Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stronger laws against animal cruelty
Positive and negative impacts of animal abuse
Animal abuse and effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
How would you like it if your skin were used to create an article of clothing? Or if you were tested on in a lab experiment just to be killed off afterwards? That’s a challenge that a majority of animals have to face every day. It seems as if cruel deaths are the fate of most animals nowadays. Richard Connell’s short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” revolves around Sanger Rainsford, a hunter who later discovers the wrong in killing animals. “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell could be used to oppose animal cruelty. Animal cruelty is a major world issue that needs to come to an end. Every day an animal loses its life due to cruel deeds performed by wicked people. Approximately one billion animals are being murdered annually for selfish purposes. There are various forms of animal cruelty, but the most common form of animal cruelty tends to be apparel use. Many brands use genetically-modified animals to …show more content…
In the opening of the story, Connell depicts the protagonist of the story, Sanger Rainsford, as a cold-blooded hunter who has no regard for animal life. Connell clearly states Rainsford’s disgust for animals: “’Who cares how a jaguar feels?’” Rainsford’s ‘killer’ demeanor remains until he reaches conflict with the adversary of the story, General Zaroff. Connell states Rainsford’s change of heart: “The baying of the hounds drew nearer…Rainsford knew now how an animal at bay feels.” Now getting the short end of the stick, Rainsford is finally able to empathize with animals that suffer unjustifiable deaths. Rainsford can now share the same point-of-view of hunted animals. Only after being hunted by General Zaroff is Rainsford aware of the wrong of killing animals. Rainsford’s newfound knowledge about animal cruelty is addressed to the readers as well. Connell’s intent is to relay a subliminal message to readers that animal cruelty of any sort is
Rainsford is known for his extravagant hunting skills, even General Zaroff speaks of Rainsford as is if he has inspired him to become a hunter. Rainsford talks about hunting with passion, while he is speaking to Whitney he tells her it’s “the best sport in the world” (19). Rainsford has no guilt when he kills animals, he even tells Whitney that it’s nonsense when she mention the jaguars have feeling. But Rainsford shows immediate disgust when Zaroff brings up his hunting of humans, “hunting, great heavens, what you speak of is murder” (26). This only the first of many times that he reacts with great displeasure.
In “The Most Dangerous Game” the author creates two strikingly similar characters that blur the line of ethics. Rainsford, the protagonist, meets his adversary and leader of an exotic tribe, Zaroff, after falling off of a yacht and swimming to the nearest island. The short story then explores the events that transpires between the strangers – focusing on Zaroff's bloodthirsty hunt against Rainsford. Yet even with the two men on opposite sides of a loaded gun, they both share many common interests and views pertaining to their similar backgrounds, hunting methods, and desired end result.
At first, Rainsford related to and was even impressed by Zaroffthe general for his experience in hunting. HoweverTherefore, when Zaroff explained hishe was told of the General’s new choice in prey, Rainsford was so shocked andthat he was unable to think. However, he still instinctively felt that hunting humans was absurd. When talking to the general about hunting humans, the appalled Rainsford admits that he disagrees with this form of “Hunting? General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder”, but the general refused “to believe that so modern and civilized a young man as you seem to be harbors romantic ideas about the value of human life”(101). Rainsford’s conversation with the General clearly resembles the previous conversation he had with Whitney, where General Zaroff values human life as little as Rainsford valued the jaguar’s life. This is a parallel conversation in which he unknowingly switches sides, disagreeing with his previous argument made in the first conversation. General Zaroff tries to persuade Rainsford to accompany him on a hunting day, but Rainsford continues to refuse claiming that the war “Did not make me condone cold-blooded murder,”(101). In his first conversation with Whitney, Rainsford doesn’t seem to put any thought or regret into hunting animals as prey because he
Connell's use of foreshadowing creates an atmosphere of mystery and a hesitant feeling of not knowing what events will occur. For instance, Zaroff "has ceased [hunting]'; because all the animals "had become too easy'; to chase; but one animal has a certain characteristic of being "able to reason'; which rekindles his passion for the thrill of the hunt (68). The vague statement at which Zaroff makes at Rainsford obviously hints toward humans as being the animal of reason because referring to the statement Rainsford makes in the early stages of the story, he asserts that animals do not feel or think. Now that Rainsford conceives the idea that Zaroff hunts humans, it provides Rainsford with a frustrating mental reaction of fear and anger because Zaroff openly declares that he poaches humans for amusement and yet Rainsford feels the anxiety of dying in his sick game. Equally important, while Zaroff hunts strategically, "[his] brain against [Rainsford]'; (71), "it sent a shudder of cold horror'; in the flowing veins of Rainsford because of the fear that he will "lose [his] nerve'; (73). Immediately, when Rainsford enters the repulsive jungle, he knows that the strategy for staying alive becomes not only physically, but by remaining mentally strong and not losing his nerves. For this reason, by staying on objective and visualizing his goal of achieving victory over Zaroff; Rainsford will not have to worry about weakness from hunger because he will be full of hope and optimism for the rest of his life. Connell utilizes foreshadowing in a way that other authors do not compare because when he uses an event that contains foreshadowing, he does not state it candidly but blends foreshadowing into story like the ...
