Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Speech on the dangers of smoking
Speech on the dangers of smoking
Arguments for the smoking legislation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Speech on the dangers of smoking
If a new policy to develop a smoke free environment for the university is to be created, the policy must consider the following four important factors: bans on smoking, anti-smoking ads, public lectures, and the age of the spokespeople. Firstly, creating bans on smoking in the university premises may seem as a harsh strategy, especially to students who are highly addicted to smoking. This strategy can be implemented with the help of strict security personnel, who should ensure that any student caught smoking in the university is stopped. However, this is likely to cause student unrest since they may see the strategy as an infringement of their rights (Foleno, 1992). On the other hand, proper consultation and discussion with all the university’s students on the need to ban smoking totally in the institution may help in adhering to the new policy.
The second factor, anti-smoking ads, may also be of significant value to the new policy. Anti-smoking advertising can succeed in the long run only if there is clarity and consistency in the messages. Since most of the university students normally fail to pay attention to boring ads, anti-smoking ads should have captivating themes, which will attract the students to read the messages on the ads (Pechmann & Reibling, 2000). The messages should discuss the adverse negative effects of smoking such as lung cancer, smelly breath, and mouth cancer (Boyle, 2004). In addition, public lectures that focus on both the short and long-term effects of smoking can be incorporated into the policy. Such lectures are likely to enlighten students at the university on the health issues associated with smoking tobacco (Boyle, 2004). For the lectures to be taken seriously by the students, the people chosen to...
... middle of paper ...
...tegy 2004-2009. National Drug Strategy, 2, 85-109.
Pechmann, C., & Reibling, E. T. (2000). Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: Case studies from USA and Canada. Tobacco Control, 9, ii18-ii31.
Puhl, R. (2013). Anti-obesity campaigns do not work. The Times of India. Retrieved from http://www.timesofindia.com/life-style/health-fitness/Anti-obesity-campaigns-do-not -work/articleshow/16397938.cms
Puhl, R., Peterson, J. L., & Luedicke, J. (2013). Fighting obesity or obese persons: Public perceptions of obesity-related health messages. International Journal of Obesity, 37, 774-782.
Rocha, C. M., Gomez-Arias, R. D., & Padron, G. J. (2011). International public health: Between old and new paradigms. Pan American Journal of Public Health, 30(2), 99-100.
Rosen, G. (1993). A history of public health. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
World Health Organization, 3 September 2007. Web. The Web. The Web. 4 Apr 2011.
Obesity is a rising problem in the United States. With obesity rates on the rise something must be done to prevent this massive issue. There are ways to help including educating at young ages, improving nutrition facts at restaurants, and providing more space for citizens to get physically active.
in only a few years time we will notice a drastic decline in the total
The target audience of this advertisement is everyone who smokes. The advertisement aims to explain the health and financial consequences of smoking. There is a wide range of ages of those who smoke and this advertisement aims to deter them from smoking. It also targets those who don’t smoke by making them aware of the effects of smoking as
Metcalf, T., & Metcalf, G. (Eds.). (2008). Perspectives on Diseases and Disorders: Obesity. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Cengage Learning
This year alone cigarettes will kill over 420,000 Americans, and many more will suffer from cancers, and circulatory and respiratory system diseases. These horrible illnesses were known to come from cigarettes for years. Recently the Food and Drug Administration declared nicotine, the main chemical in cigarettes, addictive. This explains why smokers continue to use cigarettes even though smokers are aware of the constantly warned about health dangers in cigarettes. Some researchers have also found out that smoking by pregnant women causes the deaths of over 5,000 babies and 115,000 miscarriages. The only way to get rid of the suffering and loss of life by cigarettes is to ban them. . For years cigarettes have been known to cause cancer, emphysema, and other horrible illnesses. The deaths of over 420,000 of Americans this year will be do to cigarettes. With all the other causes of deaths, alcohol, illegal drugs, AIDS, suicide, transportation accidents, fires, and guns, cigarettes still count for more deaths than those do combined. We can’t stand and watch people die because they smoke cigarettes. Thousands of smokers try to rid themselves of cigarettes but can't because of additive nicotine. Nicotine was recently declared addictive by the Food and Drug Administration, which explains why many smokers continue to smoke despite the health warnings on cigarette smoking. Nicotine makes it almost impossible for cigarette smokers to quit smoking because of its addictive nature, and with the cigarette manufacturers putting just enough nicotine in the so they cant be outlawed. The benefits of outlawing cigarettes greatly outnumber the disadvantages, for example, many scientists believe a link between smoking and a shortened life span exists between the two, a ban on cigarettes could increase life spans. Many studies suggest that billions of dollars now spent on smoking related. Smoking related illnesses could be reduced by outlawing cigarettes, families could save money by not purchasing cigarettes, and accidental fires costing millions of dollars caused by cigarettes would stop. Although a complete ban on cigarettes currently remains almost impossible, several organizations recently helped create a bill that could control cigarettes much in the same way the government now controls drugs. One such organization, the Food and Drug Administration, headed by David Kesslar drafted a major part, which would require manufacturers to disclose the 700 chemical additives in cigarettes, reduce the level of harmful chemicals, require cigarette companies to warn of the addictive nicotine, restrict tobacco advertising and promotion, and control the level of nicotine cigarettes contain.
