Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay about the animal in our society
An essay about the animal in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay about the animal in our society
“Much as we might want to understand animals at a level deeper than pop culture, we can only understand them in terms of our own experiences, language and emotions, and interpreted within our social, historical and cultural contexts. The only way we have of understanding animals is to recognize that ‘when we gaze at animals we hold up a mirror to ourselves’ (Corbett, 176). Animal messages are brought to us by the pop culture industry, whose job it is to create, disseminate, and sell meaning. In most cases, they aren’t selling you a moose, but what a moose means to you for example – the characteristics and qualities that you and most people associate with the species. Based on common meanings presented to us from an early age, animals are the perfect shorthand communication symbol. We use animals as devices, metaphors and symbols for a great deal of our expressions and ideas” (Corbett, 179).
For years, animals have been at the center of our world; “the lives of animals and humans have been inextricably intertwined” (Corbett, 178). Thus, based on the close relationship between animals and humans throughout history, in my opinion animals have been used in all cultures to reflect the nature of humanity, symbolizing societal and individual characteristics. The traits of animals are very simple to observe and recognize, whereas human behavior is more intricate and difficult to describe. Animals are familiar creatures to us, which mutely encourage projection of people’s emotions and attitudes onto them. Animals can be used and as we have learned most recently, they are used to convey deep dimensions of human feelings and ideas. When I think of animals, their representation and their symbolism in our society, I immediately think of ani...
... middle of paper ...
...in this piece, would be to dive into researching the answer to this: the fact that there I think there is something very clever to be said about a corporation that uses an animal to talk to its prospects, but are we really sure what that is? Are we sure what to say about a society that listens, and responds to spokescreatures? Perhaps we find them more credible than spokespersons. Do we?
Works Cited
Corbett, Julia B. Communicating Nature: How We Create and Understand Environmental Messages. Washington, DC: Island, 2006. Print.
2. "Seven Top Animal Symbols Used By Company Name Generators." EzineArticles Submission - Submit Your Best Quality Original Articles For Massive Exposure, Ezine Publishers Get 25 Free Article Reprints. Web. 05 Dec. 2010. .
In the article “A change of heart about animals” author Jeremy Rifkin uses rhetorical appeals such as ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade humanity in a desperate attempt to at the very least have empathy for “our fellow creatures” on account of the numerous research done in pursuit of animal rights. Rifkin explains here that animals are more like us than we imagined, that we are not the only creatures that experience complex emotions, and that we are not the only ones who deserve empathy.
Michelle Carr uses a rhetorical mode for the purpose of persuasion in her article, “The Reality of Zoos.” She effectively presents her points by using the persuasive methods of pathos and logos. Carr establishes an emotional connection with the reader by recalling an occasion she noticed how miserable zoo animals were during a childhood memory. Carr also uses logic and reasoning; she appeals to the reader by using facts and figures about the suffering zoo animals experience, like the animals developing “zoochosis” and risking their lives in an attempt to flee captivity. By establishing an emotional connection with the reader and using logic and reasoning, Carr may have persuaded the reader. Nevertheless, the author fails to appeal to the ethical
Linzey, Andrew. Introduction. Animals on the Agenda. Ed. A. Linzey et al. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1998.
Logos utilizes rationale to convince the audience of the advertiser’s argument. The text across the ad implements logos by stating, “If you wouldn’t wear your dog, please don’t wear any fur” (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). The statement compels the audience to contemplate how it is justified to place a higher value in dogs or household pets than non domesticated animals. It causes the viewer to consider why the inhumane treatment of sheep, cows, foxes, rabbits, and other animals to produce clothing is deemed acceptable. But in contrast, if dogs or any other domesticated animal were used for the same purpose, people would be outraged. The use of logos in the ad indicates how all animals should be valued the same and no animal, whether dog or cow, should be slaughtered to manufacture apparel. PETA effectively incorporates logos in the ad to alter how society views the process of animals being tortured and killed for the production of clothing. The organization seeks to change how people identify with the unethical treatment of animals by using logic to correlate the value of household pets to the value of the animals killed by the clothing industry. As PETA uses logos to convince the viewers of their argument, they also incorporate ethos to ensure
The pictures of the animals themselves represent both Pathos and Ethos persuasion. Appealing to nearly every emotion we as humans can possible have, World Wildlife Fund demands our attention while at the same time asking for help.
