Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of slavery in colonies
Slavery in the late 1700s to early 1800s
Slavery in the late 1700s to early 1800s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of slavery in colonies
Misael Caballero
12 December, 2017
Paper #3
From the 1790’s to the 1860’s, slavery was a topic of discussion which sparked controversy between the north and the south. The dispute here between the two is whether slavery should be enforced in the colonies or whether they should abolish it. In the north, it was known as the antislavery division full of abolitionists who believe that slaves should be free. Slaves also had much more freedom in the north where many states were known to be one hundred percent slavery free due to the high surplus of immigrating Europeans. Many slaves began to raise their voices to the unfair cruelty they were facing and this sparked even more controversy. According to document 2, “The Middle Passage,” by Olaudah
…show more content…
Equiano, he states that, “Every circumstance I met with served only to render my state more painful, and heighten my apprehensions, and my opinion of the cruelty of the whites…" In the south, it portrayed a much different approach to things than the north. The south portrayed a pro slave mentality due to the high demand of labor for crops such as cotton and tobacco. In addition, many plantation owners and southern farm owners still firmly held the idea of owning slaves as property. The ultimate dispute between the two was that the southern states, which were agricultural, felt slavery was necessary, while people living in the industrial north felt it should be abolished in every state. For starters, in the north, slavery was starting to die out as more European immigrants were starting to immigrate to large cities like New York and others where they were almost entirely free of slavery.
As stated in the article, “Differences in the Northern & Southern States in the 1800s” By Kevin Wandrei, “In the North, many blacks were free, and in states such as Massachusetts, New York and Ohio, 100 percent of the black population was free.” The union, also known as the north, was anti-slavery and for the most part, firmly believed it was wrong and cruel. In document 10, article titled, “Declaration of the Sentiments of the American Anti-Slavery Society,” abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison stated that him and other abolitionists will do everything in their power to, “secure to the colored population of the United States, all the rights and privileges which belong to them as men, and as …show more content…
Americans.” Cruelty was something that many African American slaves faced day to day and many slaves were starting to speak up. One of them was the famous Frederick Douglass, who in document 17, article titled,“The Meaning of July Fourth for the Negro” he mocks the fourth of July by stating that “a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices more shocking and bloody than are the people of the United States, at this very hour.” In the south, there was an obvious pro slave mentality.
According to document 14, “Letters of James Henry Hammond,” South Carolina, 1845 they state that, “You will say that man cannot hold property in man. The answer is that he can, and actually does, hold property in his fellow, all over the world, in a variety of forms, and has always done so.” The idea of slaves being property was one that southerners held with a tight grip. According to the article, “The Expansion of Slavery in the United States” by Nicholas Bunner, “Southerners used every legal tool at their disposal to protect their rights to own people, and force them to work for their masters’ profit.” Since crops such as cotton and tobacco were in high demand this was a massive reason as to why southerners wanted to keep
slavery. As debates heated between the north and the south, the issue whether to spread slavery to the newly acquired states became a big issue. Northerners believe that by spreading slavery across the country, inevitably joining the south, their political power would be under fire. The south, on the other hand, would still be firm in using all of their legal power to ensure and protect the rights to own people. Despite being a pro slave division, some southerners started to believe that the ownership of slaves was wrong. According to document 8, titled, “Letter to his fiancée Mary” by Charles Colcott Jones, he shows signs of resentment by stating that, “I am moreover undecided whether I ought to continue to hold slaves. As to the principle of slavery, it is wrong. It is unjust, contrary to nature and religion, to hold men enslaved.” This dispute between the north and the south would be one that would carry on until the emancipation proclamation took effect in January of 1863, which ultimately freed 3.1 out of 4 million slaves.
The United States began to dissatisfy some of its citizens and so the concerns of sectionalism, or the split of the country began to arise. There was a continuous riff between the south and the north over a few issues, a major one being slavery. The south argued that the slaves were necessary to support the southern economy. According to document A, the south were angry that the north was creating taxes that hurt the southern economy, thus increasing the need for slavery since they had to make up for the expense of the taxes. The south felt that the north was able...
They needed to teach their slaves the ways of Christianity, treat them as a good Christian is supposed to. “If Southern slavery was humane and generous and rooted in Christianity, then it could easily be justified … as an institution beneficial to [both masters and slaves]” (Finkelman 32). As long as they provided their slaves with sufficient food, water and shelter, and evangelical education, their ownership was morally sound. However, though the South biblically substantiated the institution of general slavery, they did not make a sufficient argument to legitimize racial slavery.
The Southerners viewed slavery as a luxury and a necessity. Financial gain was one of the reasons slavery was tremendously popular. Slaves were required to work in various places for little or no money. Therefore, this helped the slave owners achieve their goal of increasing their profits because they did not have to pay for labor costs. With lower labor costs, the Southerners had more disposable income. This extra money allowed them to pay their taxes, to buy more land, and to even possibly purchase more slaves.
The southern economy was largely dependent on slaves, who worked on the numerous plantations of the South. Moreover, the main purpose of slavery in the South was for the cultivation of these cotton plantations. (Doc 4) For this reason, southerners believed
Slavery was abolished in the North when Abraham Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. This proclamation upset the southern states and they decided to sever their ties with the rest of the country. In the textbook it says, "Northerners saw the South as a slave power, determined to foist the slave system on free labor throughout the land. Southerners saw the North as full of black republicanism, determined to destroy their way of life" ...
