Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Views of power in leadership
An essay on factors that influence motivation
An essay on factors that influence motivation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Views of power in leadership
Motivational theories can be applied in a multitude of situations, but in this case the problems that must be resolved include poor morale, low performance levels, and frequent absences. After speaking with the employees it was found that none of them cared about their performance in the workplace. To properly address these issues, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, McClelland’s Theory, and McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y can be applied. Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory can be used to improve working conditions and decrease employee dissatisfaction. Doing so would potentially motivate employees to perform better in the workplace and be more inclined to be involved in the job. Applying McClelland’s Theory would allow for the employees three basic categories …show more content…
The need for achievement regards an individual’s relationship with setting challenging goals, creating competitive scenarios, and overcoming difficulties. Setting goals and creating healthy competition between employees can bring the performance level back to normal, and even better yet surpass the usual level. The need for power regards an individual’s need to positively influence coworkers and improve their wellbeing by making a difference in their life. Having an impact on the lives of others has the potential to influence employee turnover rates and attendance. If an individual feels that they have power over another employee they will be more inclined to show up to work everyday and to stay at their current job for longer than they may have originally anticipated. The need for affiliation concerns the relationships that an individual needs to maintain positive, close, or intimate feelings with others. Positive, close relationships in the workplace make individuals feel as if they are truly a part of the organization and increase satisfaction levels amongst workers. These close relationships will help employees to fell that their work is appreciated within the organization and that there certainly are people who care how they perform at their jobs. Together, achievement, power, and affiliation all play an influential part in motivating individuals in the …show more content…
In regards to achievement, setting goals for employees and creating competitive scenarios can lead to better performance. An employer, to accomplish this, could implement a program in which rewards are given to those who produce the most proficient results at the end of the workweek. In this example we are dealing with a large manufacturing company, so it would be best to establish a program in which the individual who produces the greatest number of quality outputs receives a small monetary bonus at the end of the week. This would motivate employees to perform at their best and to produce the greatest possible results. Secondly, in regards to power, an individual who has the ability to positively influence another individual will be more inclined to show up to work everyday and to stay at that particular job for a longer period of time. A way to motivate employees to do this would be to nominate an individual to oversee a particular segment of production each month allowing that individual to feel as if they have the ability to positively influence the lives of others, other than on the personal level. Then, each month a new employee would be in charge of overseeing that area to ensure that one person does not become too power-happy and that everyone gets a chance at that power position. Lastly, in regards to affiliation, close and intimate
After reading The Four Obsessions of an Extraordinary Executive, I think that the author brings up an excellent, although rather idealistic, plan for organizing and maintaining an upper-level management team. The four "obsessions" or disciplines as they are referred to in the text, cover the entire spectrum of the ideal team. The early stages of teambuilding are covered and he explains the high level of trust and accountability that are required, even comparing it to the closeness of an actual family. He than discusses the clarity of the team, touching on aspects such as values, goals, and my favorite, competition. He stresses the immense importance of over communicating this clarity until you feel that you have "beaten a dead horse". Finally, he discusses the reinforcement of this clarity throughout every part of the human resource system. This includes the interview process when hiring workers, the periodic evaluations, and even in the dismissal stage. In this paper, I would like to focus on the discipline that I feel is most commonly overlooked, reinforcement through human relations.
Teams are making a positive impact on many businesses and are proven to be very beneficial for accomplishing tasks within the organization more efficiently; however, there must be an awareness of how power plays an integral part when managing or leading these teams. Businesses are also recognizing that in order for their organization to be successful, effective leadership is vital to motivate, reward, and empower their employees; therefore, if leaders do not use their power in a constructive way, the impact on the infrastructure of the organization would be devastating. For example, morale is lowered, excessive absenteeism from work, and employee turnovers within the organization. A common problem found within organizations is the abuse of power. Individuals who abuse power, exhibits fear of losing that power due to a lack of confidence in job performance. Perhaps what most leaders do not understand is that the critical element in a company’s success is interdependence on one another. In other words, in order for the company to move forward, the leader must encourage, support, and i...