World Health Organisation (2003) [online] [Accessed 6th December 2013] Available from World Wide Web: < http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html>
Tobacco smoke contains over 7,000 chemicals that are incredibly harmful to our bodies. It is simply unethical to allow one’s employees, patients, customers, clients, etc. to be exposed to secondhand smoke. Smoking not only decreases morale with frequent smoke breaks, it also causes a sharp decline in clientele or patients who prefer a smoke free environment, like pregnant women. As a community, we need to protect those who choose not to expose themselves to the number one preventable causes of death in the United States. Taking on a tobacco-free campus policy and refusing to hire smokers, supports the global cause to end tobacco use.
Orme J, Powell J Taylor P Harrison T Grey M (2003) Public Health for 21st Century Open University Press
Every year, there are over 400,000 smoking-related deaths in the United States. A large percentage of these are due to lung cancer, whose leading cause is smoking. However, not all deaths are smokers themselves. Anyone in the vicinity can fall victim to second hand smoke. These people, through no action of their own, can have their lives threatened.
Memorandum TO: PublicFirst Employee FROM: PublicFirst Human Resources DATE: October 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Company Smoking Policy To all employees of PeopleFirst LLP, The California Indoor Clean Air Act of 1976 declares tobacco smoke as a health hazard to the general public. The law defines smoking as the “act of lighting, smoking or carrying a lighted or smoldering cigar, cigarette or pipe, reclassified e-cigarettes and vapor products of any kind.” California prohibits smoking in all enclosed workplaces, both private and public, including vehicles, parking garages and covered parking lots, and common areas such as lobbies, restrooms, break rooms, stairwells, and elevators.
London, England. The.. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine n.d., Session 5: The role of the state. in global health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England. Ricci J.
Most controversial debate is going on public smoking ban. The reason is simple, smoking ban affects directly all people rapidly and we can see its effects in a short-term period. There have been a lot of arguments brought up both in favour and against a public smoking ban. Some of the arguments in favour are the following. Smoking ban is one of the controversial ways for reducing smoking and recognizing non-smokers’ right to health protection. The health risks of smoking are clear. Passive smoking does carry risks. Many leading medical and scientific organizations recognize second hand smoke as a cause of a range of life-threatening conditions. The health situation could be drastically improved if one of the risk factors - tobacco - was eliminated. People have a right to protect themselves from smoke inhalation. People shouldn’t have to inhale the ill-effects of other people’s smoking. The creation of smoke-free public places also improves air quality.
C. You get stains on clothes and you smell really bad when you have been
“Approximately 20 percent of students begin smoking in college and another 50 percent intensify their smoking behavior” (“Smoking on College & University Campuses”). This shows greatly people are influenced at this time and the dangers of having a college campus where it is acceptable to smoke. If smokers don’t have an easily accessible place to smoke then they will be a lot less likely smoke especially since one of the most common types of smoking in college is social smoking. Social smoking is often thought of as not dangerous since it usually involves the smoker only smoking a few cigarettes in a day then they might not do it for a couple days or even weeks after. The dangers of this is people often aren’t aware of how easily they can become addicted and that they can actually become addicted within seconds of taking just one puff of a cigarette (“Social Smoking”). These smoking bans could turn out to be not just beneficial for students but for teachers as well, actually helping “to nudge more campus workers to snuff out the habit” (Stansbury). Along with the reduction of the pollution of the student’s bodies from smoking it will also help reduce the pollution on college