Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic justifications for slavery
Economic justifications for slavery
Economic justifications for slavery
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Economic justifications for slavery
Slavery was a main contributor in the South in the 1800s. African Americans were enslaved in large plantations growing cotton, instead of tobacco. Slavery was the same old story it was in the 1600s, barely anything had changed. Slavery was the dominating reality of southern life in the antebellum period due to economical, social, and political reasons. Before the American civil war, the Southerner’s economy had almost entirely been constructed on slave and cash crop agriculture. The cotton gin was invented by Eli Whitney. The cotton gin was a contraption that transmogrified the fabrication of cotton by significantly making the task of removing seeds from the cotton fiber faster. The invention benefitted the slaves because it saved the slaves …show more content…
Southerners produced more than 50% of the entire world’s supply of cotton. About 75% of the luxurious cotton supply came from Southern states. According to a chart on slavery and cotton production in America, cotton and slavery are directly proportional (Doc B). For example, in 1840 the number of slaves in America was 25,00000 slaves, while the number of bales was 125,0000 bales. Another economic reason that made slavery a dominating reality of Southern life in the antebellum period was slave auctions. On the auction block, families were often sundered, due to economic reasons. These economic reasons included insolvency or the segregation of “property” among successors. The separation of families was one of slavery’s biggest psychological nightmares. The poster from 1823 promoted a slave auction (Doc A). The point of view of the poster is in favor of slavery. In this poster, the slaves are described in terms of their capability to do tasks. Slaves would be inspected like an animal by potential buyers. Potential buyers would have slaves open their mouths, and would also prod them with sticks. The younger and healthier the slave was, the more expensive he/she …show more content…
Slavery was demeaning to the victims. Slaves were declined the right to an education because reading brought visions, and visions led to dissatisfaction. Many states passed laws stating slaves didn't have a right to an education. At the beginning of the Civil War, perhaps 9/10 of the slaves were illiterate. Also, black slave’s marriages were rarely legally recognized, due to the ineluctable separation that would come at the slave auctions. Slaves didn't have the right to vote. Lastly, slaves didn't have the ability to testify in court. This is shown in a petition by Arthur Lee Freemen. Freemen begs the General Assembly of Virginia (audience) to let him stay in the same state with his wife and four children. He doesn't want to seek a new living in a new country away from his wife and kids. Freemen’s petition most likely was ignored by the General Assembly of Virginia, because slaves weren't able to testify in court. Virginia’s General assembly wanted to kick out Freemen because he was a free black, and free blacks were physical examples of what could be accomplished by emancipation and hence were begrudged and abominated by supporters of the slave system. Free blacks were still enchained to slavery because even after they established their lives, they were forced to move to other states due to slavery. The former slave owners still saw the free black as a slave,
Prior to the cotton gin, a laborer could only pick the seeds out of approximately one pound of cotton a day. The cotton gin made it possible to clean up to 50 pounds per day. The farmers could now plant as much cotton as they wanted and not have the worry about the difficulties of seed removal. Eli’s invention spurred the growth of the cotton industry, and the South took up the slogan “Cotton is King.”
During the 17th and early 18th century, slavery in the United States grew from being a small addition to the labor force to a huge institution that would persist for more than a century. Much of the development of slavery occurred in the Middle and Southern colonies, especially Virginia. Without the events that occurred and the policies established in Virginia during this time period, slavery would never have become what it did today. The decrease in indentured labor coming from England led to an increase in slave labor in the colonies, and the introductions of the concepts of hereditary slavery and chattel slavery transformed slavery into the binding institution it became in the 18th century.
The southern states were all tied together, but they each had there own economic priorities and there own view and importance on slavery. First, the Lower South (South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas) there focus ands main crop production was cotton; therefore concluding that slavery in the Lower South was highly important to their productivity. Next, the Middle South (Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas) had many different agricultural needs and many jobs spread throughout the area reducing the need for slavery in this region. Lastly, The Upper or Border South (Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri) slavery was beginning to decrease. The Lower South definitely favored slavery more than other regions, but they needed the slaves for all the cotton that there producing; the entire South had one thing in common and that was that they were against doing away with slavery. Therefore, the Old South was trying to increase slavery while the Union was trying to do away with, which led to the Confederate States of America in
Everybody has something they feel that makes their lives easier, something a person becomes so accustomed to they could not live without it. This is what African slaves were to the Southern colonists. Slavery was a huge factor in the Southerner’s lives. Originally the colonists used indentured servants to work in their homes and on their plantations. This situation was not ideal because the Southern farmers wanted more control over their workers (orange). Virginian farmers heard about the success of slavery in the Caribbean and thought it would be a good solution to their problems (blue). The southern colonists had a very different way of earning a living than in the north. They needed people to work through “the harsh realities of a land-rich, but labor-scarce economy…” (Purple). The plantation owners had all the land and resources, but no one to work on their grounds long term. Throughout the years 1607-1775, slavery rose as an important contributor to the South’s economy due to social, geographic and economic aspects.
Back in the 1700’s slavery had just come to the Americas and was thought as a revolutionary entity that was necessary for all people. The owners of these slaves forced them work all day long through all the elements just to get their money. Even if they, by some means, escaped slavery they still did the hard labor, which others were not willing to do, for money.