When compared, both theories achievement – power- affiliation theory and expectancy theory resemble each other. Both theories can be utilized as strategies for gaining employee buy-in for the upcoming change. Achievement-power-affiliation theory, persons have a specific goal in mind to work towards, and takes responsibility for their own actions. I feel this theory will be effective in promoting employee acceptance of the upcoming changes due to the fact that some employees like to stand out from others in departments, and others may be motivated to stand out with new changes. Expectancy Theory persons, also have goals in mind, but their way to achieve their goals are that is based on past experiences and self confidence. I also feel the expectancy theory will be effective in promoting employee acceptance of the upcoming changes because most employees will know in advance that they will be rewarded by pay increase, advancements in the departments. Expectancy Theory people are committed, and motivated so because organizations rely heavily on employees to produce quality of goods and services produced in organizations.
Achieving organizational goals is the motivation rather than personal advancement and intrinsic rewards are more motivating to a purposeful leader than external rewards (Yukl, 2013, p. 311). Congruity among behavior, values, and vision contributes to a sense of self-identification with the organizational goals (Bennis, 2009, p. 152). Others in the organization attribute greater charisma to such a leader and will be more open to the leader’s influence.
Intragroup competition is when members within a group see their goal achievements as negatively related. This is when an individual member is acting toward his or her goals interferes and makes less effort to fulfill of another individual members goals (Na 'im, 2004).Competition in a work environment is not generally positive.It is an inventible part of an organisation which employed individuals with high aspirations and are also well driven.Competition causes unhealthy rivalry that leads to employees resenting against each other.This is because employee within groups is attempting to outperform one another prior to their performance levels.Since we live in a competitive world, an excellent performance is quite valued by most leaders and employees are being judged by it.Every individual is assessed due to their performances in comparison with every member in the work environment. However ,regardless of the way that it enables to motivate employees it likewise leads to a variety of negative effects.Because all employees want to be successful and to be rewarded this lead them to compete which therefore lead to conflict .
Taking an example of Sara’s manager who did not put an effort to recognize his employee’s needs and understand her type of characteristics that led Sara to resign. Therefore, manager must motivate his employees by knowing what fit their needs and personalities according to the three theories of motivation. For Instance, applying the theory X and Y is an obvious way of interpreting and differentiate between challenging and lazy employees. Theory X shows if they are going to be pushed to work while theory Y shows if they are self-achievers. Likewise, applying Maslow’s Hierarchy which is “a hierarchy of five needs physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualization in which as each need is substantially satisfied, the next need becomes dominate” (Robbins & Judge, 2015). By specifying each employees needs in the organization and satisfy these needs, employees are going to achieve the goals of the company. Also, MacClelland’s theory views employees who have high demand for power, affiliation or achievement. It is extremely important for manager to understand the nature of the person in front of him if they like to be empower, if they like to interact with people, or if they like to finish accomplishments. Secondly, job enrichment can be used for motivating employees by giving them more tasks, authorities, and responsibility. Employees this way
McClelland proposed that an individual’s particular needs are obtained over time as a result of life experiences (Wood et al. p. 146). Most of these needs fall into three general categories of needs which can be class as need for achievement, affiliation or power. The strengths of the McClelland’s acquired needs theory is that it provides a clear picture for the organization and the managers to know which type of job are suitable for the employees and which types of people that can make the organizations more successful. According to the article, the authors stated that managers who have strong power of needs are more successful than those with lower power needs (Wagner & Swanson 1979, p. 66). ‘McClelland and Burnham identify two types of power managers: those who seek personal power and those who seek institutional power’ (Lyden 1976, p. 201). However, manager who seek for institutional power are more successful as they can create favorable condition at work. Wagner and Swanson (1979, p. 66) attributes the success of higher power needs people to their ability to create a greater sense of responsibility and team spirit in their organizations. This will give a clear picture for the organization on which of the employees that are suitable to be promoted and become a manager.
Pardee, R. L. (1990). Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor & McClelland. A Literature Review of Selected Theories Dealing with Job Satisfaction and Motivation.
“The two factor theory (sometimes) also called motivation- hygiene theory) was proposed by psychologist Frederick Herzberg" organizational Behavior, (Robbins, 2001:157). The two factors of motivation are intrinsic factors and extrinsic factors. The intrinsic factors like, work, responsibility and achievement, relate to job satisfaction, the extrinsic factors like, pay, company policies supervision, and working conditions are associated with job dissatisfaction. The first factors, called hygiene factors and the second factors called motivators, "Hygiene factors include the presence or absence of job dissatisfies, and like working inters personal relationships”. Psychology Today, What is motivation, Jane Smith and Jim Taylor, 2007. The second collection of factors includes a...
