The pictures of the animals themselves represent both Pathos and Ethos persuasion. Appealing to nearly every emotion we as humans can possible have, World Wildlife Fund demands our attention while at the same time asking for help. The photos work on our Pathos reactions presenting a sight we never thought possible, causing us to react with sympathy as we process the unthinkable. Our hearts ache for the cute, lovable animals as they resemble the homeless, we city dwellers so often see, but often refuse to acknowledge. Because the animals are obviously out of place and downtrodden we instantly respond with our Ethos reactions. Making us stop and take a second look at what we know is not right. Creating an alarming feeling of disbelief inside
Having such an image before our eyes, often we fail to recognize the message it is trying to display from a certain point of view. Through Clark’s statement, it is evident that a photograph holds a graphic message, which mirrors the representation of our way of thinking with the world sights, which therefore engages other
711 million people a year sponsor the act of kidnapping, torture, and starvation around the world. If you’ve ever been to a zoo, aquarium or a Seaworld park, you’re one of those 711 million people. Lately, controversy has struck the world over the treatment of animals in those types of facilities. There are many good rehabilitation centers in zoos worldwide that help injured, endangered or ill animals, which is why a lot of people do support them. However, there is a darker side to these parks and facilities. These animals cruel pasts and hidden lives will never be heard unless we help. Help them escape their tortured lives, and see their families they were ripped from when they were only babies. Be the voice of the voiceless and shut down
In the article “A change of heart about animals” author Jeremy Rifkin uses rhetorical appeals such as ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade humanity in a desperate attempt to at the very least have empathy for “our fellow creatures” on account of the numerous research done in pursuit of animal rights. Rifkin explains here that animals are more like us than we imagined, that we are not the only creatures that experience complex emotions, and that we are not the only ones who deserve empathy.
In a society dominated by visual activity, it is not uncommon to be faced with images meant to render a specific reaction. It is the intention of industries to provoke a reaction whether it is mental, emotional, or physical and specifically through the use of ethos, pathos, and logos. Both images displayed, the first by the PETA organization or People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and the other by UNESCO or the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization share similar tactics in which they influence their audience’s reaction. As an American animal rights organization that campaigns for the “ethical treatment of animals”, PETA’s most dominant mode of persuasion is especially exemplified by the use of pathos. In an attempt to induce sympathy from the audience, specifically from animal rights advocates, PETA uses the representation of a woman with the pattern of a tiger’s stripes.
The introduction page of the website touches base with rhetorical appeal of pathos with unpleasant features meant to effect the reader's emotions. For instance, the introduction page has pictures of some criminals who kill many dolphins, and the sea turned red because there is blood-stained water everywhere with the caption, ''Stop slaughter''. This is a good way to make the reader feel melancholic for what happens in real life. Then they will convince the readers to donate to them to encourage stopping killing animals. When the reader sees these kinds of pictures, they are going to be motivated to support the Sea Shepherds. In this way, the Sea Shepherds appeal to the readers' emotions to help them stop the extinction of sea animals.
Photography allows us to maintain memories and relish them whenever we desire. Although some advocates might argue that people are no longer enjoying experiences instead taking more pictures, in the essay, “Why We Take Pictures”, by Susan Sontag, she conflates that photography can be used as a defense against anxiety and a tool of empowerment. I agree with Sontag on the significance of photographs and how it allows us to store a part of our extended relatives so we are able to hold on the memories of family. Therefore, we must appreciate how photography allows us to manage anxiety, express feelings and remember our loved ones.
Mentioning his own organization offers the audience the verification that the author knows what he is talking about, and the set standards of the programs verification process has a third party, and that is what can establish the ethos of the American Humane Association’s Humane Conservation program. Pathos and Logical Appeal This argument appeals logically to an audience that is concerned about the safety and care of animals in zoos, while establishing pathos effectively to tug at the feelings of the audience in order to strengthen his argument. Since the recent event with a gorilla at the Cincinnati Zoo, people have questioned ethics. The author wrote this argument to explain why the safety of animals, as well as their survival in the future, depends on these enclosures.
“PETA Calls On Everyone With A Heart To Help End Animal-Overpopulation Crisis.”PR Newswire 3 Feb. 2014. Student Resources in Context. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
The fabricators of the ASPCA commercial are extremely manipulative in order to receive a donation. They use captions that are doleful and afflicting. “Every single hour in BC, an animal is violently abused” (Sarah McLachlan Animal Cruelty Video) is one example of a caption. This caption uses pathos perfectly in the way that makes the viewers donate to decrease the chance of another animal being abused. Another example is: “For hundreds of others, help came too late” (Sarah McLachlan Animal Cruelty Video). Simply implying “help came too late” grants viewers to feel bad for the animals that have passed, therefore allowing the observer to donate so another animal doesn’t have to die. Also, the awful images of the battered animals allow spectators
She allows the reader to identify with her by pointing out that she “went to the zoo all the time with [her] family” and that she “loved pandas” (Carr); the reader identifies with her, as the reader is likely to have visited the zoo as a child or likely to have a love for animals. Initially, she was very excited about seeing the animals so closely, but then she realized, even at that age, the “animals were miserable” (Carr). By telling the reader about her memory, Carr persuades the reader into believing that zoos are depressing and that animals do not belong in unnatural environments. Carr also mentions that she no longer goes to the zoo and urges her family and friends to do the same. The author then adds that she has a love for animals and wishes for the zoo animals to be set free. Again, by involving loved ones and reinforcing her love for animals, Carr appeals to the emotions of the reader. The reader is then likely to identify with the author, urge his or her family members and friends to not go to the zoo, and wish to see animals free from captivity. Therefore, Carr persuades the reader into believing that zoos are wicked by using the persuasive method of pathos. Along with Carr appealing to the reader’s emotions, she appeals to the reader’s
Attenborough’s and Irwin’s purpose is to educate the audience and to inspire compassion for the animal kingdom. Attenborough achieves this by using factual information
Media possesses the unique potential to manipulate society’s view of events and products in today’s culture. Images, color, font, background and other alluring advertising techniques are all employed to entice consumers. Different sources of media aspire to shape the identity of the consumer regarding the concepts they are advertising. Seeking to influence society’s identity and perception of the treatment of animals, in their advertisement “How Can You Speak Up for Animals,” People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) demonstrates the argument that consumers should not purchase clothing that is produced through the killing of innocent animals by successfully appealing to the audience’s emotions, utilizing logic to validate their claim,
Interpretations of Photography Different people interpret photographs in many different ways. The way the photo is interpreted by a person can depend on what kind of job they have, how old they are, and how or where they grew up. Photos can also have an emotional effect on a person and bring back memories. How do you interpret the photograph on page one? Does it bring back any memories?
As far as the semiotic hypothesis in the convention, the photo serves not just as a record that focuses to or corresponds with an outer protest, yet additionally as a symbol that looks to some extent like 'the scene itself, the exacting reality.' To a vast degree, the watcher's feeling of stun and good shock gets from the capacity of the photo in that capacity a picture of reality, affirming the veracity of the repulsions saw and inferring the earnestness of activity expected to cure the
Other people believe that animals belong to the wild. Animals are not on Earth to simply entertain. They have an important role in