"The American constitution recognized slavery as a local constitution within the legal rights of the individual states. But in the North slavery was not adaptable to the local economy, and to many, it contradicted the vision of the founding fathers for a nation in which all men are to be free. The South considered slavery as a necessary institution for the plantation economy. It was linked to the local culture and society. As the United states expanded, the North worried that the South would introduce slavery into the new territories. Slavery had become both a moral issue and a question of political power." (Kral p61)
By 1860, the slave states had approximately four million slaves making up approximately one-third of the South's population. However, opposition to slavery began as early as the 1700's by religious leaders and philosophers in North America and Europe who condemned the practice, arguing that slavery was contrary to God's teachings and violated basic human rights. During the Revolutionary War, many Americans came to feel that slavery in the United States was wrong because they believed that protection of human rights was one of the founding tenets of the United States, and slaves were not accorded rights. Slavery was likely opposed more rapidly in the North in part because fewer people in the North owned slaves. Northern abolitionists began organized efforts to end the practice of slavery in the 1800's. But much of the American South, believed that slavery was vital to the continuation of its livelihood and lifestyle and therefore defended the institution of slavery.
The 1850s were a turbulent time in American history. The North and South saw totally different views on the issue of slavery. The North saw slavery as immoral and that it was unconstitutional. The south, on the other hand, saw slavery as their right. The South viewed African Americans as lower human beings, which justified slavery.
In Colonial America indentured slavery happen gradually. The colony of Virginia was one place the “terrible transformation” took place. There were Africans and poor whites that came from English working class, black and whites worked side by side in the fields. They were all indentured servants as servants they were fed and housed. After their time was served, they were given “freedom dues,” with that came a piece of land and supplies. Black and whites became free. The English would not enslave non-Christians slaves; they could be set freed by converting to Christianity (PBS Online, nd).
When one thinks of slavery, they may consider chains holding captives, beaten into submission, and forced to work indefinitely for no money. The other thing that often comes to mind? Stereotypical African slaves, shipped to America in the seventeenth century. The kind of slavery that was outlawed by the 18th amendment, nearly a century and a half ago. As author of Modern Slavery: The Secret World of 27 Million People, Kevin Bales, states, the stereotypes surrounding slavery often confuse and blur the reality of slavery. Although slavery surely consists of physical chains, beatings, and forced labor, there is much more depth to the issue, making slavery much more complex today than ever before.
In the Autobiography, “Narrative Life of Fredrick Douglas: An American Slave,” Fredrick Douglas writes to show what the life of a slave is like, because from personal experience, he knows. Fredrick Douglas not only shows how his life has been as a slave but shows what it is like to be on the bottom and be mistreated. Douglas shows that freedom isn’t free, and he took the initiative to become a free man. Not many African-Americans had the opportunity to make themselves free and were forced to live a life of disparity and torture. Through his experience Douglas shows us the psychological effects of slavery. Through Douglas’s memory we are able to relive the moments that continued to haunt his life. Douglas’s book showed the true
Slavery was one of the tragedies that have shaped not only American history, but global history as well. So what exactly is slavery? Slavery was the legal trade of human beings to be sold for a profit. These people who were taken from their motherland and brought to the United States, Brazil, and a few of the Caribbean islands were forced to do work in households and outside in the fields. Slavery continued throughout the 1500’s to the 1800’s. Between these 300 years, somewhere in between 10 to 12 million slaves were transported across sea’s to become someone else’s property. Many people use the Bible as the justification of slavery, although, the act in itself can not really be justified.
“I freed a thousand slaves. I could have freed a thousand more, if only they had known they were slaves.” Harriet Tubman was a woman known for her important role during the time that led up to the Civil War. She was a woman of incredible strength, courage, and determination. And while Harriet Tubman is credited for giving the slaves an option as to what way they shall spend the rest of their life, the sad truth lies within the quote above. While many people like to believe that slavery was a horrendous act that happened only with small minded people from the south many years ago, that isn’t the case in all honesty. In fact, the idea of slavery was highly debated about and troubled more minds than many are led to believe. While there are
It was a matter constantly debated during drafting of the Constitution. Many acts and laws were passed regarding slavery, such as the Fugitive Slave Act, which returned escaped slaves back to their masters. The three-fifths compromise counted a single slave as three-fifths of a person. Although slavery was not the sole cause of the formation of Southern Democrats and Northern Republicans, it highlighted vast differences between the two territories. Slavery created class distinction among Southerners. Due to the high costs of slaves, not many Southerners had the means to own one. The quantity of slaves one possessed translated as wealth. This fueled the desire of slaveholders to buy more slaves, which ultimately led to their bankruptcy. Slavery created negative outcomes for African culture as well. Due to constant wars from Coastal kingdoms, where everyone bought their slaves from, Africans suffered slow advancement and progress in culture and development due to interruptions and decrease in
The word “slavery” brings back horrific memories of human beings. Bought and sold as property, and dehumanized with the risk and implementation of violence, at times nearly inhumane. The majority of people in the United States assumes and assures that slavery was eliminated during the nineteenth century with the Emancipation Proclamation. Unfortunately, this is far from the truth; rather, slavery and the global slave trade continue to thrive till this day. In fact, it is likely that more individuals are becoming victims of human trafficking across borders against their will compared to the vast number of slaves that we know in earlier times. Slavery is no longer about legal ownership asserted, but instead legal ownership avoided, the thought provoking idea that with old slavery, slaves were maintained, compared to modern day slavery in which slaves are nearly disposable, under the same institutionalized systems in which violence and economic control over the disadvantaged is the common way of life. Modern day slavery is insidious to the public but still detrimental if not more than old American slavery.