As with any theory, the motivator-hygiene theory has its share of criticisms. Among them is the lack of consideration for individual differences. Herzberg’s theory only takes into account internal organizational factors and does not consider personal attitudes and beliefs of one’s work. Moreover, the two-factor theory assumes that high job satisfaction equates to performance at work. This, however, does not hold true in many situations.(insert example) A highly satisfied, content, and happy worker is not necessarily the hardest worker in an organization.
Research has shown that motivation in an employee is an important factor which determines his performance. Motivation is the “driving force within individuals” (Mullins, 2007, p. 285). It is the concerned with finding out the reasons which shape and direct the behaviour of the individuals. The people act to achieve something so that they can satisfy some needs (Gitman and Daniel, 2008). It is important for the manager to understand this motivation of individual employees in order to inspire them and devise an appropriate set of incentives and rewards which would satisfy the needs that they have individually (Kerr, 2003). Once these needs are expected to be met in return for some specific behaviour or action, they would work more diligently to have that behaviour in them and to achieve that objective (Meyer and Hersovitch, 2001). Since it would lead to early and fuller achievement of the company objectives as the individual would work more diligently, it would lead to better organizational performance (Wiley, 1997).
When it is discovered that a worker can fulfill the requirements of their job, but are experiencing shortcomings in doing so, many times it is believed that worker motivation may be the root of the problem (Laird 95). What, though, is work motivation? According to Laird (2006), “motivation is a fundamental component of performance “ and “is the reason that someone chooses to do some things and chooses not to do others”. In other words, work motivation is what energizes workers to the level of output required to fulfill a task, directs their energy towards the objectives that they need to accomplish, and sustains that level of effort over a period of time (Steers et al., 2004). In essence, worker motivation is what gets the job done. Employee motivation has always been a central problem in the workplace, and, as an individual in a supervisory position, it becomes ones duty to understand and institute systems that ensure the proper motivation of your subordinates. Proper motivation of employees can ensure high productivity and successful workflow, while low worker motivation can result in absenteeism, decreased productivity rates, and turnover. A large body of research has been produced regarding motivation, and much of this research is applicable to the workplace. Due to the nature of man, motivation varies from individual to individual, and, because of this, there is no one system that is the best for ensuring worker motivation in every organizational situation, and, as a product, many theories have been created to outline what drives people to satisfactorily complete their work tasks. Throughout the course of this document, the three main types of these motivational theories will be outlined and examples of each as well...
Ability in in turn depends on education, experience and training and its improvement is a slow and long process. On the other hand motivation can be improved quickly. There are many options and an uninitiated manager may even know where to start. As a guideline seven strategies for motivation.
In daily life, we need motivation to improve our performance in our job or in studies. Motivation is an internal force, dependent on the needs that drive a person to achieve. In the other words, motivation is a consequence of expectations of the future while satisfaction is a consequence of past events (Carr, 2005). We need to give reward to our self when we did correctly or we has achieve our target. Reward is something that we are given because we have behaved well, worked hard, or provided a service to the community. Theories of motivation can be used to explain the behavior and attitude of employees (Rowley, 1996; Weaver, 1998). The theories include content theories, based on assumptions that people have individual needs, which motivate their action. Meanwhile according to Robbins (2001), motivation is a needs-satisfying process, which means that when a person's needs are satisfied by certain factors, the person will exert superior effort toward attaining organizational goals. Schulze and Steyn (2003) affirmed that in order to understand people’s behavior at work, managers or supervisors must be aware of the concept of needs or motives which will help “move” their employees to act.Theories such as Maslow (1954), McClelland (1961), Herzberg (1966) and Alderfer (1969) are renowned for their works in this field. The intrinsic reward or also be known as motivators factors is the part of Herzberg motivation theory. Motivators are involve factors built into the job or the studies itself such as achievement, recognition, responsibility and advancement. Hygiene factors are extrinsic to the job such as interpersonal relationship, salary, supervision and company policy (Herzberg, 1966. There have two factors that are called hygiene fac...
Motivation is an important function in organizations to motivate their employees for their ability to perform well, improving their skills, increasing productivity, job satisfaction and employee extension. Employees also are not a machines that we could just program their task in their brain and they will do it automatically, they require motivation to actually do their job properly. And so, after discussing the process models of the Maslow’s “Hierarchy of needs”, Douglas McGregor theory X and Y, and also the Herzberg’s “two factor motivation hygiene theory.” understanding the ways of motivating people, the human nature, and the substance of nature. I believe that the true motivation can only come from within and also managers can actually motivate all of their employees.