The development of the most beneficial technology in the Old South that we all know as the cotton gin was developed by Yale graduate Eli Whitney in the year 1793. This took place shortly after his relocation from Massachusetts to Georgia when it was brought to his attention from his former manager that harvesting cotton was both time consuming and unbeneficial to plantation owners. As a result, he was then asked to develop a resolution for support; thus the cotton gin was born. This extraordinary machine had the ability to separate cotton from its seeds through hand cranking. The acquisition of the cotton gin was the fact that cotton evolved into the most economically beneficial crop in the Old South. This became the primary reason for the use of the slogan “King Cotton”.
On the other hand, Southern states were agrarian, especially after the invention of the cotton gin, which boosted cotton production, as well as the population of enslaved African Americans. Due to the growing amount of slavery, many anti-slavery documents in the form of pamphlets, books, and newspapers articles
In the articles composed of many different documents all having to do with slavery it shows how enormous the Atlantic slave trade really was and how millions of African Americans were victims. These documents allow us to hear a few stories that the slaves had during slavery and how many of the Europeans controlled the slavery and let it become one of the biggest parts of history today. Europeans let slavery get as big as it did back then because they needed slaves in order to do the work they needed done. The Africans captured the slaves then shipped them to the Europeans where they were then sold by their qualities and the price that the bidders bought them for.
The south was known as the cotton kingdom because cotton was the major crop grown there. Cotton became a lot more populated after a man named Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. The cotton gin was a machine that that separated the seeds and dirt from the fibers of the cotton. The significance of the cotton gin was that it allowed one person to do the work of 1,000 people. The cotton gin made slavery expand. In 1860 only one white southerner in 30 belonged to a planer family, and less than 1% of planters owned only one or two slaves. 75% where small farmers might own one or two slaves, most didn't own their land they rented it and lived in a small house. Poor whites were very low on the social ladder and had a hard life but were happy they were free. In 1860 over 200,000 free blacks lived in the south, they had special laws and weren't able to travel. Many free blacks were forced to move to the north. Slave life depended on the plantation, some slaves were treated very good and there owners made sure they had good warm food a warm place to sleep and nice clothes, while others were treated very poorly and there owners spent little to no time on
As stated in the article, “Differences in the Northern & Southern States in the 1800s” By Kevin Wandrei, “In the North, many blacks were free, and in states such as Massachusetts, New York and Ohio, 100 percent of the black population was free.” The union, also known as the north, was anti-slavery and for the most part, firmly believed it was wrong and cruel. In document 10, article titled, “Declaration of the Sentiments of the American Anti-Slavery Society,” abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison stated that him and other abolitionists will do everything in their power to, “secure to the colored population of the United States, all the rights and privileges which belong to them as men, and as
Later on, in 1793 Eli Whitney he designed a new type of cotton gin. While seeing the worker’s hand movement, he invented a machine that could clean 50 pounds a day instead of 1 pound per day. Then, within a year a huge profit was made south carolina quickly became a leading producer and was later on known as “King” of cotton. The new cotton gin immediate interested small farmers to make a profit. Cotton quickly spread small farmers had obtained wealth and status by investing cotton and slaves. While achieving this it helped unite tensions between lower country and upcountry. “[Both[ regions [later on] bec[ame] more similar than different (South Carolina Journey, pg. 119)”.
The rise of cotton in the late 18th century was an important time for the economy. The production of cotton was concentrated primarily in the Southern part of the United States due to the climate and growing conditions. The agricultural South was completely dependent on the production of cotton. As the late 18th century cash crops such as rice, indigo, and tobacco became less beneficial. Eli Whitney, a graduate from Yale University, and looking to pay off college debt invented a machine that changed history. The cotton gin is known as the “cotton gin.” This machine led the way to an economic uproar. Plantation owners saw Whitney’s invention as a way to make money fast. Cotton became exceptionally profitable and was a major success in the Antebellum
Cotton dates back all the way to 3000 BC. According to Royal Botanic Gardens, the earliest written reference to cotton lies within South Asia, but fragments of cotton fabric dated back to the Indus Valley. In South Asia there was a sudden boom in cotton trade. Cotton would be traded throughout European countries. In early America, cotton was an economic gold mine. The Chesapeake and Delaware bays have been home to cotton manufacturers from 1736 (Industry in America 1). In the early 1800’s, the slave trade facilitated the rise of “King Cotton”, which was the term for the use of slavery to harvest cotton.
In 1794, a man named Eli Whitney patented an invention called the Cotton Gin while employed by Catherine Greene, an independent mother and plantation owner. The machine increased cotton production exponentially by speeding up the process of pulling the cotton fibers away from the seeds. This invention was revolutionary in the fact that at the time, the southern economy had no textiles to refine the produce and little means of transportation and the south was actually moving away from the labour intensive production of cotton. However, with the help of the cotton gin; cotton soon became the leading export of the South's cotton-based agricultural economy.Though the cotton gin was a remarkably simple device it caused an explosion in textile production in the south and the textbook provides the data that “in the decade of the 1790s, cotton production increased from 3,000 bales a year to 73,000... all of which made slaves more indispensable than ever” (157).
The Southern economy can be described as a continuous cycle of increased crop production, leading to increased profit, which results in purchasing more slaves. The plantation owners of the South had a free labor force to do their work on the fields, therefore resulting in higher profit. However, heavily relying on manpower to do the work stifled the South’s motivation for industrialization. This was a significant drawback to the use of slaves. Although the cotton