet tall, weighs two hundred sixty seven pounds,he has dark brown eyes, and such a nice smile. His hair is jet black with just a few silver and white strands throughout. He is a very big and strong character of a man. And yet he is the most gentle, kind and caring man that I have ever met. Jeff has a sexy southern drawl to his voice. The one person who has influenced my life greatly is my husband, the first reason being because of his positive attitude, his intelligence, and the way he expresses his love.
In Erikson’s Identity vs. Role Confusion stage, I thought, “Who am I?” countless times like many other adolescents. I occupied much of my time trying to construct a firm identity of myself, which I now realized did more harm than good. Letting myself explore different interests would have helped me find my identity than me trying to fake some firm identity.
Students need to be inspired to think critically. By this they comprehend what has been learned and be able to use it. I hope my students will be able to achieve their greatest potential that they can accomplish anything they set their minds to. We can give our children these building blocks thru education to use in decision making situations, moral value of their thoughts and actions. This will guide them to realize how their actions and decisions will affect themselves and others.