The characters in this story, while interesting, are certainly not realistic. Yet, the author creates a likeable character in Sanger Rainsford and a despicable one in General Zaroff. Rainsford is the protagonist of this story. He is portrayed as a round character as he displays multiple traits. Interestingly, one of the ways he shows multiple traits is in his attitude toward whatever he is hunting. In the beginning of the story, Rainsford explains to a sailor, "Who cares how a jaguar feels?" (Connell) At this point he has no sympathy for the animal. It is simply an object to be hunted. However, that attitude changes when he, himself, becomes General Zaroff's prey. Once that happens, Rainsford all of a sudden cannot believe Zaroff's attitude toward what is being hunted, in this case, a man. Rainsford exclaims, "H...
Every year over 100 million animals die in the US; the cause for these deaths, animal testing. This injustice to animals involves testing products such as medical drugs or makeup, on poor imprisoned animals that don’t have the ability to stand for their own rights as most of us do. Animals used for testing are given products that may result in burning, poisoning, or death. These animals are forced to live in confined spaces where they wait until the next horrible experiment. They are, tortured beyond imagination as they are sometimes even cut open while they are alive (know as vivisection), either with expired analgesics or even without them.
“I wanted the ideal animal to hunt," explained the general. In The Most Dangerous Game the antagonist, Zaroff, decides to hunt a new animal, since he is bored of his typical hunting. This was due to him believing that he is far too good to continue hunting these animals since they had no reason. So, he decides to hunt one with reason, humans. With having him hunt humans instead of “actual animals” this causes a great conflict between him and the Protagonist, Rainsford. Rainsford believes in having equal power for all and that killing people is one of the most inhumane acts on can condone. These characteristics that each character has, has a much deep meaning behind them. With Rainsford characteristics symbolizes democracy. But on the other
Every year, over 100 million animals are killed for experimentation, biology lessons, medical/military training, and cosmetic, drug, and chemical testing. Animals are tortured all over the world and still lack lawful protection.
Would you ever kick a harmless cat as hard as you can? Could you ever hurt a harmless animal, especially if it was just asking for your attention? Gary L. Francione, in his opinion article Stop scapegoating the cat-kicker, seems to think that the case of Andre Robinson kicking a stray cat 15 feet into the air should not be prosecuted or punished. He goes even further and compares Andre Robinson to every single person who eats meat, fish, dairy or eggs. From Francione’s point of view, all meat-eaters are the same as Andre Robinson who kicked a cat. According to him, all the non-vegans who stand up against animal abuse and cruelty are hypocrites. I believe going into such extremes and comparing those two things is absolutely absurd. I work in an animal hospital and personally would never hurt an animal unless it was a life threatening situation.
The ugly truth is that animals are dying at the hands of their owners everyday, some in very violent ways that can be avoidable given the right solution. Slaughterhouses, puppy mills, dog fighting, and so on, are just a few examples of how animals are being treated badly by people. Animal cruelty is a form of violence which, un...
Simple household items such as lotions, shampoos and cosmetics aren’t very expensive and are within reach for the public, yet the public is not knowledgeable of the fact that the products that they use everyday are put through a series of tests which involve the use of harmless animals. Several large commercial companies do not make products for animals; they decide that using these harmless creatures for the testing of their products, could be cause to be harmful to animals still go forward with these types of procedures on an everyday basis. Although these animals are unable to defend themselves or signs of any form of consent for the near death procedures, these companies find this as a cheap solution for testing their products before placing them on the market. There are many other alternatives to testing animals such as embryonic stem cell research. Animal experimentation is wrong and it can be avoided but companies which are greedy for money chose not to.
Imagine being beaten to near death and being painfully skinned alive. This scenario seems as if it would only happen in a horror film, but in reality it occurs on a daily basis. Looking at a fur coat through a store window or in a glossy magazine one may not realize that animals were beaten, electrocuted, crammed in filthy wire cages, or even hanged just to produce a simple fur coat. Every year millions of animals are treated wrongly and even killed for the fur on their backs. Society may think twice about wearing the corpse of an animal when one knows what really happens in the name of fashion. An immeasurable amount of suffering went into every fur trimmed jacket, leather belt, or wool sweater hanging in ones closet. To eradicate the unnecessary suffering of animals for fashion, wearing fur must be made illegal.
Through many years, companies have tested animals to help prove that their products are safe for humans. This has become a very inhumane practice in which many animals are subjected to intolerable cruelty. Animals are treated cruelty because they are kept in cages with unhealthy conditions. Important aspects must be considered in the inhumane treatment of animals in research facilities. These aspects are focused in th...
Animal Cruelty has many forms, many reasons and most importantly many victims. It is a growing problem in today’s society. Many people may wonder why people abuse animals. The thought is simple, however the answer is a little more complex, there are three main types of animal cruelty. The three reasons are as follows: unintentional, intentional, and cruel intentions. I will discuss each one in more detail.
The meaning of cruelty is perpetrating brutality, ruthlessness and agony. Millions of animals are killed every year for clothing. These can range from foxes, rabbits, snakes, sheep’s and even chinchillas. Such animals are being mistreated and neglected. The research findings of how many animals are being killed is immense and appalling. Around 75 million animals are killed and the world’s largest supplier of animal skins is China.1 Within the past few years, 95% of seals in Canada have been viciously slaughtered and skinned alive, most being