Animal imagery is used in a straightforward and basic way in order to call specific people and their
Throughout history, it has always been said dogs are “man’s best friend”, but what would happen if we started to hunt man’s best friend? The following two texts revolve around the controversy of hunting animals as a sport, and present themselves as two opposing sides of the human spectrum. The African Safari advertisement is persuading “clients” to come to Africa and to experience a unique safari, which revolves around the opportunity to hunt many magnificent trophy animals in the vast beauty of the country. On the other hand, the League against Animal Cruelty advertisement is informing the general public of the dangers and effects that animal cruelty can have on a society, and asks for support in their endeavor to end the sport of hunting. Though the two texts may have different purposes, in the following commentary each text’s significance of context, audience, and use of stylistic features will be analyzed and compared to one another.
Jimmy Carter uses many methods of persuading the audience, he supports his own idea by sharing a story that related to the subject. He shares a story about a trip that took with his wife to the Arctic Refuge to show that he understand the issue. He pulls on the readers emotions by telling them on how “unforgettable” and “humbling” it was to see the newborn caribou calves being born. Cater using this experience to help motivate the reader to see and also appreciate the beauty that this area has and to show why it is so important to preserve it.
The embodiment of humans’ flaws through the medium of anthropomorphic animals has for centuries demonstrated to be a preferred literary method by which to educate children and adults. Following the steps of Aristotle, The Complete Fables of Jean de La Fontaine juxtaposes the hierarchy in the animal world to the establishment of a human social hierarchy. Meanwhile, Mary Wollstonecraft’s Original Stories from Real Life relies heavily on dialogue and observation to present Wollstonecraft’s argument to practice benevolence towards helpless animals. Both La Fontaine and Wollstonecraft understood the extent to which the unjustified classification of inferior species exacerbates animosity, impedes rational thinking and behavior, and ultimately deteriorates
Pattnaik, J. (2004). On behalf of their animal friends: involving children in animal advocacy: since time immemorial, animals have been serving human society in at least three broad roles: as teachers, as healers, and as companions and friends. Retrieved Jan. 23, 2014, from General Onefile : http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA126651950&v=2.1&u=kis11073&it=r&p=GPS&sw=w&asid=b5705d17631f93b4153aef26e897df9
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals' (PETA) campaign “I'd Rather Go Naked than Wear Fur,” in order to argue that, rather than changing people's thoughts and behavior for the benefit of animals, the campaign succeeds merely in demeaning and hyper-sexualizing women. While PETA has often been successful in generating visual rhetoric that appeals to both the public’s logical reasoning and emotional sentiment, the visual rhetoric in this campaign is unable to generate the same effect. An analysis of the implementation of the three rhetoric appeals - pathos, logos and ethos - show that the organization’s inability to catalyze behavioural change in their target audience can be largely attributed to conflicts
Since we have different perspectives based off our experiences, morals and values we tend to not be as open-minded. When we read an article, or see an advertisement displayed somewhere we tend to jump to our own conclusions being guided by the modes of persuasion. For instance, when I first came across the pair of scissors I myself had my own opinions about the object. However, I put that aside and thought about what message the audience would normally get from this and, what other point of views I could address this from to approach this visual argument in a different way. Without the pair of scissors and the legacy that it has left behind on this campus none of us would’ve joined this Jaguar family and made some of our greatest memories in this campus. Texas A&M San Antonio will continue to expand and take all of its future students through this journey once
Corbett, Julia B. Communicating Nature: How We Create and Understand Environmental Messages. Washington, DC: Island, 2006. Print.
I believe animals play an immense role in the health and happiness of the humans around them. Both my experiences and scientific evidence prove truth behind my belief. Ian Cook, MD, a psychiatrist and director of Depression Research and Clinic Program at UCLA, states “Pets offer an unconditional love that can be very helpful to people with depression.”
Animals can be perceived in many different ways. While some humans consider animals to be mindless machines programmed with instinct, others view them as spiritual creatures capable of coherent thought and emotions. I feel that animals are somewhere in the middle. Although they rely heavily on instinct, the ability to feel emotions shows that their mental capacity is not far from that of a human.